uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 5th 09, 09:19 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Default Sun Spot Activity

Without being tarred with the same brush as Piers Corbin, could this
current cooler winter have something to do with the lack of sun spot
activity?

Currently there are NO sunspots on our sun today (05/01/09), and 2008
was the least active year since 1900.

http://www.spaceweather.com/images20...osdrcbrl m7o7

http://www.smeter.net/propagation/su...spot-cycle.php

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/12/3...tends-cooling/

  #2   Report Post  
Old January 5th 09, 09:50 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2004
Posts: 14
Default Sun Spot Activity

wrote in message
...
Without being tarred with the same brush as Piers Corbin, could this
current cooler winter have something to do with the lack of sun spot
activity?

Currently there are NO sunspots on our sun today (05/01/09), and 2008
was the least active year since 1900.


Must be having some effect as the Sun had the least no of sunspots in 2008
for nearly 100 years. The next 12 months will be interesting to see if solar
cycle 24 really kicks off or not. Solar wind has also been lowest recorded
in the last 50 years - plus the Alaskian volcanoes last year..

John


  #4   Report Post  
Old January 5th 09, 11:11 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2004
Posts: 14
Default Sun Spot Activity

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Hall"
Newsgroups: uk.sci.weather
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 10:09 PM
Subject: Sun Spot Activity


I suppose it's possible. The peak of the Little Ice Age is supposed to
have pretty much coincided with a long period of very low sunspot levels
lasting from 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum.



There is certainly speculation that the Sun may be entering another Dalton
minimum - 1790 to 1830 - also a period of lower global temperatires -
certainly looks as if the normal sunspot cycle has been disrupted.

John


  #5   Report Post  
Old January 6th 09, 08:14 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2006
Posts: 2,129
Default Sun Spot Activity

On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 at 23:11:50, John Horobin
wrote in uk.sci.weather :

From: "John Hall"

I suppose it's possible. The peak of the Little Ice Age is supposed to
have pretty much coincided with a long period of very low sunspot levels
lasting from 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum.


There is certainly speculation that the Sun may be entering another Dalton
minimum - 1790 to 1830 - also a period of lower global temperatires -
certainly looks as if the normal sunspot cycle has been disrupted.

Can't wait to see the GW advocates squirm...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 6th 09, 10:49 AM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,314
Default Sun Spot Activity

In article ,
Paul Hyett writes:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 at 23:11:50, John Horobin
o.uk wrote in uk.sci.weather :

From: "John Hall"

I suppose it's possible. The peak of the Little Ice Age is supposed to
have pretty much coincided with a long period of very low sunspot levels
lasting from 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum.


There is certainly speculation that the Sun may be entering another Dalton
minimum - 1790 to 1830 - also a period of lower global temperatires -
certainly looks as if the normal sunspot cycle has been disrupted.

Can't wait to see the GW advocates squirm...


If reduced solar activity should happen to counteract the effects of AGW
over the next few decades, then it's possible that we will have been
very fortunate. But the putative solar downturn won't last for ever, so
should not be used as an excuse for inaction.
--
John Hall
"It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless
information."
Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 6th 09, 12:08 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,810
Default Sun Spot Activity

On 6 Jan, 08:14, Paul Hyett wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 at 23:11:50, John Horobin
wrote in uk.sci.weather :

From: "John Hall"


I suppose it's possible. The peak of the Little Ice Age is supposed to
have pretty much coincided with a long period of very low sunspot levels
lasting from 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum.


There is certainly speculation that the Sun may be entering another Dalton
minimum - 1790 to 1830 *- also a period of lower global temperatires -
certainly looks as if the normal sunspot cycle has been disrupted.


Can't wait to see the GW advocates squirm...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)


I would have thought, assuming there is a link between sun spot
activity and global cooling, that the fact that globally 2008 was
still significantly warmer than the mean for 1971-2000 despite very
low sun spot activity, is a strong argument in favour of AGW.

Graham
Penzance
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 6th 09, 12:52 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Default Sun Spot Activity

On 6 Jan, 12:08, Graham Easterling wrote:
On 6 Jan, 08:14, Paul Hyett wrote:





On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 at 23:11:50, John Horobin
wrote in uk.sci.weather :


From: "John Hall"


I suppose it's possible. The peak of the Little Ice Age is supposed to
have pretty much coincided with a long period of very low sunspot levels
lasting from 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum.


There is certainly speculation that the Sun may be entering another Dalton
minimum - 1790 to 1830 *- also a period of lower global temperatires -
certainly looks as if the normal sunspot cycle has been disrupted.


Can't wait to see the GW advocates squirm...
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)


I would have thought, assuming there is a link between sun spot
activity and global cooling, that the fact that globally 2008 was
still significantly warmer than the mean for 1971-2000 despite very
low sun spot activity, is a strong argument in favour of AGW.

Graham
Penzance- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


Graham,

On one of the websites I was looking at, it said there is about a 5yr
time lag between lower solar activity and lower global temperatures.

  #9   Report Post  
Old January 6th 09, 06:01 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: May 2006
Posts: 2,129
Default Sun Spot Activity

On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 at 10:49:35, John Hall
wrote in uk.sci.weather :

In article ,
Paul Hyett writes:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2009 at 23:11:50, John Horobin
o.uk wrote in uk.sci.weather :

From: "John Hall"

I suppose it's possible. The peak of the Little Ice Age is supposed to
have pretty much coincided with a long period of very low sunspot levels
lasting from 1645 to 1715 known as the Maunder Minimum.

There is certainly speculation that the Sun may be entering another Dalton
minimum - 1790 to 1830 - also a period of lower global temperatires -
certainly looks as if the normal sunspot cycle has been disrupted.

Can't wait to see the GW advocates squirm...


If reduced solar activity should happen to counteract the effects of AGW
over the next few decades, then it's possible that we will have been
very fortunate. But the putative solar downturn won't last for ever, so
should not be used as an excuse for inaction.


Well, what I know is - I've just recorded my lowest temperature for 22
years...

-10.9C last night!
--
Paul Hyett, Cheltenham (change 'invalid83261' to 'blueyonder' to email me)
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 6th 09, 06:53 PM posted to uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,314
Default Sun Spot Activity

In article ,
Paul Hyett writes:
Well, what I know is - I've just recorded my lowest temperature for 22
years...

-10.9C last night!


Congratulations. But hopefully you don't need me to tell you that one
very cold night, or even one very cold winter, does not disprove GW,
even though people like Christopher Booker seem to think that it does.
--
John Hall
"It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless
information."
Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sun spot cycle impacting global warming and cooling TKeating sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 1 June 24th 09 07:51 AM
Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity 13 May 2009Joint USAF/NOAA Report of Solar and Geophysical Activity 13 May 2009 [email protected] sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 May 14th 09 01:48 AM
Sun Spot activity Keith (Southend) uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 9 October 31st 03 12:01 PM
Sun Spot Plasma Physics Edwin L. Bondoc sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 6 October 26th 03 04:09 AM
Sun Spot Plasma Physics Gordon D. Pusch sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 4 October 26th 03 03:57 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017