Taken from www.thefreedomforum.com:


NASA measurements from space demonstrate that Earth absorbs more Solar
heat than it is able to radiate back to space. Solar energy output is
scheduled to increase until 2012. Platentary pollution grows daily, so
that this excess of heat increases daily too. Heat generated in the
planetary interior is truly trapped and the planetary interior
overheats. Global catastrophe is inevitable and it is OUR fault -
polluting the atmosphere to the point of no return.

Since the excentricity of the solid planetary core increases as the
planetary interior overheats, major seismic/tectonic catastrophes are
most likely to be initiated around the time of so-called "king tides"
like the one on 28 February 2006 for example. [Tom]

-----
Tom, can you please expand on your statement that `solar energy output
is scheduled to increase until 2012`, please? [Samuel].

Sun's energy emissions follow cycles that last approximately 11 years.
Year 2012 is likely to be the year of the next Solar maximum. [Tom]

-----
dear Tom, if the earth core is ecentric and changes as a result of
gravity of sun and moon,then the magnetic field of earth and its
indensity should be changed perodic ,specially at `king tides`. are
there any measurements of this phenomena? can we determine ecentricity
of the core by magnetic field changes? [davood].

Eccentric core has quite small contribution to tides and is moderated
by the core inertia. Some scientists are aware of the small "unknown"
component of tides. Due to overheating of the planetary interior this
component should grow.

Planetary magnetic field is a result of many effects. For example we
live in times when the planetary magnetic field weakens due to changes
in the core composition and it is about to change its polarity. When
the magnetic field is weak, it becomes difficult to separate various
effects from disturbances such as solar wind effects. I am not aware of
anyone trying to include core effects in explanation of observable
changes in planetary magnetic field. [Tom]

-----
Hi Tom,I dont feel that we will have time till 2012. Almost everyday
there is atleast one earthquake measuring more than 4. Yesterday BBC
shown a new report on ice cap melting at Greenland. I was really stunt
seeing it physically melting!! I really dont understand the logic
behind US govt. 2 days back one of the scientist in NASA revealed that
he has been restricted by the govt not to disclose the seriousness
about the studies about global warming and greenhouse gases impact. Why
they do this..? My question is why the govt wanted to hide these info
from people..? What is their benefit since the problem is for everyone
including them..? [bpt].

-----
Disasters are likely to grow in severity from now until 2012.

As they do, most people on Earth will die well before 2012, just like
victims of tsunami and other recent earthquakes. When volcanoes begin
to erupt and explode, most people on Earth are likely to die from
poisonous gasses, just like dinosaurs did a long time ago...

When Antarctic and Greenland glaciers begin to slide down to oceans
(not necessarily molten) - we will experience global tsunamis, followed
by a permanent rise in the sea level. If all Antarctic and Greenland
ice finds its way down to oceans, the sea level will be 80m higher than
it is today...

The info about 'US govt gagging NASA scientist' is here, until someone
removes it. [Tom]

Sandra Jones wrote:

snippage

I really dont understand the logic
behind US govt. 2 days back one of the scientist in NASA revealed that
he has been restricted by the govt not to disclose the seriousness
about the studies about global warming and greenhouse gases impact. Why
they do this..? My question is why the govt wanted to hide these info
from people..? What is their benefit since the problem is for everyone
including them..?

The logic is quite simple and is as follows:

1) They consider that the battle to prevent global warming has already
been lost, so fighting it is futile.
2) Informing the people that they have a starring role in an extinction
event is considered by that government to be unwise.
3) The benefit is clear - no unrest or panic among the population as it
quietly meets its demise.

snippage


Gianna

Sandra Jones wrote:
Taken from www.thefreedomforum.com:


You should have left it there.

Tudor Hughes.

Global catastrophe is inevitable and it is OUR fault -
polluting the atmosphere to the point of no return.




Yawn!!!!!

zzzzzzzzzz

"nguk" wrote in message
...
Global catastrophe is inevitable and it is OUR fault -
polluting the atmosphere to the point of no return.




Yawn!!!!!

zzzzzzzzzz



Never heard such a whole load of ******** in my life.

Yawn indeed Neil.

Will.
--

On 2006-01-31, Will Hand wrote:

"nguk" wrote in message
...
Global catastrophe is inevitable and it is OUR fault -
polluting the atmosphere to the point of no return.




Yawn!!!!!

zzzzzzzzzz



Never heard such a whole load of ******** in my life.

Yawn indeed Neil.

Will.
--



Bogus message alert!

--
Jon
____________________________________________
jondotrogersatntlworlddotcom
============================================