In message , Lawrence
writes
Okay Gianna you can fall chains of silver and fall for chains of gold , you
can fall for pretty strangers and the promises they hold.
As for me


And I'm neither left or right
I'm just staying home tonight,
getting lost in that hopeless little screen.
But I'm stubborn as those garbage bags
that Time cannot decay,
I'm junk but I'm still holding up
this little wild bouquet:
Democracy is coming to the U.S.A.


That's for that **** Bill. But who are the lyrics by ?



Larry fash; I rattled your cage after all.

Tell me though, just between us it won't go any further honest. Do you
have a life beyond the PC and the Daily Mail? Surely you must have at
least one mate....well maybe not.

Hang on what about that other sad case Gavin? I bet you two will have
something in common, I bet you'd be the only other one who'd think
there's a point to his web site. Have a look, bet you like
it......someone must do.... or else it really would be the waste of
space it currently appears to be.

www.gavinstaples.com


HTH


Cheers
--
Bill

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:55:41 +0000, Bill wrote:


Hang on what about that other sad case Gavin? I bet you two will have
something in common, I bet you'd be the only other one who'd think
there's a point to his web site. Have a look, bet you like
it......someone must do.... or else it really would be the waste of
space it currently appears to be.

Is there any particular reason why you have to be so insulting and so
inconsiderate towards other people? We all form opinions about other
people but you just cannot make this type of personal comment 'public'
: how you can live with yourself after having done so.....

You know Robin when I saw your's and Bill's posts I'd assumed the subject
matter was about being OT and rattling on about Hi-Fi and was going to
apologise. So in a way I was quite releived.

As for Bill I suppose he does have a point, I mean what sort of person
spends hour analysing individual post and then forms an opinion about them,
hasn't he got better things to do? I suppose some of us try and say
something whether it's interesting or not. I've personally got into the
habit of trying to be flippant and vaguely funny, Bill on the otherhand can
only define himself by being insulting. That's all very fine but Bill that's
all it is, nasty, there is no humour, no redeeming features and just serves
to leave a bad taste. You'd be banned on TWO!





"Robin Nicholson" wrote in
message ...
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:55:41 +0000, Bill wrote:


Hang on what about that other sad case Gavin? I bet you two will have
something in common, I bet you'd be the only other one who'd think
there's a point to his web site. Have a look, bet you like
it......someone must do.... or else it really would be the waste of
space it currently appears to be.

Is there any particular reason why you have to be so insulting and so
inconsiderate towards other people? We all form opinions about other
people but you just cannot make this type of personal comment 'public'
: how you can live with yourself after having done so.....

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:33:02 -0000, "Lawrence Jenkins"
wrote:


As for Bill I suppose he does have a point, I mean what sort of person
spends hour analysing individual post and then forms an opinion about them,
hasn't he got better things to do?

Even if ' Bill ' has 'a point' this is not the place to post hurtful
and unnecessary opinions in the way that he did. And, unfortunately,
saying that he has a point and then making the above statement, is
unpleasant. How do you personally know he spends' hours' analysing
each post? Are you there? Do you know his circumstances?

Would you, for instance, make such a statement if he was a once active
person now wheelchair bound with all the sadness that can bring
initially? Would you say this if he was battling with cancer and
needed something to distract his fear of death? Or if his only child
had been tragically killed?

No one on this forum needs anything other than thanks for
contributing, and if that contribution is deemed trite,unnecessary or
whatever by you then simply pass on to a posting that, in a science
forum, does allow you to reply or enquire about.

I don't understand plenty of postings from the more learned people but
I am going to learn, and not destroy people by actions that are
inappropriate.




I suppose some of us try and say
something whether it's interesting or not. I've personally got into the
habit of trying to be flippant and vaguely funny

If you say so. There are plenty of opportunities to have fun, but it
has to be in a considered way that shows a basic warmth towards other
people. It costs nothing and should make the donor feel proud of his
standards.
Robin

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 08:33:02 -0000, "Lawrence Jenkins"
wrote:


As for Bill I suppose he does have a point, I mean what sort of person
spends hour analysing individual post and then forms an opinion about them,
hasn't he got better things to do?

Nah Larry old fash, it doesn't take an hour to sum you and Gav up, half
a second is enough. Risible, that's you two, still it takes all sorts.
What I find most interesting is that the likes of you and Gav are
allowed to frequently make your throw away neo-con quips and nothing is
said. Yet whenever your crap gets challenged the whinging starts.


In message , Robin Nicholson
writes

Even if ' Bill ' has 'a point' this is not the place to post hurtful
and unnecessary opinions in the way that he did. And, unfortunately,
saying that he has a point and then making the above statement, is
unpleasant. How do you personally know he spends' hours' analysing
each post? Are you there? Do you know his circumstances?



Robin you are obviously a very decent man and I'm sorry that you find me
offensive. Sometimes however it's necessary to stamp on the low life.
--
Bill

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 02:43:55 +0000, Bill wrote:



Sometimes however it's necessary to stamp on the low life.

And inflict the rest of us?
Robin