Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
there seems to rumors that these are compiled from ouput that is 24hrs old?
UK Outlook for Monday 1 Feb 2010 to Wednesday 10 Feb 2010: Cold with overnight frost and ice throughout, but a good deal of dry and bright weather for many parts of the UK by day. However, wintry showers are likely for exposed northeastern parts throughout the period, with a risk of more persistent sleet or snow for some eastern areas at times on Monday. Rain, maybe hill snow, might reach the northwest on Tuesday. Wintry showers may spread further inland towards the end of the week as winds become more northeasterly. The mainly dry weather with frost, ice and possibly fog, is likely to continue for much of the rest of the period, with temperatures mostly below normal. However, wintry showers or more persistent snow could affect eastern and southern areas towards the end of the period. Updated: 1141 on Wed 27 Jan 2010 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
TT writes: there seems to rumors that these are compiled from ouput that is 24hrs old? They are released around noon, which suggests that they will be using output from the ECM and UKMO 00Z runs, which would become available sometime around 7am. For the GFS, the 06Z run doesn't complete until about 10:30, which suggests that there might be time for a quick look at that. Remember that they'll be looking at the ensembles as well as the operational runs. (Is there a UKMO ensemble, which we don't get to see, or just the operational run?) They may give less weight to the GFS than to the other two models, since the UKMO isn't a stakeholder in it. UK Outlook for Monday 1 Feb 2010 to Wednesday 10 Feb 2010: Cold with overnight frost and ice throughout, but a good deal of dry and bright weather for many parts of the UK by day. However, wintry showers are likely for exposed northeastern parts throughout the period, with a risk of more persistent sleet or snow for some eastern areas at times on Monday. Rain, maybe hill snow, might reach the northwest on Tuesday. Wintry showers may spread further inland towards the end of the week as winds become more northeasterly. The mainly dry weather with frost, ice and possibly fog, is likely to continue for much of the rest of the period, with temperatures mostly below normal. However, wintry showers or more persistent snow could affect eastern and southern areas towards the end of the period. Updated: 1141 on Wed 27 Jan 2010 That doesn't seem unreasonable to me, based on the 00Z/06Z runs (or even going by the subsequent 12Z runs come to that, which haven't greatly changed things). -- John Hall "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people from coughing." Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:33:05 +0000, TT wrote:
there seems to rumors that these are compiled from ouput that is 24hrs old? snip Somebody on TWO (username "snowhope") emailed them today about this very issue, and the response was clear: it's the 00z runs that are used. The full response is posted near the bottom of this page, in blue: http://theweatheroutlook.com/twocomm...x?PageIndex=17 -- Bewdley, Worcs. ~90m asl. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Hall" wrote in message ... In article , TT writes: there seems to rumors that these are compiled from ouput that is 24hrs old? They are released around noon, which suggests that they will be using output from the ECM and UKMO 00Z runs, which would become available sometime around 7am. For the GFS, the 06Z run doesn't complete until about 10:30, which suggests that there might be time for a quick look at that. Remember that they'll be looking at the ensembles as well as the operational runs. (Is there a UKMO ensemble, which we don't get to see, or just the operational run?) They may give less weight to the GFS than to the other two models, since the UKMO isn't a stakeholder in it. UK Outlook for Monday 1 Feb 2010 to Wednesday 10 Feb 2010: Cold with overnight frost and ice throughout, but a good deal of dry and bright weather for many parts of the UK by day. However, wintry showers are likely for exposed northeastern parts throughout the period, with a risk of more persistent sleet or snow for some eastern areas at times on Monday. Rain, maybe hill snow, might reach the northwest on Tuesday. Wintry showers may spread further inland towards the end of the week as winds become more northeasterly. The mainly dry weather with frost, ice and possibly fog, is likely to continue for much of the rest of the period, with temperatures mostly below normal. However, wintry showers or more persistent snow could affect eastern and southern areas towards the end of the period. Updated: 1141 on Wed 27 Jan 2010 That doesn't seem unreasonable to me, based on the 00Z/06Z runs (or even going by the subsequent 12Z runs come to that, which haven't greatly changed things). -- John Hall "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people from coughing." Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83) yes there is a UK ensemble we don't get to see, I believe they give slightly higher weighting to each of operational runs. They (the forecasters) I believe then look at anything which may have affected the model runs e.g. bad obs getting in. Jon or Will should be able to give more detail, or correct me. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stan Kellett" wrote in message ... "John Hall" wrote in message ... In article , TT writes: there seems to rumors that these are compiled from ouput that is 24hrs old? They are released around noon, which suggests that they will be using output from the ECM and UKMO 00Z runs, which would become available sometime around 7am. For the GFS, the 06Z run doesn't complete until about 10:30, which suggests that there might be time for a quick look at that. Remember that they'll be looking at the ensembles as well as the operational runs. (Is there a UKMO ensemble, which we don't get to see, or just the operational run?) They may give less weight to the GFS than to the other two models, since the UKMO isn't a stakeholder in it. UK Outlook for Monday 1 Feb 2010 to Wednesday 10 Feb 2010: Cold with overnight frost and ice throughout, but a good deal of dry and bright weather for many parts of the UK by day. However, wintry showers are likely for exposed northeastern parts throughout the period, with a risk of more persistent sleet or snow for some eastern areas at times on Monday. Rain, maybe hill snow, might reach the northwest on Tuesday. Wintry showers may spread further inland towards the end of the week as winds become more northeasterly. The mainly dry weather with frost, ice and possibly fog, is likely to continue for much of the rest of the period, with temperatures mostly below normal. However, wintry showers or more persistent snow could affect eastern and southern areas towards the end of the period. Updated: 1141 on Wed 27 Jan 2010 That doesn't seem unreasonable to me, based on the 00Z/06Z runs (or even going by the subsequent 12Z runs come to that, which haven't greatly changed things). -- John Hall "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people from coughing." Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83) yes there is a UK ensemble we don't get to see, I believe they give slightly higher weighting to each of operational runs. They (the forecasters) I believe then look at anything which may have affected the model runs e.g. bad obs getting in. Jon or Will should be able to give more detail, or correct me. They rely on MetO and ECM and GFS ensembles backed up by their own ideas on how things are likely to develop. The entropy measure of the ensembles (uncertainty) is used for confidence indicators. Time-lagged ensembles also come into play as well. OP runs are put into the mix to see how they fit in with other ideas. Will -- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 28, 7:38*am, "Will Hand" wrote:
"Stan Kellett" wrote in message ... "John Hall" wrote in message .. . In article , TT writes: there seems to rumors that these are compiled from ouput that is 24hrs old? They are released around noon, which suggests that they will be using output from the ECM and UKMO 00Z runs, which would become available sometime around 7am. For the GFS, the 06Z run doesn't complete until about 10:30, which suggests that there might be time for a quick look at that. Remember that they'll be looking at the ensembles as well as the operational runs. (Is there a UKMO ensemble, which we don't get to see, or just the operational run?) They may give less weight to the GFS than to the other two models, since the UKMO isn't a stakeholder in it. UK Outlook for Monday 1 Feb 2010 to Wednesday 10 Feb 2010: Cold with overnight frost and ice throughout, but a good deal of dry and bright weather for many parts of the UK by day. However, wintry showers are likely for exposed northeastern parts throughout the period, with a risk of more persistent sleet or snow for some eastern areas at times on Monday. Rain, maybe hill snow, might reach the northwest on Tuesday. Wintry showers may spread further inland towards the end of the week as winds become more northeasterly. The mainly dry weather with frost, ice and possibly fog, is likely to continue for much of the rest of the period, with temperatures mostly below normal. However, wintry showers or more persistent snow could affect eastern and southern areas towards the end of the period. Updated: 1141 on Wed 27 Jan 2010 That doesn't seem unreasonable to me, based on the 00Z/06Z runs (or even going by the subsequent 12Z runs come to that, which haven't greatly changed things). -- John Hall * * * * * "Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people * * * * * *from coughing." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Sir Ralph Richardson (1902-83) yes there is a UK ensemble we don't get to see, I believe they give slightly higher weighting to each of operational runs. They (the forecasters) I believe then look at anything which may have affected the model runs e.g. bad obs getting in. Jon or Will should be able to give more detail, or correct me. They rely on MetO and ECM and GFS ensembles backed up by their own ideas on how things are likely to develop. The entropy measure of the ensembles (uncertainty) is used for confidence indicators. Time-lagged ensembles also come into play as well. OP runs are put into the mix to see how they fit in with other ideas. Will --- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The trouble is that with all this "mix", which sounds enormously complex and scientifically careful and precise, the outcomes when you get to 10 days and beyond are so poor that the forecasters lump the whole possible gamut of weather into this 150 word 1984-style exercise in double-plus-ungood ex language reduction for the public! It actually tells you next to nothing and we are often reduced to guesswork as to what the forecast actually means. Each daily precis is then quietly forgotten and the only statistics that are ever produced for forecasts at this distance are so vague as to be next to useless. I think the public deserves either better forecasting - which presently is not possible at 10 days plus; increases in accuracy at forecasting the UK weather at 10-days plus has stalled IMO, unlike accuracy at 3-5 days, which has shown significant improvement - or far better information and explanation as to why what they are seeing may well not prove correct. Finding any accuracy figures on the MetO site is not easy. This is an example: Try typing "forecast accuracy" into the MetO site search engine. The matches lead you to several pages in the "about us" section. You can find Brier Skill Scores for rainfall forecast accuracy, but try finding at what distance out the accuracy scores are for. 3 days? 1 day? 10 days? All rainfall forecasts?? Dunno??? http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat.../rainfall.html Same for temperature, Looks like the MetO are achieving targets recently - but again, at what distance out?? How can anyone judge how well the MetO is doing from that? http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/corporat...tion/temp.html There are other pages, showing Brier Skill Scores over time, but finding them on the site is hellishly difficult (I gave up; I'm sure someone will lead me to them, with the implied hubris that they are there so why didn't you find them?) When you do. it gives you no indication whatsoever of the accuracy of this particular 6-15 day forecast. I think the public deserves better. The reader is forced into their own research, which is interesting but does not pinpoint MetO 10 day accuracy at all. For example: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/ost/climate/...huq_032509.htm http://www.bom.gov.au/amm/docs/2009/wu2.pdf The NOAA figures for 5/6 day accuracy are well known and the MetO does OK compared to other models. http://www.emc.ncep.noaa.gov/gmb/STATS/STATS.html The conclusions that I'm drawn to are the same ones as are being raised in the present debate over seasonal forecasting. 1. Acknowledge the difficulties of forecasting at 6 days+ and explain them fully on the site before issuing these forecasts. The MetO is painfully *useless* at doing this. The "expert", "we know best", MetO mentality is one that they could do with ameliorating immediately to forge a better relationship with their public. 2. Allow the public (who pay for the MetO, remember), access to *all* the data sources the forecasters use and be far more clear about why a particular 6-15 day forecast has been phrased the way it has and what the chances are of it coming to pass and why. 3. Admit to the present shortcomings (not the MetO's fault, really; presently NWP only allows so much) and abandon forecasting to the public, beyond a particular distance, as the accuracy is so low. There is much debate about whether the seasonal forecasts should be continued. I think the same debate about whether this 6-15 day forecast should be continued is justified. At the moment there is a bald forecast: "This is what we think this will happen at 6-15 days". Unfortunately there is nothing to tell the public that anything above 10 days is actually less likely to come true than it it is likely to actually come true..........apart from an advert for boiler repairs for British Gas. *)) |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If we all lived in Siberia and were under a 1050 high that was not
moving, a 15 day forcast might be do-able. Alas a butterflies fart can change the wx in the UK, as we all know. Buckets full of rain expected here this weekend and a snowstorm "up north". Michael. Orange Park, FL. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Met Met Office explanation of Heathrow record | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Met Office three-month forecast was; "not helpful" shakes head | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Met Office Day 16-30 'Forecast' | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Anyone like to comment on JB's winter forecast to date? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
October CET table not up to date? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |