that the Man-Made Global Warming believers can never explain why it's
true in less than 100 lines?

Not to mention Man-Made Global Warming is nothing more than a 'theory'

Gravity on the other hand is a LAW.
Who doubts Gravity? No one.
Who doubts Man-Made Global Warming? About 600 scientists worldwide.

The 'theory' said by all the Man-Made Global Warming believers is that
those scientists must all be working for or being paid off by big bad
oil companies.

You people are very silly.

Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

that the Man-Made Global Warming believers can never explain why it's
true in less than 100 lines?

Not to mention Man-Made Global Warming is nothing more than a 'theory'

Gravity on the other hand is a LAW.
Who doubts Gravity? No one.
Who doubts Man-Made Global Warming? About 600 scientists worldwide.

The 'theory' said by all the Man-Made Global Warming believers is that
those scientists must all be working for or being paid off by big bad
oil companies.

You people are very silly.



Explain, in detail, from first principles, how gravity works.

Thanks.

--
Bill Asher

On 4 Nov 2007 16:48:07 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

that the Man-Made Global Warming believers can never explain why it's
true in less than 100 lines?

Not to mention Man-Made Global Warming is nothing more than a 'theory'

Gravity on the other hand is a LAW.
Who doubts Gravity? No one.
Who doubts Man-Made Global Warming? About 600 scientists worldwide.

The 'theory' said by all the Man-Made Global Warming believers is that
those scientists must all be working for or being paid off by big bad
oil companies.

You people are very silly.



Explain, in detail, from first principles, how gravity works.

That is stupid. Gravity is a LAW and works very well.

Man-Made Global Warming is a theory at best and shouldn't require
explanations IF it's even true.

Again, weather IS NOT THE SAME AS climate.

A Global Temp increase could be because of readings from North America
or even Europe. It does not blame MAN's action at all.


COULD YOU explain how my car is a factor in blizzards in Germany or
Flood in Mexico?

If all of it is iron clad than a simple paragraph should explain it.

Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

On 4 Nov 2007 16:48:07 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Crackles McFarly wrote in
g:

that the Man-Made Global Warming believers can never explain why
it's true in less than 100 lines?

Not to mention Man-Made Global Warming is nothing more than a
'theory'

Gravity on the other hand is a LAW.
Who doubts Gravity? No one.
Who doubts Man-Made Global Warming? About 600 scientists worldwide.

The 'theory' said by all the Man-Made Global Warming believers is
that those scientists must all be working for or being paid off by
big bad oil companies.

You people are very silly.



Explain, in detail, from first principles, how gravity works.

That is stupid. Gravity is a LAW and works very well.

If you don't want to play the game, don't stand on a pticher's mound
with a stupid grin on your face, rubbing a baseball against your crotch.

Physical laws should have simple explanations. Explain how gravity
works in less than 100 lines.

--
Bill Asher

On 4 Nov 2007 17:34:35 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

On 4 Nov 2007 16:48:07 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

that the Man-Made Global Warming believers can never explain why
it's true in less than 100 lines?

Not to mention Man-Made Global Warming is nothing more than a
'theory'

Gravity on the other hand is a LAW.
Who doubts Gravity? No one.
Who doubts Man-Made Global Warming? About 600 scientists worldwide.

The 'theory' said by all the Man-Made Global Warming believers is
that those scientists must all be working for or being paid off by
big bad oil companies.

You people are very silly.



Explain, in detail, from first principles, how gravity works.

That is stupid. Gravity is a LAW and works very well.

If you don't want to play the game, don't stand on a pticher's mound
with a stupid grin on your face, rubbing a baseball against your crotch.

Physical laws should have simple explanations. Explain how gravity
works in less than 100 lines.

What you're doing is avoiding a subject that you know cannot be
proven.

"Man's Actions" causing a GLOBAL rise in temps is so stupid I can't
see defending it.

What about the scientists who disagree? I guess they all work for big
bad nazi oil companies? All 600 of them, right?

Crackles McFarly wrote in
:

On 4 Nov 2007 17:34:35 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Crackles McFarly wrote in
g:

On 4 Nov 2007 16:48:07 GMT, William Asher sayd
the following:

Crackles McFarly wrote in
g:

that the Man-Made Global Warming believers can never explain why
it's true in less than 100 lines?

Not to mention Man-Made Global Warming is nothing more than a
'theory'

Gravity on the other hand is a LAW.
Who doubts Gravity? No one.
Who doubts Man-Made Global Warming? About 600 scientists
worldwide.

The 'theory' said by all the Man-Made Global Warming believers is
that those scientists must all be working for or being paid off by
big bad oil companies.

You people are very silly.



