 |
|
| uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
| Reply |
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 18th 06, 12:11 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
Stole this from a post on two
..
Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." .. Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ?  |
|
#2
January 18th 06, 01:43 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just
pleased to see it? Dave "nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? |
|
#3
January 18th 06, 02:45 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
"Dave.C" wrote in message ... Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just pleased to see it? Dave "nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... |
|
#4
January 18th 06, 04:03 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
"JamesB" james. wrote in message ... "Dave.C" wrote in message ... Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just pleased to see it? Dave "nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... I'm cold |
|
#5
January 18th 06, 04:13 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
"Dave.C" wrote in message ... Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just pleased to see it? Dave "nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? I didnt Chuckle that was the copied post That guy would chuckle looking down his own pants! |
|
#6
January 18th 06, 04:40 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
JamesB wrote: "Dave.C" wrote in message ... Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just pleased to see it? Dave "nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... In days of yore, when the Met Office computers were ECL or TTL rather than high speed CMOS, forecast expressions such as cold, rather cold, very cold, mild, exceptionally mild, warm etc were very strictly defined in terms of the deviation from the seasonal average. This order was held in the pages of the venerable "Met Office Manual for Forecasts to the General Public" version 7(i)a (or some-such) and woe betide any maverick forecaster showing any individuality, using words or expressions such as "showers pecking at the coast". Martin |
|
#7
January 18th 06, 04:57 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
In message .com, JPG
writes JamesB wrote: "Dave.C" wrote in message ... Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just pleased to see it? Dave "nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Depends on your definition of "rather cold" really... In days of yore, when the Met Office computers were ECL or TTL rather than high speed CMOS, forecast expressions such as cold, rather cold, very cold, mild, exceptionally mild, warm etc were very strictly defined in terms of the deviation from the seasonal average. This order was held in the pages of the venerable "Met Office Manual for Forecasts to the General Public" version 7(i)a (or some-such) and woe betide any maverick forecaster showing any individuality, using words or expressions such as "showers pecking at the coast". Martin The strict definitions are still on the Met Office website, though I can't remember exactly where. Norman (delete "thisbit" twice to e-mail) -- Norman Lynagh Weather Consultancy Chalfont St Giles 85m a.s.l. England |
|
#8
January 18th 06, 05:29 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
"nguk" wrote in message ... "Dave.C" wrote in message ... Why the chuckle, Neil? Isn't that feasible at this stage - or were you just pleased to see it? Dave "nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? I didnt Chuckle that was the copied post That guy would chuckle looking down his own pants! LOL you are rude sometimes Neil :-) Will. -- |
|
#9
January 18th 06, 05:31 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
"nguk" wrote in message ... . Had a chuckle this morning reading the met office 10-day outlook for South-East England: "Becoming rather cold with a risk of very cold conditions developing." . Anyone got a link for this met office 10day ? http://www.metoffice.com/weather/eur...ook/index.html Will. -- |
|
#10
January 18th 06, 05:33 PM
posted to uk.sci.weather
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stole this from a post on two
"Norman Lynagh" wrote in message ... In message .com, JPG writes JamesB wrote: In days of yore, when the Met Office computers were ECL or TTL rather than high speed CMOS, forecast expressions such as cold, rather cold, very cold, mild, exceptionally mild, warm etc were very strictly defined in terms of the deviation from the seasonal average. This order was held in the pages of the venerable "Met Office Manual for Forecasts to the General Public" version 7(i)a (or some-such) and woe betide any maverick forecaster showing any individuality, using words or expressions such as "showers pecking at the coast". Martin The strict definitions are still on the Met Office website, though I can't remember exactly where. http://www.metoffice.com/weather/europe/uk/guide.html Will. -- |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Day ?j?*10^3 - The Sun is Quiescent - Two satellites collide, Two nukes collide | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| CO2 escape route from underground storage found. [two morons who lack reading comprehension post] | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| Who stole my front? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
| A hurricane stole my toupet ! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
| New Yorkers Stole Our Weather | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
Linear Mode
