Buchan Meteo wrote:
Dave Cornwell scrive:
I couldn't endure East Enders for even
one minute, nor my wife who was born within the sound of Bow Bells. ;-)

You can't endure your wife for a minute? Poor wife!


------------------
Poor me! The difference a "could" can make ;-)
Dave

Graham P Davis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:17:08 +0000
Martin Brown wrote:

On 17/11/2011 09:04, Graham P Davis wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:16:51 -0800 (PST)
wrote:

The BBC yesterday morning made big deal with their usual big
brother tripe about a BMA report on smoking in cars and how
harmful it is
And they showed both sides of the argument. Vox-pops had views
across the board and the Forest spokesman gave his view in
opposition to that of the BMA. Are you saying they should have
ignored it altogether? Censorship of the news? Is that what you
want?
You have your attributions wrong. It was a Lawrence demented OT rant.

Sorry about that. No idea how I answered the wrong post. Should have
noticed I'd got the wrong one when I started snipping.

The main problem I have with people smoking in cars is that whilst
they are rooting around in the glove compartment for their next fix
they drive into the back of stationary traffic or drift out of lane.
I don't really care if they gas themselves with tobacco smoke in
their own car.


Agreed. There's no need for a new law to deal with the first problem -
"driving without due care and attention" should cover it. That also
catches the sweet-unwrappers, sandwich-munchers, CD-changers, etc.


------------------
Whilst I agree, are you honestly saying you have never done any of the
above including those under etc. like changing the volume on your old
Motorola, in your driving lifetime?

WELL SAID MY MAN


its all bull****

On 17/11/2011 12:20 AM, Lawrence13 wrote:


Really? They are a disparate bunch of bitter hedonistic opportunist
minority groups and rabid lefty luvvies. You only have to endure East
Enders for ten minutes to sum them up. Having been through the left,
you can recognise the loathing self hatred on 90 k per year on
license fee money; at the drop of a hat.

The BBC yesterday morning made big deal with their usual big brother
tripe about a BMA report on smoking in cars and how harmful it is to,
diddy, diddums, children. Well I hate smoking, being a non smoker but
the BMA? I think they'd fare far better dealing with MRSA in the NHS
which has killed over thirty thousand people in the UK in just five
years and that's without those that were very ill and the barrier
nursing required to try and contain the infection. Or if they are
really serious about a present danger to live then maybe they could
address abortion-which the NHS and BMA condone regardless of the fact
that 200,000 odd babies are killed every year.

You know I don't want to drop names but my ex father in law was a
professor of paediatrics and he ran a dedicated team trying to save
premature babies being born at 22 weeks and everyone applauded that
virtuous dedication. Yet meanwhile a couple of floors below there was
another team dedicated to killing babies at 26 weeks and everyone -
especially the left stayed very, very, silent.

Nothing to do with weather and AGW regarding Frozen Planet but Dave
created the opportunity. Me? I don't care as Orwell said

In a time of universal deceit Telling the truth is it's self a
revolutionary act.

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:13:28 +0000
Dave Cornwell wrote:

Graham P Davis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:17:08 +0000
Martin Brown wrote:

On 17/11/2011 09:04, Graham P Davis wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:16:51 -0800 (PST)
wrote:

The BBC yesterday morning made big deal with their usual big
brother tripe about a BMA report on smoking in cars and how
harmful it is
And they showed both sides of the argument. Vox-pops had views
across the board and the Forest spokesman gave his view in
opposition to that of the BMA. Are you saying they should have
ignored it altogether? Censorship of the news? Is that what you
want?
You have your attributions wrong. It was a Lawrence demented OT
rant.

Sorry about that. No idea how I answered the wrong post. Should have
noticed I'd got the wrong one when I started snipping.

The main problem I have with people smoking in cars is that whilst
they are rooting around in the glove compartment for their next fix
they drive into the back of stationary traffic or drift out of
lane. I don't really care if they gas themselves with tobacco
smoke in their own car.


Agreed. There's no need for a new law to deal with the first
problem - "driving without due care and attention" should cover it.
That also catches the sweet-unwrappers, sandwich-munchers,
CD-changers, etc.


------------------
Whilst I agree, are you honestly saying you have never done any of
the above including those under etc. like changing the volume on your
old Motorola, in your driving lifetime?

I'm not honestly saying that or even dishonestly saying that. We do
stupid things when we're younger and then later realise how stupid we
were and stop doing them. Then, as we grow older, we find different
stupid things to do. Older still, we forget what things are stupid and
do lots of stupid things.

