Weather Banter

Weather Banter (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/)
-   uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/uk-sci-weather-uk-weather/)
-   -   O/T Windows Warfare (https://www.weather-banter.co.uk/uk-sci-weather-uk-weather/8391-o-t-windows-warfare.html)

keith.r.harris October 12th 04 12:16 PM

O/T Windows Warfare
 
http://www.channel4.com/news/2004/10...9_windows.html

A little bit worrying to say the least.

Keith (Southend)

http://www.southendweather.net




cupra October 12th 04 12:40 PM

O/T Windows Warfare
 
keith.r.harris wrote:
http://www.channel4.com/news/2004/10...9_windows.html

A little bit worrying to say the least.

Keith (Southend)

http://www.southendweather.net


We use XP/2000 for our automation motion control systems - using a PCI card with embedded processors. If windows crashes, the card still runs and the machine still functions - I assume there will be similar controls on military hardware (and indeed dual redundancy as in oil rigs etc.).

Brian Wakem October 12th 04 04:44 PM

O/T Windows Warfare
 
keith.r.harris wrote:

http://www.channel4.com/news/2004/10...9_windows.html

A little bit worrying to say the least.

Keith (Southend)

http://www.southendweather.net



hmmm - Lets put the most insecure operating system on the market on the
systems which need the greatest security.

There must have been some very hefty brown envelopes exchanged.


--
Brian Wakem


Dave Ludlow October 12th 04 05:31 PM

O/T Windows Warfare
 
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:44:47 +0100, Brian Wakem wrote:

keith.r.harris wrote:

http://www.channel4.com/news/2004/10...9_windows.html

A little bit worrying to say the least.


hmmm - Lets put the most insecure operating system on the market on the
systems which need the greatest security.

They admit it themselves - it's the reason they won't put Windows in
the nuclear subs. So they are only half stupid...

--
Dave

Edward Milan October 13th 04 06:36 AM

O/T Windows Warfare
 
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:31:47 +0100, Dave Ludlow
wrote:

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 17:44:47 +0100, Brian Wakem wrote:

keith.r.harris wrote:

http://www.channel4.com/news/2004/10...9_windows.html

A little bit worrying to say the least.


hmmm - Lets put the most insecure operating system on the market on the
systems which need the greatest security.

They admit it themselves - it's the reason they won't put Windows in
the nuclear subs. So they are only half stupid...




They would be useful for fish watching on long underwater stints!



Graham P Davis October 14th 04 08:27 AM

O/T Windows Warfare
 
keith.r.harris wrote:
http://www.channel4.com/news/2004/10...9_windows.html

A little bit worrying to say the least.

Keith (Southend)

http://www.southendweather.net




Brings a new meaning to the "blue screen of death".

Graham


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk