The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

On Apr 11, 7:39*pm, Roger Coppock wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.http://www..remss.com/data/msu/month...onthly_MSU_AMS...
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Why would one need a 500 million billion dollar satellite, to know the
temperature of the Earth, at or near the surface of the Earth?
Wouldn't a 99 cent thermometer do the trick?

More billion dollar lies............................that's why

Chow

In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005
@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4 The global data
are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed he http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)

On Apr 12, 1:39*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.http://www..remss.com/data/msu/month...onthly_MSU_AMS...
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Roger, its not 'continued warming'. Warming stopped. Sticking a red
line on a scatter plot does not mean its still warming.

Its clear fro the graph that its currently as warm as 1980. How is
that continued?

In article f260d98c-6a18-4ef7-93f5-79ff0dd54535@
27g2000yqv.googlegroups.com, matt_sykes wrote...

On Apr 12, 1:39*am, Roger Coppock wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that
the air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please
see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the
University of Alabama at
Huntsville.http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed
hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows
a temperature rise above the surface of the land and
sea.http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...S_Monthly_MSU_
AMS... The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed
hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Roger, its not 'continued warming'. Warming stopped. Sticking a red line
on a scatter plot does not mean its still warming.

Its clear from the graph that its currently as warm as 1980. How is that
continued?

http://i55.tinypic.com/ffbgvb.png

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)

On Apr 12, 8:18*am, Falcon wrote:
In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005





@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m...tglhmam_5.4The global data
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So spinner says it doesn't...............but the trend shows it
clearly does.

I think spinner has just defined climate denial.

I also love the way that, just *one day* later, spinner uses exactly
the same phrase that was used by someone he both detests and is trying
to hide from, to decry climate science. The phrase, to my knowledge
has not been used for 12 months on here.

Killfile; *my arse*. laughing out loud as he heads out into the
sunshine

On Apr 12, 4:17*am, Dawlish wrote:
On Apr 12, 8:18*am, Falcon wrote:





In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005

@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m...m_5.4Theglobal data
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So spinner says it doesn't...............but the trend shows it
clearly does.

I think spinner has just defined climate denial.

I also love the way that, just *one day* later, spinner uses exactly
the same phrase that was used by someone he both detests and is trying
to hide from, to decry climate science. The phrase, to my knowledge
has not been used for 12 months on here.

Killfile; *my arse*. laughing out loud as he heads out into the
sunshine- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dawlish, how is your acne situation.?

On Apr 12, 11:21*am, GABRIELLE-GIFFORDS-FOR-PRESIDENT
wrote:
On Apr 12, 4:17*am, Dawlish wrote:





On Apr 12, 8:18*am, Falcon wrote:

In article eafbc20f-f0d3-4f01-8b30-8cb604fb7005

@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, Roger Coppock wrote...

The satellite record, in all its current interpretations, shows that the
air near the surface is warming. For background on the satellite
temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records from the University
of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m...4Theglobaldata
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also shows a
temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...hly_MSU_AMSU_C
hannel_TLT_Anomalies_Land_and_Ocean_v03_3.txt The data from 82.5N to 70S
are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Absolutely hilarious. If ever a headline was designed to fuel public
scepticism about climate hysteria, it's that one. "MSU Data show continued
warming", my arse.

--
Falcon:
fide, sed cui vide. (L)- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So spinner says it doesn't...............but the trend shows it
clearly does.

I think spinner has just defined climate denial.

I also love the way that, just *one day* later, spinner uses exactly
the same phrase that was used by someone he both detests and is trying
to hide from, to decry climate science. The phrase, to my knowledge
has not been used for 12 months on here.

Killfile; *my arse*. laughing out loud as he heads out into the
sunshine- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Dawlish, how is your acne situation.?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

O love stalkers. Especially the really foul name-changing racist ones.
When a stalker starts; you know you've got to him properly. This one
is a racist and a creationist and thinks he can comment on science.
he's never criticised by his own - the climate deniers - which says an
awful lot about them, en mass.

Just call him what he is and apart from doinmg that; ignore every
single post he ever makes.................

On 04/12/2011 01:39 AM, Roger Coppock wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.
http://www.remss.com/data/msu/monthl...cean_v03_3.txt
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed he
http://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

The trend is very much dependent on the latitude. If you look at the
figures for the various latitude bands, the positive trend is most
dramatic for 60/82, and nearly as strong for -20/20, whereas the trend
for -70/70 is almost zero - which seems to indicate that temperate
latitudes are not warming??

On 04/12/2011 09:45 AM, matt_sykes wrote:
On Apr 12, 1:39 am, Roger wrote:
The satellite record, in all its current interpretations,
shows that the air near the surface is warming.
For background on the satellite temperature proxy please see:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satelli...e_measurements

The URL below is one of the more conservative records
from the University of Alabama at Huntsville.http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/public/m.../tltglhmam_5.4
The global data are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/UAH-MSU.jpg

The Remote Sensing Systems Lower Troposphere (TLT) analysis also
shows a temperature rise above the surface of the land and sea.http://www..remss.com/data/msu/month...onthly_MSU_AMS...
The data from 82.5N to 70S are graphed hehttp://members.cox.net/rcoppock/RSS-MSU.jpg

Roger, its not 'continued warming'. Warming stopped. Sticking a red
line on a scatter plot does not mean its still warming.

Its clear fro the graph that its currently as warm as 1980. How is
that continued?


If you pick and choose the numbers, you can get anything you like.
Obviously you prefer your version.