--
Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks. E-mail: change boy to man
Teach evolution, not creationism: http://evolutionnotcreationism.org.uk/

On Nov 17, 9:26*pm, Graham P Davis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:13:28 +0000





Dave Cornwell wrote:
Graham P Davis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:17:08 +0000
Martin Brown wrote:

On 17/11/2011 09:04, Graham P Davis wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:16:51 -0800 (PST)
*wrote:

The BBC yesterday *morning made *big deal with their usual big
brother tripe about a BMA report on smoking in cars and how
harmful it *is
And they showed both sides of the argument. Vox-pops had views
across the board and the Forest spokesman gave his view in
opposition to that of the BMA. Are you saying they should have
ignored it altogether? Censorship of the news? Is that what you
want?
You have your attributions wrong. It was a Lawrence demented OT
rant.

Sorry about that. No idea how I answered the wrong post. Should have
noticed I'd got the wrong one when I started snipping.

The main problem I have with people smoking in cars is that whilst
they are rooting around in the glove compartment for their next fix
they drive into the back of stationary traffic or drift out of
lane. I don't really care if they gas themselves with tobacco
smoke in their own car.

Agreed. There's no need for a new law to deal with the first
problem - "driving without due care and attention" should cover it.
That also catches the sweet-unwrappers, sandwich-munchers,
CD-changers, etc.

------------------
Whilst I agree, are you honestly saying you have never done any of
the above including those under etc. like changing the volume on your
old Motorola, in your driving lifetime?

I'm not honestly saying that or even dishonestly saying that. We do
stupid things when we're younger and then later realise how stupid we
were and stop doing them. Then, as we grow older, we find different
stupid things to do. Older still, we forget what things are stupid and
do lots of stupid things.

--
Graham Davis, Bracknell, Berks. E-mail: change boy to man
Teach evolution, not creationism:http://evolutionnotcreationism.org.uk/- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

That is so true!

"Graham P Davis" wrote in message
news:20111117212641.467935fd@home-1...
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:13:28 +0000
Dave Cornwell wrote:

Graham P Davis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:17:08 +0000
Martin Brown wrote:

On 17/11/2011 09:04, Graham P Davis wrote:
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:16:51 -0800 (PST)
wrote:

The BBC yesterday morning made big deal with their usual big
brother tripe about a BMA report on smoking in cars and how
harmful it is
And they showed both sides of the argument. Vox-pops had views
across the board and the Forest spokesman gave his view in
opposition to that of the BMA. Are you saying they should have
ignored it altogether? Censorship of the news? Is that what you
want?
You have your attributions wrong. It was a Lawrence demented OT
rant.

Sorry about that. No idea how I answered the wrong post. Should have
noticed I'd got the wrong one when I started snipping.

The main problem I have with people smoking in cars is that whilst
they are rooting around in the glove compartment for their next fix
they drive into the back of stationary traffic or drift out of
lane. I don't really care if they gas themselves with tobacco
smoke in their own car.


Agreed. There's no need for a new law to deal with the first
problem - "driving without due care and attention" should cover it.
That also catches the sweet-unwrappers, sandwich-munchers,
CD-changers, etc.


------------------
Whilst I agree, are you honestly saying you have never done any of
the above including those under etc. like changing the volume on your
old Motorola, in your driving lifetime?

I'm not honestly saying that or even dishonestly saying that. We do
stupid things when we're younger and then later realise how stupid we
were and stop doing them. Then, as we grow older, we find different
stupid things to do. Older still, we forget what things are stupid and
do lots of stupid things.


And some people are just plain stupid!

Will
--

In message , Martin Brown
writes

The main problem I have with people smoking in cars is that whilst they
are rooting around in the glove compartment for their next fix they
drive into the back of stationary traffic or drift out of lane. I don't
really care if they gas themselves with tobacco smoke in their own car.



A ' real ' smoker wouldn't have that problem. Fags always readily to
hand in the car is my motto. Except when the missus is in of course,
then they are banned altogether. .
--

Jim

what type of fag

On 17/11/2011 9:41 PM, Jim Kewley wrote:
Fags always readily to
hand in the car

In message , The Texican
writes
what type of fag

On 17/11/2011 9:41 PM, Jim Kewley wrote:
Fags always readily to
hand in the car


The type smoked, so I won't be troubling you for your services.
--

Jim Kewley

yeah you would know

On 17/11/2011 10:03 PM, Jim Kewley wrote:


The type smoked, so I won't be troubling you for your services.