On Monday, 7 March 2016 08:48:33 UTC, Richard Dixon wrote:
In terms of the people from this thread, I still hear from Joe Hunt, Martin Rowley and Waghorn.

Richard

Nice to know thanks.

***

From the CRU pdf:

We have records back many centuries in some regions -millennia for Italy and
Japan because of the existence of written records -but in many regions such as

(where it is according to the article, most important)
the North Pacific and large parts of the tropics, direct evidence is limited.

Fortunately, the material in the veils eventually falls to Earth and an
excellent record is preserved on the ice caps of Greenland and Antarctica.

(All else being equal, that means the effects of the declinations of Jupiter and Saturn not being a factor in the eruption of volcanoes or in the overall temperatures of the planet. And we know that they are not because?)

We may not know where the eruption occurred but the frequency can be compared over several millennia. (Provided as I said: Dah dah, dah dah, dah dah dumb.)

***

Ah wait a minute...
I posted a method for location of likely eruptions forecast by these very people. How dare they ignore me?
Cheeky *******s!

On Wednesday, 6 October 2004 11:48:22 UTC+1, Joe wrote:
phil wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:44:56 +0200, "Gianna Stefani"
wrote:



All I can see on that link is multi-coloured munge .... tried with Firefox
and IE


That's because it's currently dark .......... give it a few hours and
try later when the sun comes up.



But could you see the volcano in the dark if she erupted ?

Joe

Modern satellites have IR sensors fitted. It's so the chaps at NIC can help the George Clooneys at the CIA observe which arch criminals get off which Soviet Union trains before the nuclear bombs planted to hide the hijack go off.
It can incidentally if they move the satellites on time be used to monitor eruptions. But who's going to pay for that; Margaret Thatcher and the CRU?

On Monday, 7 March 2016 13:26:09 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2016 08:48:33 UTC, Richard Dixon wrote:
In terms of the people from this thread, I still hear from Joe Hunt, Martin Rowley and Waghorn.

Richard

Nice to know thanks.

***

From the CRU pdf:

We have records back many centuries in some regions -millennia for Italy and
Japan because of the existence of written records -but in many regions such as

(where it is according to the article, most important)
the North Pacific and large parts of the tropics, direct evidence is limited.

Fortunately, the material in the veils eventually falls to Earth and an
excellent record is preserved on the ice caps of Greenland and Antarctica..

(All else being equal, that means the effects of the declinations of Jupiter and Saturn not being a factor in the eruption of volcanoes or in the overall temperatures of the planet. And we know that they are not because?)

We may not know where the eruption occurred but the frequency can be compared over several millennia. (Provided as I said: Dah dah, dah dah, dah dah dumb.)

***

Ah wait a minute...
I posted a method for location of likely eruptions forecast by these very people. How dare they ignore me?
Cheeky *******s!

Well they would be if they hadn't gone. Hmmmm... 2 Corinthians 11:17. Such is the flesh.

On Sunday, 6 March 2016 19:20:30 UTC, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Anytime anywhe
Between noon Sunday and Tuesday evening according to the aptly named BoM:

http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/char...Refresh+ View

5.5 and rising:

Datetude Timetude Latitude Longitude Magnitude Attitude

2016/03/08 at 05:36. 15.1 S. 173.4 W. 5.8 Mb. Tonga Islands
2016/03/05 at 18:45. 33.1 S. 178.2 W. 5.5 M. South of Kermadec Islands

2016/03/05 at 18:45. 33.1 S. 178.2 W. M. 5.5. S.of Kermadec Islands
2016/03/03 at 08:36. 9.8 S. 125.3 E. Mb. 5.5. Timor, Indonesia

Two days and ten hours. What's going to split that wand between them?
https://youtu.be/pyZD7eoHZT8

Judging by it's nature I should think it is going to be a line-storm. So the step in between tropical storms and Volcanic Strombolicic is about 2 1/2 days?

But what of the period of nothingness is that down to Strombolii?

What is going on here is more than likely more of the same marked in steps. That first one indicating the last one and this second, what is to be. It goes with saying that I wish to quoted not. Except by Stoopid, he can say what he likes (it's in his psyche.)