Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releas...-bse081204.php
British scientists viewed controversies as events, caused by pre-existing dissenters within the community. The Swedish scientists tended to think of controversies as a process, and of fully-fledged 'mavericks' as the dangerous result of a gradual positioning of disenchanted scientists who ended up attacking a community to which they no longer belonged. British scientists felt it was crucial to avoid giving scientific legitimacy to scientists that they described as 'mavericks' and that their distancing from the scientific community was therefore necessary. Swedish scientists thought that ousting of dissenting scientists only served to exacerbate problems. With the exception of university research, mechanisms for control of outgoing material tended to be more elaborate and more strictly followed in Britain, than in Sweden. British scientists also felt that a breach of procedures would have graver consequences, than did their Swedish peers. British scientists viewed surveying of outgoing material and communication of research as safety mechanisms in place for their own protection, whereas Swedish interviewees to perceive such procedures as a sign of increasing bureaucracy. British scientists felt a greater need for claims to be 'watertight', imagining a potentially hostile response. ************************************************** ********************** It's a lot worse in the USA if the following link is anything to go by: http://www.xasa.com/grupos/en/sci/ar...eo.earthquakes -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is
proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance That principle is contempt prior to investigation." -HerbertSpencer -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 16:37:14 +0000 (UTC), in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Michael
Mcneil" wrote: "There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance That principle is contempt prior to investigation." -HerbertSpencer Which has nothing what-so-ever with you, bible-boi. -- Ak'toh'di |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Officer" wrote in message
Which has nothing what-so-ever with you, bible-boi. Quite so. I rather believe he was deriding the scholars of his day about their capacity to deal with the theory of evolution. The answer of course in the absence of scientific control is to suck it and see. My methods work despite not having an explanation. Whilst evolution is palpably lacking in day to day evidence what with the unsurvival of not just species but genus these days; and the international placement of its practioners in gaols. (Of course not believing in evolution I don't see thieves and murderers as heros of a modern myth.) -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 10:53:38 +0000 (UTC), in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Michael
Mcneil" wrote: "Bob Officer" wrote in message Which has nothing what-so-ever with you, bible-boi. Quite so. I rather believe he was deriding the scholars of his day about their capacity to deal with the theory of evolution. The answer of course in the absence of scientific control is to suck it and see. My methods work despite not having an explanation. Not that you have shown to anyone. Your methods at balderdash... Utter nonsense. -- Ak'toh'di |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob Officer" wrote in message
Not that you have shown to anyone. Your methods at balderdash... Utter nonsense. You mean there were no fireworks in July and the rainfall world wide in August was not unusual? OO OOk OOKAY. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Mcneil" wrote in message news:e18ad59fa43d9f925e39bf43e5fb49b1.45219@mygate .mailgate.org... "Bob Officer" wrote in message Not that you have shown to anyone. Your methods at balderdash... Utter nonsense. You mean there were no fireworks in July and the rainfall world wide in August was not unusual? Apart from the 4th July Fireworks? Not really And the worldwide rainfall wasn't outside of the normal parameters. HTH |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Please McNeil, do not be concerned about the most unjust criticisms
levelled at you. You have a very acute mind, and your understanding of the direct relation between weather and all other Earth phenomena's is quite correct ! .. and quite in line indeed with a True Geology approach, indeed ! .... in a article of the past _ which I cannot retrieve _ someone was even pointing out to specific type of clouds anticipating E-Quakes ! With best regards -- Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud Australia Mining Pioneer Discoverer & Legal Owner of Telfer; Kintyre & Nifty Mines The Great Sandy Desert.of Australia Discoverer of the South Atlantic Submarine Gold Placers ( 40 Millions Tons estimate ) FOUNDER OF THE TRUE GEOLOGY ~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~ "Wally Anglesea" a écrit dans le message de ... "Michael Mcneil" wrote in message news:e18ad59fa43d9f925e39bf43e5fb49b1.45219@mygate .mailgate.org... "Bob Officer" wrote in message Not that you have shown to anyone. Your methods at balderdash... Utter nonsense. You mean there were no fireworks in July and the rainfall world wide in August was not unusual? Apart from the 4th July Fireworks? Not really And the worldwide rainfall wasn't outside of the normal parameters. HTH |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud" wrote in message
One has to judge the people who can stick their heads up their backsides by the size of their heads not the scope of their ignorance. Imagine living in the Antipodes and being ignorant of the hurricanes and "pestillences" that struck there twice in one year, THIS year, depite holding some sort of an interest in geophysics.... ... in a article of the past _ which I cannot retrieve _ someone was even pointing out to specific type of clouds anticipating E-Quakes ! I think that set of threads will have been munged by a virus that hit the major web servers around mid May last year. Try "Lantern" clouds. Not that I followed it that closely. Anyone here see this week's Terry Jones series about Medieval sciences? Interesting stuff, I missed the first part -for the second time running. -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Mcneil" wrote in message news:04f376d01444e069ce21207bfc08acdf.45219@mygate .mailgate.org... "Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud" wrote in message One has to judge the people who can stick their heads up their backsides by the size of their heads not the scope of their ignorance. Imagine living in the Antipodes and being ignorant of the hurricanes and "pestillences" that struck there twice in one year, THIS year, depite holding some sort of an interest in geophysics.... My goodness!! We had 2 Hurricanes that struck us in a year.. Impossible. Australia doesn't get Hurricanes. However, it's quite common to get several cyclones in a season. As for pestilences? Again, locust "plagues" are common. Pleae learn some geography before you post again. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Next 10 days potentially looking pretty awful with and looking cooland wet on the 24th. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
outside sensor help | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
outside sensor help | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
outside sensor help | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
How to end ridiculous weather outside broadcasts! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |