Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello everybody,
The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. If yellowstone goes up, they'll be plenty of snow for everyone! Joe Wolverhampton 175 asl |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. If yellowstone goes up, they'll be plenty of snow for everyone! Joe Wolverhampton 175 asl |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. If yellowstone goes up, they'll be plenty of snow for everyone! Joe Wolverhampton 175 asl |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. If yellowstone goes up, they'll be plenty of snow for everyone! Joe Wolverhampton 175 asl |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding is that temperature has not changed at the summit, it's
still around -7^c The reason there is less snow and ice is due to there being far less moisture in the atmosphere at that location, so what we are seeing is a sort of dry melt. This of course could still be related to global warming, just not from a temperature point of view. Shaun Pudwell. "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding is that temperature has not changed at the summit, it's
still around -7^c The reason there is less snow and ice is due to there being far less moisture in the atmosphere at that location, so what we are seeing is a sort of dry melt. This of course could still be related to global warming, just not from a temperature point of view. Shaun Pudwell. "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding is that temperature has not changed at the summit, it's
still around -7^c The reason there is less snow and ice is due to there being far less moisture in the atmosphere at that location, so what we are seeing is a sort of dry melt. This of course could still be related to global warming, just not from a temperature point of view. Shaun Pudwell. "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My understanding is that temperature has not changed at the summit, it's
still around -7^c The reason there is less snow and ice is due to there being far less moisture in the atmosphere at that location, so what we are seeing is a sort of dry melt. This of course could still be related to global warming, just not from a temperature point of view. Shaun Pudwell. "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a well known fact that Global Warming is responsible for every weather
phenomena that has occured since 1989. Certainly all the wet and dry winters in the UK were caused by the aforementioned, and the up coming drought over southern England will definitely be due to that. Therefore it stands to reason that the lack of snow on Kilimanjaro will be down to the same reason...... RonB (founder of the Ostrich club) "Tudor Hughes" wrote in message ups.com... Hello everybody, The front of Monday's Guardian has a large photo of the summit of Kilimanjaro without much snow, and the caption suggests that it now has less snow than at any time in the last 11,000 years and this is due to Global Warming and has occurred 15 years ahead of the predicted time and isn't it dreadful. I wonder how much of this is true. I have read elsewhere that the mountain has less snow on it now due to the climate simply being drier. How much of a change in temperature has there been near the equator at the 500 mb level, just about the height of Kilimanjaro? And has it got drier recently? There is no doubt the world is a warmer place than it was 100 years ago but by less than 1°C. Is that enough on its own to remove the snow from Kilimanjaro? On the other hand there are large variations in precipitation amounts over periods of decades, particularly in low latitudes, eg the Sahel. Does anyone have any figures relating to this? Tudor Hughes, Warlingham, Surrey. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Blatant Media Bias On Kilimanjaro | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Kilimanjaro Defies Profit of Doom | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
MAPINFO PRO V7.5, TNT V6.8 MICROIMAGES, IDRISI KILIMANJARO 14.0.1, PCI GEOMATICA V9.0 - PCI GEOMATICS [6 CDs], Esri ArcGIS Desktop v 8.3 [3 CDs],ArcGIS Workstation v8.3 [2 CDs], MapObjects Java Edition v2.0, ARC SDE V8.3 Client, ARC SDE V8.3 for Cove | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |