Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:31:39 -0000, "Col"
wrote: Col listens but will not be dictated to as to who he is allowed to reply to. As it seems to be a dialogue, why not take it to e-mail? -- Alan White Twenty-eight miles NW of Glasgow, overlooking Loch Goil and Loch Long in Argyll, Scotland. Web cam and weather:- http://www.windycroft.gt-britain.co....her/kabcam.htm Web site:- http://www.alan.lesley.ukgateway.net |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan White wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:31:39 -0000, "Col" wrote: Col listens but will not be dictated to as to who he is allowed to reply to. As it seems to be a dialogue, why not take it to e-mail? Can you see that happening? I can't. There's an exhibitionist streak to both of them in that they enjoy being the centre of attention, and this "dialogue" seems to their way of doing it. Col, listen, for the good of the newsgroup. Having this "I will not be dictated to" attitude is being selfish. There's more reading and lurking than you think, making out you can do as you please is doing you no favours whatsoever and makes you look foolish. Have some respect for everyone else's wishes and ignore the windup merchant Damien, cos thats what he is. Respect the wishes of the majority. -- Rob Overfield Hull http://www.astrosport02.karoo.net/YorkshireWeather/ |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan White wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:31:39 -0000, "Col" wrote: Col listens but will not be dictated to as to who he is allowed to reply to. As it seems to be a dialogue, why not take it to e-mail? Can you see that happening? I can't. There's an exhibitionist streak to both of them in that they enjoy being the centre of attention, and this "dialogue" seems to their way of doing it. Col, listen, for the good of the newsgroup. Having this "I will not be dictated to" attitude is being selfish. There's more reading and lurking than you think, making out you can do as you please is doing you no favours whatsoever and makes you look foolish. Have some respect for everyone else's wishes and ignore the windup merchant Damien, cos thats what he is. Respect the wishes of the majority. -- Rob Overfield Hull http://www.astrosport02.karoo.net/YorkshireWeather/ |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan White wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:31:39 -0000, "Col" wrote: Col listens but will not be dictated to as to who he is allowed to reply to. As it seems to be a dialogue, why not take it to e-mail? Can you see that happening? I can't. There's an exhibitionist streak to both of them in that they enjoy being the centre of attention, and this "dialogue" seems to their way of doing it. Col, listen, for the good of the newsgroup. Having this "I will not be dictated to" attitude is being selfish. There's more reading and lurking than you think, making out you can do as you please is doing you no favours whatsoever and makes you look foolish. Have some respect for everyone else's wishes and ignore the windup merchant Damien, cos thats what he is. Respect the wishes of the majority. -- Rob Overfield Hull http://www.astrosport02.karoo.net/YorkshireWeather/ |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan White wrote:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 11:31:39 -0000, "Col" wrote: Col listens but will not be dictated to as to who he is allowed to reply to. As it seems to be a dialogue, why not take it to e-mail? Can you see that happening? I can't. There's an exhibitionist streak to both of them in that they enjoy being the centre of attention, and this "dialogue" seems to their way of doing it. Col, listen, for the good of the newsgroup. Having this "I will not be dictated to" attitude is being selfish. There's more reading and lurking than you think, making out you can do as you please is doing you no favours whatsoever and makes you look foolish. Have some respect for everyone else's wishes and ignore the windup merchant Damien, cos thats what he is. Respect the wishes of the majority. -- Rob Overfield Hull http://www.astrosport02.karoo.net/YorkshireWeather/ |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob Overfield wrote:
Can you not reply to Mr Damien please? If you want your entertainment at his expense, do it in a place where we don't have to read it. You may enjoy what you're doing, those who have killfiled him, like myself, do not wish to see anything with his name on it. We want to read the WR's, discuss OBS and argue the finer point of forecasting, we don't want to read your needling of the boy and his responses. As neither this kindly approach, nor my rather more vulgar 'see how it feels' approach yesterday will have the desired effect, I have taken the advice offered elsewhere in this thread and added some more names to my killfile. To those good and sensible members of this group (i.e. those not resident in my killfile) I would like to say that if my approach yesterday caused offence to any of you then I am sorry. (I suppose that different people react differently when frustrated, particularly when some of the produce of Puglia is involved.) It is looking much sunnier now (-: -- Gianna Stefani www.buchan-meteo.org.uk |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob Overfield wrote:
