![]() |
Software for Davis Vantage Pro?
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:53:44 -0000, "Peter Crosland"
wrote: I have the Davis software and WeatherDisplay. Whilst the first works perfectly it does not provide all the facilities I want. On the other hand WD has a fantastic range of facilities but is by definition so complex that is hard to set up. WD also has some bugs that have not been cured. Has anybody got any other suggestions as to what to try? Well, since no-one seems to have commented (publicly at least): Perhaps the key point is to hear in which particular respects you're unhappy with Weatherlink. It is undoubtedly more limited in not having the same breadth of features as one or two other programs like Weather Display, but to be able to suggest the best alternative it would be helpful to know which bits of WL you're least happy with. More generally, it's a very uncommon and clever software developer who includes a large number of features and at the same time manages to make their program relatively easy to use. Typically, having lots of features tends to translate to a complex user interface. With the best design it doesn't have to, but given that the appeal of WL-related programs for a lot of potential users, especially in the US, seems to revolve around maximising the feature count, it's this count per se that seems to get the design priority rather than ease-of-use, cosmetic appeal, scientific accuracy etc of the user interface. All of which isn't to say that ther aren't some impressive alternative packages out there, but I'm not sure you're going to be happy with them if absolute ease-of-use is your main criterion. John Dann www.weatherstations.co.uk |
Software for Davis Vantage Pro?
Well, since no-one seems to have commented (publicly at least): Perhaps the key point is to hear in which particular respects you're unhappy with Weatherlink. It is undoubtedly more limited in not having the same breadth of features as one or two other programs like Weather Display, but to be able to suggest the best alternative it would be helpful to know which bits of WL you're least happy with. More generally, it's a very uncommon and clever software developer who includes a large number of features and at the same time manages to make their program relatively easy to use. Typically, having lots of features tends to translate to a complex user interface. With the best design it doesn't have to, but given that the appeal of WL-related programs for a lot of potential users, especially in the US, seems to revolve around maximising the feature count, it's this count per se that seems to get the design priority rather than ease-of-use, cosmetic appeal, scientific accuracy etc of the user interface. Thanks for your reply John. I have made some progress with WD that I really would like to retain since I have paid for it. My real problem seems to be that I don't have any knowledge of HTML or FTP and I simply can't spend large amounts of time learning them. When It does not work I simply don't know where to start looking for the error. The ISP tools I was using have all sorts of traps for the unwary and I fell into all of them! Having designed a very basic page using the easy tools I eventually found that sites created using these were not accessible via FTP. Guess I shall just have to persevere. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk