General Von Clinkerhoffen wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/threecounties/w...st/index.shtml

This is supposed to show the weather in Beds Herts & Bucks, half of
bucks is cut off, and I didn't know that Norwich and Boston we in my
local area!

I've complained but I'm not holding my breath.


Dave Liquorice wrote:
Oh dear they really are struggling with getting towns in the right
place aren't they. Be quick and take a look at:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cumbria/weather...st/index.shtml

Berwick-upon-Tweed is, in reality, on the east coast to the ESE of
Edinburgh, roughly where the d of tweed is... Currently it's shown
as
somewhere near Lanark! Barrow isn't quite right either.

Has no one with a map checked the coordinates for towns in the
places
overlay? I notice on the TV the blobs weeble and wobble about a
pixel
her a pixel there as the view zooms about. Haven't they heard of
anti-aliasing?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/shropshire/weat...st/index.shtml

Luton is now in Shropshire. As are Liverpool, Grimsby (or is that in
the sea?) and London.
Actually that's the same as the "Midlands" map I have come to hate for
omuitting everything west of the M6.

Edmund

General Von Clinkerhoffen wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/threecounties/w...st/index.shtml

This is supposed to show the weather in Beds Herts & Bucks, half of
bucks is cut off, and I didn't know that Norwich and Boston we in my
local area!

I've complained but I'm not holding my breath.


Dave Liquorice wrote:
Oh dear they really are struggling with getting towns in the right
place aren't they. Be quick and take a look at:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cumbria/weather...st/index.shtml

Berwick-upon-Tweed is, in reality, on the east coast to the ESE of
Edinburgh, roughly where the d of tweed is... Currently it's shown
as
somewhere near Lanark! Barrow isn't quite right either.

Has no one with a map checked the coordinates for towns in the
places
overlay? I notice on the TV the blobs weeble and wobble about a
pixel
her a pixel there as the view zooms about. Haven't they heard of
anti-aliasing?


http://www.bbc.co.uk/shropshire/weat...st/index.shtml

Luton is now in Shropshire. As are Liverpool, Grimsby (or is that in
the sea?) and London.
Actually that's the same as the "Midlands" map I have come to hate for
omuitting everything west of the M6.

Edmund

On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:36:52 +0100, Peter Hayes wrote:

Oh dear they really are struggling with getting towns in the right
place aren't they. Be quick

No need to rush, it's still wrong 12 hours later.

I think Berwick was a new place on the map, compared to earlier in the
week. At least I haven't noticed it before.

As always, if they can't get the simple details correct it makes the
rest worthless.

Having thought about this a bit more I wonder if it's programming
funny. The names are an overlay on the map and weather symbols. I
suspect there is a bit of software that checks that a name fits within
the image and shifts the name left or right if it doesn't but when it
does so it doesn't shift the blob to the other end of the name. This
would explain why the d of tweed is in about the right place and if
you went right from the the name wouldn't fit.

Are the temps correct? Are the rainfall blobs in the correct place?

Well for today no. Last nights forecast gave the impression with all
the puddles and drops that it would be raining all day. We've had one
short spell of heavy rain and a bit of dampness, not the non-stop
stuff...

--
Cheers
Dave. pam is missing e-mail

On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:36:52 +0100, Peter Hayes wrote:

Oh dear they really are struggling with getting towns in the right
place aren't they. Be quick

No need to rush, it's still wrong 12 hours later.

I think Berwick was a new place on the map, compared to earlier in the
week. At least I haven't noticed it before.

As always, if they can't get the simple details correct it makes the
rest worthless.

Having thought about this a bit more I wonder if it's programming
funny. The names are an overlay on the map and weather symbols. I
suspect there is a bit of software that checks that a name fits within
the image and shifts the name left or right if it doesn't but when it
does so it doesn't shift the blob to the other end of the name. This
would explain why the d of tweed is in about the right place and if
you went right from the the name wouldn't fit.

Are the temps correct? Are the rainfall blobs in the correct place?

Well for today no. Last nights forecast gave the impression with all
the puddles and drops that it would be raining all day. We've had one
short spell of heavy rain and a bit of dampness, not the non-stop
stuff...

--
Cheers
Dave. pam is missing e-mail

On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:36:52 +0100, Peter Hayes wrote:

Oh dear they really are struggling with getting towns in the right
place aren't they. Be quick

No need to rush, it's still wrong 12 hours later.

I think Berwick was a new place on the map, compared to earlier in the
week. At least I haven't noticed it before.

As always, if they can't get the simple details correct it makes the
rest worthless.

