Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) (uk.sci.weather) For the discussion of daily weather events, chiefly affecting the UK and adjacent parts of Europe, both past and predicted. The discussion is open to all, but contributions on a practical scientific level are encouraged. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Disclaimer: This is a serious question which has everything to do with
how to count and nothing to do with religious beliefs. I ask it here because some wise heads are present. The date 1AD refers to the year a man I will call Yesus was born. It is irrelevant whether it actually happened or not. Most of the world did not know about it at the time anyway. News of the event did not reach the British Isles for a very long time so my question is this: In the British Isles during the year we now call 1AD, what was the date (year only)? I don't even know how to look it up. I am aware of the Gregorian, Julian, and AUC calendars but I don't want to know what the date was in Rome. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 14 March 2016 15:52:47 UTC, Asha Santon wrote:
Disclaimer: This is a serious question which has everything to do with how to count and nothing to do with religious beliefs. I ask it here because some wise heads are present. The date 1AD refers to the year a man I will call Yesus was born. It is irrelevant whether it actually happened or not. Most of the world did not know about it at the time anyway. News of the event did not reach the British Isles for a very long time so my question is this: In the British Isles during the year we now call 1AD, what was the date (year only)? I don't even know how to look it up. I am aware of the Gregorian, Julian, and AUC calendars but I don't want to know what the date was in Rome. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland Interesting question, but surely misdirected in these scribblings. Can't help you. Tudor Hughes |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 3:52:47 PM UTC, Asha Santon wrote:
Disclaimer: This is a serious question which has everything to do with how to count and nothing to do with religious beliefs. I ask it here because some wise heads are present. The date 1AD refers to the year a man I will call Yesus was born. It is irrelevant whether it actually happened or not. Most of the world did not know about it at the time anyway. News of the event did not reach the British Isles for a very long time so my question is this: In the British Isles during the year we now call 1AD, what was the date (year only)? I don't even know how to look it up. I am aware of the Gregorian, Julian, and AUC calendars but I don't want to know what the date was in Rome. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland It wasn't 1 AD anywhere. That number was allocated many years later. It was 754 AUC in Rome. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ab_urbe_condita In the British Isles each tribe would have its own chronicles based on king lists, but no numerical scheme which was only introduced later by the Church. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 4:47:27 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote:
On Monday, 14 March 2016 15:52:47 UTC, Asha Santon wrote: Disclaimer: This is a serious question which has everything to do with how to count and nothing to do with religious beliefs. I ask it here because some wise heads are present. The date 1AD refers to the year a man I will call Yesus was born. It is irrelevant whether it actually happened or not. Most of the world did not know about it at the time anyway. News of the event did not reach the British Isles for a very long time so my question is this: In the British Isles during the year we now call 1AD, what was the date (year only)? I don't even know how to look it up. I am aware of the Gregorian, Julian, and AUC calendars but I don't want to know what the date was in Rome. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland Interesting question, but surely misdirected in these scribblings. Can't help you. Tudor Hughes Surely it wasn't 1 AD, as that wouldn't occur until a year later. That being said, Christmas Day should be the start of the New Year, so we've all got it wrong. Well I probably have anyway. Anyway, with AGW and all other threats we are facing, I suggest we stop counting up and start counting all over from 0, with a sweepstake to be won by whoever gets the end of the world date correct. (Prize to be collected posthumously). Starting from now, I'm going for 127, 13 May, approximately 1321 BST. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Mitchell wrote:
I suggest we stop counting up and start counting all over from 0, with a sweepstake to be won by whoever gets the end of the world date correct. My guess is about 5 billion years from now. -- Brian Wakem Lower Bourne, Farnham, Surrey http://www.brianwakem.co.uk/weather |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 5:35:51 PM UTC, Brian Wakem wrote:
David Mitchell wrote: I suggest we stop counting up and start counting all over from 0, with a sweepstake to be won by whoever gets the end of the world date correct. My guess is about 5 billion years from now. -- Brian Wakem Lower Bourne, Farnham, