![]() |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
Check out the website at www.warrensweatherwatch.org.uk for a few photos
near Exeter of the nights lightning. |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
"Warren Radmore" wrote in message ... Check out the website at www.warrensweatherwatch.org.uk for a few photos near Exeter of the nights lightning. Nice. I was hoping to try some more photos too, but the lightning avoided me like the plague :( |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
"JamesB" wrote in message ... "Warren Radmore" wrote in message ... Check out the website at www.warrensweatherwatch.org.uk for a few photos near Exeter of the nights lightning. Nice. I was hoping to try some more photos too, but the lightning avoided me like the plague :( Been trying this evening to photograph the storm over north London ... without any success. Maybe its the shutter delay on my digital camera? Is film the only way to do it? Geoff |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:44:23 GMT, GBH wrote:
Been trying this evening to photograph the storm over north London ... without any success. Maybe its the shutter delay on my digital camera? If you are waiting with your finger on the button the lighting is over before you've even started to press it let alone have the camera think about it as well. Is film the only way to do it? I don't think so you need a camera that has a B shutter setting or long 30 to 60s exposure times and a means of stopping the lens right down. Set the camera up on a tripod or other firm mount. Stop the lens right down and open the shutter, keep it open for a minute or so then close it and move to the next frame, repeat until youi have a flash with the shutter open. Close the shutter straight away and RIYFB. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message ll.com... On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:44:23 GMT, GBH wrote: Been trying this evening to photograph the storm over north London ... without any success. Maybe its the shutter delay on my digital camera? If you are waiting with your finger on the button the lighting is over before you've even started to press it let alone have the camera think about it as well. Is film the only way to do it? I don't think so you need a camera that has a B shutter setting or long 30 to 60s exposure times and a means of stopping the lens right down. Set the camera up on a tripod or other firm mount. Stop the lens right down and open the shutter, keep it open for a minute or so then close it and move to the next frame, repeat until youi have a flash with the shutter open. Close the shutter straight away and RIYFB. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail Dave - thanks for that. In retrospect I realise where I was going wrong too, despite pre-loading the shutter release. Unfortunately my camera (Panasonic DMCFZ20) doesn't have a 'B' setting. Shame in a way because the CC was almost continuous.... Geoff |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:58:59 GMT, GBH wrote:
Unfortunately my camera (Panasonic DMCFZ20) doesn't have a 'B' setting. What is the longest exposure it will do? Though if you can't stop the lens down it might not be any use but worth a play to see what images you get so you know the settings for next time. Shame in a way because the CC was almost continuous.... I was hoping that the storms might make it this far north in the early hours but nope. It's just grey, overcast and occasional light drizzle. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message ll.com... On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 07:58:59 GMT, GBH wrote: Unfortunately my camera (Panasonic DMCFZ20) doesn't have a 'B' setting. What is the longest exposure it will do? Though if you can't stop the lens down it might not be any use but worth a play to see what images you get so you know the settings for next time. Shame in a way because the CC was almost continuous.... I was hoping that the storms might make it this far north in the early hours but nope. It's just grey, overcast and occasional light drizzle. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail Maximum exposure is 8 seconds available from 2.8 upto f8. So maybe in just repeating 8 second exposures I may get lucky ... After a gloomy start its reasonably sunny and warm here in Chigwell.... Geoff |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:09:15 GMT, GBH wrote:
Maximum exposure is 8 seconds available from 2.8 upto f8. So maybe in just repeating 8 second exposures I may get lucky ... You may well do. How long does the camera take to cycle from shutter close to being ready to open again? Is it quicker if you abort an known duff frame? Sods Law will apply such that either lightening will only happen when the camera is recycling or if you do capture one the storeage will be full. After a gloomy start its reasonably sunny and warm here in Chigwell.... A bit brighter here but still 8/8ths, cool 13.5C (mid 20's yesteday) and dizzly. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
You may well do. How long does the camera take to cycle from shutter
close to being ready to open again? Is it quicker if you abort an known duff frame? Sods Law will apply such that either lightening will only happen when the camera is recycling or if you do capture one the storeage will be full. After a gloomy start its reasonably sunny and warm here in Chigwell.... A bit brighter here but still 8/8ths, cool 13.5C (mid 20's yesteday) and dizzly. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail It takes 7 seconds from shutter close to shutter ready again. Once the shutter release is pressed it runs down the 8 seconds and cannot be aborted. Like you say, sods law is bound to come into play ... I'll try this out the next time we get any sferics worth shooting. Its probably asking too much of the camera.... 8/8ths with drizzle started in the last hour and 24C Geoff |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:25:23 GMT, GBH wrote:
It takes 7 seconds from shutter close to shutter ready again. Once the shutter release is pressed it runs down the 8 seconds and cannot be aborted. Can you abort the 7 second recycle so you can have the shutter open for longer than 50% of the time. I'll try this out the next time we get any sferics worth shooting. I'd have a play before hand so you know how to set the camera up and the best settings for the iris so you don't get seriously over exposed frames. Note lighting photgraphs only really work when light levels are really low like dusk and at night. Its probably asking too much of the camera.... But worth a try, getting just one decent shot of a lighting bolt is very rewarding. -- Cheers Dave. pam is missing e-mail |
Photos of lightning from the 24/6 storms
"Dave Liquorice" wrote in message ll.com... On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 14:25:23 GMT, GBH wrote: It takes 7 seconds from shutter close to shutter ready again. Once the shutter release is pressed it runs down the 8 seconds and cannot be aborted. Can you abort the 7 second recycle so you can have the shutter open for longer than 50% of the time. I'll try this out the next time we get any sferics worth shooting. I'd have a play before hand so you know how to set the camera up and the best settings for the iris so you don't get seriously over exposed frames. Note lighting photgraphs only really work when light levels are really low like dusk and at night. Its probably asking too much of the camera.... But worth a try, getting just one decent shot of a lighting bolt is very rewarding. Dave I have been experimenting most of the afternoon ... setting an 8 second exposure at f8 seems the best compromise between exposure time and exposure level - so agree with your comment about dusk and night shots being the best time. I can reduce the recycle time by reducing image quality and/or size - taking it down to 640/480 gives a 5 second recycle. I cannot abort the cycle once the shutter release has been pressed, so the timings are .. shutter open ... 8 seconds ... shutter closes ... frame is copied to SD 8 seconds.....camera ready. So thats an 8 second exposure every 16 seconds. So now I just need to wait for the next storm. Unfortunately all the current action seems to be well north of Chigwell at the moment. Dave I appreciate your time/comments in all this faffing around, much appreciated! Geoff |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 WeatherBanter.co.uk