Having thought about this a bit more I wonder if it's programming
funny. The names are an overlay on the map and weather symbols. I
suspect there is a bit of software that checks that a name fits within
the image and shifts the name left or right if it doesn't but when it
does so it doesn't shift the blob to the other end of the name. This
would explain why the d of tweed is in about the right place and if
you went right from the the name wouldn't fit.

Are the temps correct? Are the rainfall blobs in the correct place?

Well for today no. Last nights forecast gave the impression with all
the puddles and drops that it would be raining all day. We've had one
short spell of heavy rain and a bit of dampness, not the non-stop
stuff...

--
Cheers
Dave. pam is missing e-mail

Luton is now in Shropshire. As are Liverpool, Grimsby (or is that in
the sea?) and London.

At least Liverpool is in the right place on that map! (see my previous post
on this thread)

--
================================================== ===================
Ace Internet | http://www.ace-internet.co.uk
Internet Connectivity | ADSL | Web Hosting | Domain names
t: 0870 740 7555 | f: 0870 740 5335 | e:
================================================== ===================

Luton is now in Shropshire. As are Liverpool, Grimsby (or is that in
the sea?) and London.

At least Liverpool is in the right place on that map! (see my previous post
on this thread)

--
================================================== ===================
Ace Internet | http://www.ace-internet.co.uk
Internet Connectivity | ADSL | Web Hosting | Domain names
t: 0870 740 7555 | f: 0870 740 5335 | e:
================================================== ===================

Luton is now in Shropshire. As are Liverpool, Grimsby (or is that in
the sea?) and London.

At least Liverpool is in the right place on that map! (see my previous post
on this thread)

--
================================================== ===================
Ace Internet | http://www.ace-internet.co.uk
Internet Connectivity | ADSL | Web Hosting | Domain names
t: 0870 740 7555 | f: 0870 740 5335 | e:
================================================== ===================

Dave Liquorice wrote:

On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:36:52 +0100, Peter Hayes wrote:

Oh dear they really are struggling with getting towns in the right
place aren't they. Be quick

No need to rush, it's still wrong 12 hours later.

I think Berwick was a new place on the map, compared to earlier in the
week. At least I haven't noticed it before.

As always, if they can't get the simple details correct it makes the
rest worthless.

Having thought about this a bit more I wonder if it's programming
funny. The names are an overlay on the map and weather symbols. I
suspect there is a bit of software that checks that a name fits within
the image and shifts the name left or right if it doesn't but when it
does so it doesn't shift the blob to the other end of the name. This
would explain why the d of tweed is in about the right place and if
you went right from the the name wouldn't fit.

It did cross my mind that yesterday was strike day at the Beeb so maybe
the producer's 5 year old kid had been drafted in to do the maps.

But seriously, they've probably got a stock of names pre-programmed for
inclusion, and if so then there's some pretty shoddy work.

Are the temps correct? Are the rainfall blobs in the correct place?

Well for today no. Last nights forecast gave the impression with all
the puddles and drops that it would be raining all day. We've had one
short spell of heavy rain and a bit of dampness, not the non-stop
stuff...

Once they've included glaringly basic errors they've disconnected with
the audience - or at least that much of the audience that spots the
errors.

--

Peter

Dave Liquorice wrote:

On Tue, 24 May 2005 09:36:52 +0100, Peter Hayes wrote:

Oh dear they really are struggling with getting towns in the right
place aren't they. Be quick

No need to rush, it's still wrong 12 hours later.

I think Berwick was a new place on the map, compared to earlier in the
week. At least I haven't noticed it before.

As always, if they can't get the simple details correct it makes the
rest worthless.

Having thought about this a bit more I wonder if it's programming
funny. The names are an overlay on the map and weather symbols. I
suspect there is a bit of software that checks that a name fits within
the image and shifts the name left or right if it doesn't but when it
does so it doesn't shift the blob to the other end of the name. This
would explain why the d of tweed is in about the right place and if
you went right from the the name wouldn't fit.

It did cross my mind that yesterday was strike day at the Beeb so maybe
the producer's 5 year old kid had been drafted in to do the maps.

But seriously, they've probably got a stock of names pre-programmed for
inclusion, and if so then there's some pretty shoddy work.

Are the temps correct? Are the rainfall blobs in the correct place?

Well for today no. Last nights forecast gave the impression with all
the puddles and drops that it would be raining all day. We've had one
short spell of heavy rain and a bit of dampness, not the non-stop
stuff...

Once they've included glaringly basic errors they've disconnected with
the audience - or at least that much of the audience that spots the
errors.

--

Peter