Can you not reply to Mr Damien please? If you want your entertainment at his expense, do it in a place where we don't have to read it. You may enjoy what you're doing, those who have killfiled him, like myself, do not wish to see anything with his name on it. We want to read the WR's, discuss OBS and argue the finer point of forecasting, we don't want to read your needling of the boy and his responses. As neither this kindly approach, nor my rather more vulgar 'see how it feels' approach yesterday will have the desired effect, I have taken the advice offered elsewhere in this thread and added some more names to my killfile. To those good and sensible members of this group (i.e. those not resident in my killfile) I would like to say that if my approach yesterday caused offence to any of you then I am sorry. (I suppose that different people react differently when frustrated, particularly when some of the produce of Puglia is involved.) It is looking much sunnier now (-: -- Gianna Stefani www.buchan-meteo.org.uk |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob Overfield wrote:
Can you not reply to Mr Damien please? If you want your entertainment at his expense, do it in a place where we don't have to read it. You may enjoy what you're doing, those who have killfiled him, like myself, do not wish to see anything with his name on it. We want to read the WR's, discuss OBS and argue the finer point of forecasting, we don't want to read your needling of the boy and his responses. As neither this kindly approach, nor my rather more vulgar 'see how it feels' approach yesterday will have the desired effect, I have taken the advice offered elsewhere in this thread and added some more names to my killfile. To those good and sensible members of this group (i.e. those not resident in my killfile) I would like to say that if my approach yesterday caused offence to any of you then I am sorry. (I suppose that different people react differently when frustrated, particularly when some of the produce of Puglia is involved.) It is looking much sunnier now (-: -- Gianna Stefani www.buchan-meteo.org.uk |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rob Overfield wrote:
Can you not reply to Mr Damien please? If you want your entertainment at his expense, do it in a place where we don't have to read it. You may enjoy what you're doing, those who have killfiled him, like myself, do not wish to see anything with his name on it. We want to read the WR's, discuss OBS and argue the finer point of forecasting, we don't want to read your needling of the boy and his responses. As neither this kindly approach, nor my rather more vulgar 'see how it feels' approach yesterday will have the desired effect, I have taken the advice offered elsewhere in this thread and added some more names to my killfile. To those good and sensible members of this group (i.e. those not resident in my killfile) I would like to say that if my approach yesterday caused offence to any of you then I am sorry. (I suppose that different people react differently when frustrated, particularly when some of the produce of Puglia is involved.) It is looking much sunnier now (-: -- Gianna Stefani www.buchan-meteo.org.uk |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Come on Col (and Lawrence for the matter). This has gone far too far. Damien
is an utter idiot and doesn't deserve the respect or a reply from anyone. I am big enough to admit that I was daft enough to respond and provoke, but I'm not going to bother anymore. This has nothing to do with the weather, of which there has been plenty to stimulate some interesting posts. It's not about dictating to you either Col, if you wan't to continue responding to Damien, great, but just find another forum. You are the sort of guy we do want on this ng, because the bulk of your posts are relevant and interesting. Incidentally, I have a degree, meet MP's on a one to one basis regularly etc etc, isn't that interesting!!! -- David Mitchell, 70m amsl, Langtoft, East Riding of Yorkshire. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
attn counter-intuitive active spam | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
Attn: Damien | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Attn Martin aka JPG | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
ATTN: AV Brief Users. | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Attn: Government tornado forecasters Apr. 21, 2004 | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |