Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
ne.weather.moderated (US North East Weather) (ne.weather.moderated). A moderated forum for the discussion of US North-East related weather. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
About what percent of doppler indicated tornadoes are ever verified as having
been twisters which reached the ground? -- This article was auto-posted by the ne.weather.moderated Weatherbot program. The author is solely responsible for its content. ne.weather.moderated FAQ/Charter: http://www.panix.com/~newm/faq.txt ne.weather.moderated moderators e-mail: (Please put "wx" or "weather" in the subject line to avoid the spam block.) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is an excerpt from the following URL:
http://webserv.chatsystems.com/~dosw...ado_essay.html "On the other hand, only about 25% of tornado warnings actually experience a tornado somewhere within the warned area. That is, the false alarm ratio [FAR] is about 75% [These numbers vary somewhat from year to year and from place to place]. If you hear a tornado warning, then the area within the NWS warning will actually experience a tornado about 1 time out of 4. That is roughly 250 times the likelihood when the climatology is as high as 1 in 1000! In most places around the country, being in a tornado warning makes you around 1000 times more likely than your local climatological frequency. Sure, the warnings aren't perfect and everyone wants to lower the false alarm rate. Unfortunately, if we lower the FAR, we also will surely lower the odds that a warning will be issued when a tornado does occur (the POD). As it now stands, individual forecasters who don't have a warning out when a disastrous tornado hits are in a lot more personal trouble than forecasters who issue false alarms. The NWS as a whole gets blamed for the FAR problem, not individual forecasters. Just how would you react if you were a forecaster under these circumstances? It seems obvious to most individual forecasters that you'd best "cover your a**" with a warning if there is even a low probability of a tornado. Disaster survey teams don't investigate false alarms, looking for someone to blame; they only go out after disastrous events. Given the politics, I certainly can't fault forecasters for their choices." As with most scientific matters, this can get quite complicated. Regards, Declan "COACHSTING" wrote in message ... About what percent of doppler indicated tornadoes are ever verified as having been twisters which reached the ground? -- This article was auto-posted by the ne.weather.moderated Weatherbot program. The author is solely responsible for its content. ne.weather.moderated FAQ/Charter: http://www.panix.com/~newm/faq.txt ne.weather.moderated moderators e-mail: (Please put "wx" or "weather" in the subject line to avoid the spam block.) -- This article was auto-posted by the ne.weather.moderated Weatherbot program. The author is solely responsible for its content. ne.weather.moderated FAQ/Charter: http://www.panix.com/~newm/faq.txt ne.weather.moderated moderators e-mail: (Please put "wx" or "weather" in the subject line to avoid the spam block.) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DOPPLER/NEXRAD? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Doppler Radar | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Doppler Dave's Ebay Brand Name Clothing | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Local Doppler | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
Desk Top Doppler | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) |