Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Will" wrote in message ... OK I put my hands up and say I WAS WRONG to emphasise the severe weather so much. Would I do it again given the same evidence - probably. No apology necessary Will - *you* don't cost £450m a year to run ![]() -- Chris www.ivy-house.net |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good on you Will, at least we all still have our fences and roof tiles
in tact :-) We now move onto the next show, whatever that may be :-) Keith (Southend) ******************************** 'Weather Home & Abroad' http://www.southendweather.net ******************************** COL Station for Southend-on-Sea http://www.wunderground.com/weathers...p?ID=IESSEXSO1 ******************************** Reply to: kreh'at'southendweather'dot'net All mail scanned for virus's using Norton 2003 |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Succorso" wrote in message
... No apology necessary Will - *you* don't cost £450m a year to run ![]() -- Chris www.ivy-house.net £450m a year to run ? Who is that then ? Cheers Ian |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You know my wife :-)
Keith (Southend) ******************************** 'Weather Home & Abroad' http://www.southendweather.net ******************************** COL Station for Southend-on-Sea http://www.wunderground.com/weathers...p?ID=IESSEXSO1 ******************************** Reply to: kreh'at'southendweather'dot'net All mail scanned for virus's using Norton 2003 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:29:31 -0000, "Ian Watkins" wrote: "Succorso" wrote in message ... No apology necessary Will - *you* don't cost £450m a year to run ![]() -- Chris www.ivy-house.net £450m a year to run ? Who is that then ? Cheers Ian |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Will wrote:
OK I put my hands up and say I WAS WRONG to emphasise the severe weather so much. Would I do it again given the same evidence - probably. Will, As others have said, there is no need to apologise. It is incidents like this that make the weather exciting. If predictions were simple and able to be guaranteed, I suspect that a lot of folks would stop taking such an interest in the weather. Forget yesterday and move on. As I type this, the wind is picking up with a maximum gust of 33.8 mph. The barometer is dropping at about 3mb per hour and now reads 987mb. The temperature is also rising and is now at 8.9C. (guess who now has a weather station g) -- Howard Neil |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I WAS WRONG to emphasise the severe weather so much. I haven't time to read all the responses but I imagine they all say pretty much the same. Yes the forecast was wrong, but it was a good forecast given what you knew and your skill to interpret it. We were all happy to accept it then. Nevertheless to admit it was wrong helps us understand how difficult it can be at times and we wish sometimes others would use the W word rather than pretend it didn't happen. Thanks, keep up the good work, Dave |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Will" wrote in message ... ================================================== ================== This posting expresses the personal view and opinions of the author. Something which everyone on this planet should be able to do. ================================================== ================== OK I put my hands up and say I WAS WRONG to emphasise the severe weather so much. Would I do it again given the same evidence - probably. The evidence was there, it tracked further south, the jet wasn't quite as strong as expected, further details not in evidence, eg. lack of clear water vapour dry slot yesterday evening prob implying later deepening. GFS did well, but hindsight is a wonderful thing. I made a mistake and I'll make many more no doubt, but I'll still get more right than wrong ! Humbling cheers, Will. -- " A cup is most useful when empty " -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- A COL BH site in East Dartmoor at Haytor, Devon 310m asl (1017 feet). mailto: www: http://www.lyneside.demon.co.uk DISCLAIMER - All views and opinions expressed by myself are personal and do not necessarily represent those of my employer. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Sadly we live in a blame culture. AND IT'S ALL WILL'S FAULT! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Weather Apology on Jazz FM | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The Met Office - an apology | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
TWO makes an apology for November forecast | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
TWO makes an apology for November forecast | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Apology if Mad Bill Pal m er has been annoying members of uk.sci.weather? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |