Monday, 13 December 2004

BRACKNELL (TF)
0900 ESE F2 2800 BR 8/ST T014D-001
RMK: NIL
[ OVERNIGHT DATA (18Z - 09Z):
screen min: 01.4 grass min: 01.3 precipitation: NIL
other data: 2 clear weeks with no measurable rain ]=


--
Martin Rowley: data via -
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/metindex.htm
Bracknell (Wooden Hill/Tawfield), Berkshire
NGR: SU 854 667 Elev: 80m
Lat: 51DEG23MIN30SEC(N): Long: 00DEG46MIN28SEC(W)

Monday, 13 December 2004

BRACKNELL (TF)
0900 ESE F2 2800 BR 8/ST T014D-001
RMK: NIL
[ OVERNIGHT DATA (18Z - 09Z):
screen min: 01.4 grass min: 01.3 precipitation: NIL
other data: 2 clear weeks with no measurable rain ]=

BRACKNELL (TF)
1500 SE F1 3500 HZ 8/ST T018D001
RMK: Visibility (the 3500 in above report), hasn't been above 4000M all
day; day maximum sitting at +1.9degC presently: stratus (ST) base
somewhere around 800ft (E)=

Notes:

The basic first-line format is:-
[Time/GMT]
[Wind direction .. compass points]
[Wind speed .. Beaufort force]
[Visibility .. metres / 9999 = 10km]
[Weather groups .. if any]
[Cloud layers .. amount/type]
[Screen temperature/T .. degrees/tenths]
[Dewpoint temp/D .. degrees/tenths]

--
Martin Rowley: data via -
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/metindex.htm
Bracknell (Wooden Hill/Tawfield), Berkshire
NGR: SU 854 667 Elev: 80m
Lat: 51DEG23MIN30SEC(N): Long: 00DEG46MIN28SEC(W)

"Martin Rowley" wrote in
message


BRACKNELL (TF)
1500 SE F1 3500 HZ 8/ST T018D001
RMK: Visibility (the 3500 in above report), hasn't been above 4000M all
day; day maximum sitting at +1.9degC presently: stratus (ST) base
somewhere around 800ft (E)=

What do you expect your min. to be tonight, Martin ?

Jon.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Martin Rowley wrote:
The basic first-line format is:-
[Time/GMT]
[Wind direction .. compass points]
[Wind speed .. Beaufort force]
[Visibility .. metres / 9999 = 10km]
[Weather groups .. if any]
[Cloud layers .. amount/type]
[Screen temperature/T .. degrees/tenths]
[Dewpoint temp/D .. degrees/tenths]

Many thanks for this little nugget of info - I'd been taking ages getting
up the courage to ask what they meant!

--
Nick Humphries, via OBD
Your Sinclair Rock'n'Roll Years - http://www.ysrnry.co.uk
YSRnRY documentary - http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/tvprog/
The Tipshop - http://www.the-tipshop.co.uk/

"Jon O Rourke" wrote in message
news:3b714a737a94ac510e554053763fd718.62236@mygate .mailgate.org...

What do you expect your min. to be tonight, Martin ?


.... tell me what the cloud cover is going to be ;-)

Martin.

"Martin Rowley" wrote in
message


"Jon O Rourke" wrote in message
news:3b714a737a94ac510e554053763fd718.62236@mygate .mailgate.org...

What do you expect your min. to be tonight, Martin ?


... tell me what the cloud cover is going to be ;-)


8/8 500ft ish.

Jon.






--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Jon O Rourke" wrote in message
news:2722c35159738a94b49abb115a9059e1.62236@mygate .mailgate.org...
... tell me what the cloud cover is going to be ;-)


8/8 500ft ish.


.... if it holds at that, and the gradient picks up a shade as the models
want (by the end of the night), I'll go for MS0.2degC: However, I note
that 03882 the cloud is mighty thin, and if the gradient does pick up,
it could fragment quite quickly?

Martin.

"Martin Rowley" wrote in
message


... if it holds at that, and the gradient picks up a shade as the models
want (by the end of the night), I'll go for MS0.2degC: However, I note
that 03882 the cloud is mighty thin, and if the gradient does pick up,
it could fragment quite quickly?

Martin.

That'll do me. Frost warning covers PS01 to MS01. 03882 was thin but
the 13Z 03743 revealved a deeper boundary layer, thus I don't think
they'll be much in the way of breaks in the south, nor fog, hopefully
:-)

Jon.




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Jon O Rourke" wrote in message
news:8254e7280876dcaf789194009cbda1bc.62236@mygate .mailgate.org...
the 13Z 03743 revealved a deeper boundary layer, thus I don't think
they'll be much in the way of breaks in the south, nor fog, hopefully

.... that's the key - there must be a dividing line somewhere around here
between the ex-continental stuff and our home-grown boundary layer
clag - hence the DZ atm (DZ = drizzle); a "mini-front" (oh - smack
hands!)

Martin.

Monday, 13 December 2004

BRACKNELL (TF)
1500 SE F1 3500 HZ 8/ST T018D001
RMK: Visibility (the 3500 in above report), hasn't been above 4000M all
day; day maximum sitting at +1.9degC presently: stratus (ST) base
somewhere around 800ft (E)=

BRACKNELL (TF)
1800 NE F2 2000 -DZ BR 8/ST T017D005
RMK: -DZ (slight drizzle) since circa 1630Z; the precipitation very
light - just fine damping on the face and visible in torch beam; ST base
circa 500/600ft; visibility reduction due to mist (BR) rather than
drizzle.
[ DAYTIME DATA (09Z - 18Z):
screen max: 01.9 precipitation: tr ]=

Notes:

The basic first-line format is:-
[Time/GMT]
[Wind direction .. compass points]
[Wind speed .. Beaufort force]
[Visibility .. metres / 9999 = 10km]
[Weather groups .. if any]
[Cloud layers .. amount/type]
[Screen temperature/T .. degrees/tenths]
[Dewpoint temp/D .. degrees/tenths]

--
Martin Rowley: data via -
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/booty.weather/metindex.htm
Bracknell (Wooden Hill/Tawfield), Berkshire
NGR: SU 854 667 Elev: 80m
Lat: 51DEG23MIN30SEC(N): Long: 00DEG46MIN28SEC(W)