Explain, in detail, from first principles, how gravity works.

That is stupid. Gravity is a LAW and works very well.

If you don't want to play the game, don't stand on a pticher's mound
with a stupid grin on your face, rubbing a baseball against your
crotch.

Physical laws should have simple explanations. Explain how gravity
works in less than 100 lines.

What you're doing is avoiding a subject that you know cannot be
proven.

"Man's Actions" causing a GLOBAL rise in temps is so stupid I can't
see defending it.

What about the scientists who disagree? I guess they all work for big
bad nazi oil companies? All 600 of them, right?
^-Godwin's Law

The point is that if you can't explain something as simple as gravity,
which everyone believes in, why should I believe you understand
something as complex as climate physics, which over 600 scientists, many
of them with actual training in something vaguely related to climate
physics (e.g., physical chemistry, molecular biology, explosives
engineering), don't believe in? This points out to me you are simply
not qualified to make any assessments whatsoever about complicated
technical issues since you can't even understand basic simple things.
Besides, aren't you just here to provide comic relief? I seem to recall
you saying something like that once. Maybe it was foo-foo. I get all
you guys confused, you all sound the same.

Why is it though, that none of you skeptics can understand that you can
*never* prove a theory. It is a logical impossibility. Theories can
only be disproven. Instead of requiring people to prove a theory, which
can't be done and asking someone to do it makes the asker look ignorant
of philosophy and science, it is much more powerful to provide evidence
disproving a theory. It takes you from being a passive voice in the
discussion, to having an active voice. Admittedly, this is very hard to
do with respect to climate change (and frankly I don't think any of you
are up to the task), so instead we get assinine requests to prove
theories. Again, this shows why you skeptics are getting an ass****ing
of biblical proportions (to quote Neal Stephenson) in terms of the
scientific debate. You need to start bringing some credible objections
raised by people who don't have internet kook websites discussing why
quantum mechanics is wrong.

Anyway, Godwin's Law, thread's over.

--
Bill Asher

On 4 Nov 2007 21:50:31 GMT, William Asher sayd the
following:

Anyway, Godwin's Law, thread's over.

Yeah it is too bad your IQ isn't high enough to answer simple
questions.

Good Luck.

William Asher wrote:

SNIP

You people are very silly.

Explain, in detail, from first principles, how gravity works.


How gravity works:

1. You are fat. When I trip you, you hit the ground harder
2. I'm skinny. When you trip me, I don't hit the ground as hard as
you did.
3: I think I'll keep tripping you. It's fun to watch your fat hit the
ground!



Now, that explanation of gravity is just as stupid as the Global Warming
nonsense.

Twenty five years ago, the doom and gloomers were warning us to prepare
for the next ice age. Don't belive me, do a search for the New York
Times. I believe March of 1976.
They went on and on about the loss of crops due to extreme cold lasting
into June. Not enough fuel to heat our homes in the extreme frigid cold
about to hit the US. And on and on.............

On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:17:54 -0700, Elephant sayd the
following:

Now, that explanation of gravity is just as stupid as the Global Warming
nonsense.

NOT just as stupid but rather MORE, much more, stupid than someone
explaining global warming.

99% of the keyboard heros on the NET think they understand global
warming, and 100% blame it on man's action.

It's too bad we WILL see a carbon tax on individual incomes within 5
years.. You all asked for this..

Elephant wrote in :

Twenty five years ago, the doom and gloomers were warning us to
prepare for the next ice age. Don't belive me, do a search for the
New York Times. I believe March of 1976.
They went on and on about the loss of crops due to extreme cold
lasting into June. Not enough fuel to heat our homes in the extreme
frigid cold about to hit the US. And on and on.............

Dear Ectomorph:

Do a search for peer-reviewed publications in mainstream technical
journals from that era that predicted there would be an ice age. You
won't find them. You won't believe me, but alas, you are also incapable
of even beginning to understand how such a literature search might be
conducted (or you would have done it already and discovered that writing
the thing you did above makes you look at best semi-retarded).
Therefore, I predict you will be limited to responding with more
insults, and maybe if I am lucky a link or two to some wack website with
a mangled citation that when examined closely will not back your point.
Such is the lot of you all on the lunatic fringe.

I suggest you stockpile guns, food, and medicine. Thinking those things
will protect you from all the bogeymen in the world might ease the
gnawing fear inside you.

--
Bill Asher

p.s. Loved the explanation of gravity. It fits with the semi-retarded
assessment of mine above. Do you also have a webpage where you have a
personal theory of how some major theory in physics is wrong? Maybe
you're an "an inertial drive *is* possible" kind of a guy? Whatever,
send me the link. Thanks.