Odd behaviour on this site:

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.html

As well as the cloud remarkably similar in nature to the ones discussed
in a recent thread on this subject (on sci.geo.earthquakes) that seems
to have held station over the Andes all through the sequences shown,
there is a strange blip over the Indian Ocean on the 13th at 12:00 UT.

Anyone here know of a similar data-base so that glitches in the above
site can be eliminated? I've written to the administrators about it. I
wouldn't blame them for ignoring me, though.

Come to look a little closer at the Indonesian cloudscapes there does
seem to be another anomaly there too under the other clouds.

Monday, June 13, 2005 at 22:44:33 (UTC)

Monday, June 13, 2005 at 6:44:33 PM = local time at epicenter

TARAPACA, CHILE 19.896°S, 69.125°W Magnitude 7.9



--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Michael Mcneil" wrote:

Odd behaviour on this site:

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.html

As well as the cloud remarkably similar in nature to the ones discussed
in a recent thread on this subject (on sci.geo.earthquakes) that seems
to have held station over the Andes all through the sequences shown,
there is a strange blip over the Indian Ocean on the 13th at 12:00 UT.

Anyone here know of a similar data-base so that glitches in the above
site can be eliminated?

No, but here's a picture of some pretty balloons:

http://www.dfparty.co.uk/images/balloons.jpg

In fact, why not just call this thread "Earthquakes & Pretty
Balloons"?

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
news:f88a03099cb362655b5e6165fab88819.45219@mygate .mailgate.org...


there is a strange blip over the Indian Ocean on the 13th at 12:00 UT.

It's missing one frame from one Geostationary satellite at that time; the
image is produced as a composite of the images from all the various
geostationary weather satellites.

How is that not obvious?

"John Krempasky" wrote in message
...

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in message
news:f88a03099cb362655b5e6165fab88819.45219@mygate .mailgate.org...


there is a strange blip over the Indian Ocean on the 13th at 12:00 UT.

It's missing one frame from one Geostationary satellite at that time; the
image is produced as a composite of the images from all the various
geostationary weather satellites.

How is that not obvious?



You are assuming that McNut is sane. I wouldn't do that if I were you.
It's not healthy.

"John Krempasky" wrote in message


It's missing one frame from one Geostationary satellite at that time; the
image is produced as a composite of the images from all the various
geostationary weather satellites.

Quite right. Any comment about the other thing? Or do you suppose they
are a standard featuture for the time of the year?

I got this back from the site owners:

We have a few global Molleweide images at
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/ otherwise, we don't have the
resources to archive the Web site products. Note that the images are not
meant for serious research: http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/cmoll.html and
are provided freely to the general public for education and general
knowledge. They should NOT be used to prove anything.

Which is why I asked for alternative sites after all.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

DURING A BRIEF SEARCH FOR TIME INTERVALS FROM THE SALT LAKE CAL QUAKES
TO PR AND BEYOND-NOAA (BELOW NATIONAL HURRICANE SERVICE-SEARCH) HAD
CLOUDS LIKE THE GULF-BIRDY PHENOMENA Eq CLOUDS I OBSERVE.

MY REACTION WAS-YOU'RE GOOFING HERE RIGHT?

but the fog i see may not be visible on radar?
that's the question to answer before running around in uh the fog at
this point-can a light thin fog be seen by ground or sat radar?

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in
news:f88a03099cb362655b5e6165fab88819.45219@mygate .mailgate.org:

Odd behaviour on this site:

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.html

As well as the cloud
Snipola

that seems
to have held station over the Andes all through the sequences shown,
Snipola

You call yourself "weatherlawyer" and are always yapping about
weather stuff. Just how much do you really know about weather?

I suggest you get a good book or two on the topic.

In the case of these clouds you mention, perhaps you should google
around for "orographic lift".

Here, I've even done the hard part for you...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orographic_lift

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism

Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Blog: http://www.skywise711.com/Blog

Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:42:28 -0000, Skywise
wrote:

"Michael Mcneil" wrote in
news:f88a03099cb362655b5e6165fab88819.45219@mygat e.mailgate.org:

Odd behaviour on this site:

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.html

As well as the cloud
Snipola

that seems
to have held station over the Andes all through the sequences shown,
Snipola

You call yourself "weatherlawyer" and are always yapping about
weather stuff. Just how much do you really know about weather?

I suggest you get a good book or two on the topic.

He should start with "The young boys big picture book of clouds" It's
about his level.


In the case of these clouds you mention, perhaps you should google
around for "orographic lift".

Here, I've even done the hard part for you...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orographic_lift

Brian

--

Find out about Australia's most dangerous Doomsday Cult:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese/pebble.htm

Astronomy pages:
http://users.bigpond.net.au/wanglese...Astronomy.html

"You can't fool me, it's turtles all the way down."

Thank you Michael for that simulation across of the whole world, it is
really fascinating.
Further more, the University of Wisconsin is doing a terrific work keeping
all that data updated, and matching it with sea temp and tuti quanti.

Please do not be upset by Georgy Boi, Shywise and Walrus .... Jealousy is
the word which applies to those Dudes re your research ( and definitive
Glaglaciationzz beulieverzz they are to boost )

By the way that reference by Shywise to Orogenic weather patterns ( ref as
orographic lift ) is just hogwash to put you astray. In fact it's simple
plain mechanical uplift leading to precipitation as the moisture reaches dew
point, and as former licensed commercial pilot, I know a bit about that
stuff... and as usual the 3 compères explain nothing !!!

Please again, just ignore those Bougredanes

--
Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud

Australia Mining Pioneer
Exploration Geologist
Discoverer and Legal Owner of Telfer, Nifty & Kintyre Mines
The Great Sandy Desert of Australia

Founder of the True Geology

~~Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~



"Michael Mcneil" a écrit dans le message de
news: ...
"John Krempasky" wrote in message


It's missing one frame from one Geostationary satellite at that time; the
image is produced as a composite of the images from all the various
geostationary weather satellites.

Quite right. Any comment about the other thing? Or do you suppose they
are a standard featuture for the time of the year?

I got this back from the site owners:

We have a few global Molleweide images at
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/ otherwise, we don't have the
resources to archive the Web site products. Note that the images are not
meant for serious research: http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/cmoll.html and
are provided freely to the general public for education and general
knowledge. They should NOT be used to prove anything.

Which is why I asked for alternative sites after all.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"Wally Anglesea™" wrote in
message news
I suggest you get a good book or two on the topic.

He should start with "The young boys big picture book of clouds" It's
about his level.

You think I am pretty tall, then?

As it happens, there has never been a need for anyone to learn the finer
points of modern meteorology to be able to forecast easy things like
earthquakes.

What skywise meant by his post isn't worth delving into.

It was pretty obvious that the cloud was well below the level of
the other stuff. Whatever meteorological conditions cause them, I was
pointing out its presence.

What meteorological knowledge would be required to know that after the
Chile one, there would be a reciprocation elsewhere?

Anyone with half a brain (with most of the cells working though, so that
excludes you.)

As for the rest of it. I will tell you when the cluster is over. Till
then, keep your trap shut. Or grow even bigger feet to save your-self
falling into it.


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG