uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 09:03 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2003
Posts: 328
Default email attack?

Paul Hyett wrote:

I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see
these spam floods, thank goodness.


How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam?

--
Jonathan Stott
Canterbury Weather: http://www.canterburyweather.co.uk/

  #32   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 09:36 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 170
Default email attack?

In message , Joe Egginton
writes
You must be damn lucky Pete. I get tons of spam to my e-mail address I
use as a return address when I post to newsgroups.

I use a 'throwaway', but real yahoo email address for newsgroup postings
and it works very well. Better than using a 'munged' address, and most
of the spam generated by the newsgroup postings just goes straight into
the bulk folder on yahoo. I check for mail fairly regularly just in case
anything genuine goes in, but don't use the yahoo address for any
personal mail, so that doesn't happen often. I also use the yahoo
address if I need to register for anything online that I'm not 100 per
cent sure of.
--
Anita Evans
North Cumbria (please reply to )
  #33   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 09:36 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 170
Default email attack?

In message , Joe Egginton
writes
You must be damn lucky Pete. I get tons of spam to my e-mail address I
use as a return address when I post to newsgroups.

I use a 'throwaway', but real yahoo email address for newsgroup postings
and it works very well. Better than using a 'munged' address, and most
of the spam generated by the newsgroup postings just goes straight into
the bulk folder on yahoo. I check for mail fairly regularly just in case
anything genuine goes in, but don't use the yahoo address for any
personal mail, so that doesn't happen often. I also use the yahoo
address if I need to register for anything online that I'm not 100 per
cent sure of.
--
Anita Evans
North Cumbria (please reply to )
  #34   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 09:36 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2003
Posts: 170
Default email attack?

In message , Joe Egginton
writes
You must be damn lucky Pete. I get tons of spam to my e-mail address I
use as a return address when I post to newsgroups.

I use a 'throwaway', but real yahoo email address for newsgroup postings
and it works very well. Better than using a 'munged' address, and most
of the spam generated by the newsgroup postings just goes straight into
the bulk folder on yahoo. I check for mail fairly regularly just in case
anything genuine goes in, but don't use the yahoo address for any
personal mail, so that doesn't happen often. I also use the yahoo
address if I need to register for anything online that I'm not 100 per
cent sure of.
--
Anita Evans
North Cumbria (please reply to )
  #35   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 11:57 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 161
Default email attack?

In article , dated Mon, 16 May 2005,
Jonathan Stott wrote
Paul Hyett wrote:

I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see
these spam floods, thank goodness.


How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam?

Turnpike has a very useful feature which rejects without downloading
anything addressed to an email name which you have blacklisted, and/or
one it doesn't recognise. This means that only stuff addressed to
current valid names gets through into the mailboxes. Which is all very
well if you're on broadband, you hardly notice the time it takes to
bounce 1000 rubbish mails - I unfortunately was travelling when I got
hit, and doing this via dial-up, though still quicker than trying to use
Outlook or Outlook Express, was not fun.
--
Kate B

PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne if you want
to reply personally


  #36   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 11:57 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 161
Default email attack?

In article , dated Mon, 16 May 2005,
Jonathan Stott wrote
Paul Hyett wrote:

I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see
these spam floods, thank goodness.


How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam?

Turnpike has a very useful feature which rejects without downloading
anything addressed to an email name which you have blacklisted, and/or
one it doesn't recognise. This means that only stuff addressed to
current valid names gets through into the mailboxes. Which is all very
well if you're on broadband, you hardly notice the time it takes to
bounce 1000 rubbish mails - I unfortunately was travelling when I got
hit, and doing this via dial-up, though still quicker than trying to use
Outlook or Outlook Express, was not fun.
--
Kate B

PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne if you want
to reply personally
  #37   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 11:57 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2005
Posts: 161
Default email attack?

In article , dated Mon, 16 May 2005,
Jonathan Stott wrote
Paul Hyett wrote:

I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see
these spam floods, thank goodness.


How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam?

Turnpike has a very useful feature which rejects without downloading
anything addressed to an email name which you have blacklisted, and/or
one it doesn't recognise. This means that only stuff addressed to
current valid names gets through into the mailboxes. Which is all very
well if you're on broadband, you hardly notice the time it takes to
bounce 1000 rubbish mails - I unfortunately was travelling when I got
hit, and doing this via dial-up, though still quicker than trying to use
Outlook or Outlook Express, was not fun.
--
Kate B

PS 'elvira' is spamtrapped - please reply to 'elviraspam' at cockaigne if you want
to reply personally
  #38   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 06:21 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2003
Posts: 978
Default email attack?

In uk.sci.weather on Mon, 16 May 2005 at 09:03:01, Jonathan Stott wrote
:
Paul Hyett wrote:

I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see
these spam floods, thank goodness.


How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam?


You can stop all those of the type

I've set it up to block anything other than my exact email address. That
seems to block 99% of spam.
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham


  #39   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 06:21 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2003
Posts: 978
Default email attack?

In uk.sci.weather on Mon, 16 May 2005 at 09:03:01, Jonathan Stott wrote
:
Paul Hyett wrote:

I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see
these spam floods, thank goodness.


How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam?


You can stop all those of the type

I've set it up to block anything other than my exact email address. That
seems to block 99% of spam.
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham
  #40   Report Post  
Old May 16th 05, 06:21 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Oct 2003
Posts: 978
Default email attack?

In uk.sci.weather on Mon, 16 May 2005 at 09:03:01, Jonathan Stott wrote
:
Paul Hyett wrote:

I collect mail via POP3 now (using Turnpike), so I never get to see
these spam floods, thank goodness.


How is collecting email using POP3 going to stop spam?


You can stop all those of the type

I've set it up to block anything other than my exact email address. That
seems to block 99% of spam.
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BBC email David Haggas uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 26 November 8th 07 10:12 AM
A Killer Email Message - How to Write Killer Email Promos that Get Results RED alt.binaries.pictures.weather (Weather Photos) 0 October 3rd 07 10:42 AM
Email alerts for severe weather warnings? Robert Wilson uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 1 June 11th 07 04:47 PM
A very nice email response... Rob Overfield uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 44 February 25th 05 04:44 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017