On Oct 12, 12:33*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 11, 4:20*pm, Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 11, 1:55*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

A gathering of Lows now fills the NE North Atlantic. The weather in
Britain is exactly as it was at the start of the spell I stated at the
outside, it would be so like. A dull overcast that requires one puts a
light on at mid day if one wishes to make a major repair to an engine,
or whatever, on one's kitchen table.

Dull? Overcast?? Are you sure???

You do know what these little sun symbols on these tables mean, W,
don't you?

http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/...ons/index.html

I wonder if you could specify what neotype of androgen you conform to,
for me, please.

It's just that I have atypical homophobic attrition built into my
system and need to conform to whatever parameters I might be able to
reach for your edification.

No offence distended.

Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.
Yesterday was not "dull and overcast" weather for the vast majority of
the UK. Therefore what you forecast was palpably wrong. As have been
your earthquake forecasts. 1 out of 8, 12.5% since mid-April is not
doing you many favours. If I hadn't monitored it, you might be able to
convince someone that your highly eccentric ramblings had a basis in
sense, but your outcome accuracy percentage shows anyone reading that
your theories are highly unlikely to have merit.

Although you'd like to ignore that, it surely concerns you?

On Oct 12, 8:41*am, Dawlish wrote:

Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.

Now Dawlish my pet, I could never insult you. Take you to the vet's
perhaps and stop you humping lamp posts maybe but, ...insult you?

Impossible.

Have a biscuit, there's a good boy.

On Oct 12, 9:15*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:41*am, Dawlish wrote:



Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.

Now Dawlish my pet, I could never insult you. Take you to the vet's
perhaps and stop you humping lamp posts maybe but, ...insult you?

Impossible.

Have a biscuit, there's a good boy.

Any chance of answering the question about "dull and overcast"
yesterday, instead of continuing the abuse? You forecast "dull and
overcast" using your "spells" and it patently wasn't. Return to your
forecast and explain it. You are just prevaricating when your theory
doesn't work - as always.

Or continue to evade it and continue your abuse of the questioner?
(Which is far more probable)

In article
,
Dawlish wrote:

On Oct 12, 9:15*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:41*am, Dawlish wrote:



Abuse, as usual. I was questioning your understanding of "dull and
overcast" when applied to the UK and not just your own back garden.

Now Dawlish my pet, I could never insult you. Take you to the vet's
perhaps and stop you humping lamp posts maybe but, ...insult you?

Impossible.

Have a biscuit, there's a good boy.

Any chance of answering the question about "dull and overcast"
yesterday, instead of continuing the abuse? You forecast "dull and
overcast" using your "spells" and it patently wasn't. Return to your
forecast and explain it. You are just prevaricating when your theory
doesn't work - as always.

Or continue to evade it and continue your abuse of the questioner?
(Which is far more probable)

Its no use... he's lost in usenet self-dialogue.

Beware of his own reply's to his own posts... sometimes it leads to an
argument. LOL!!!

ROTFLMAO!


Coffee during 9/11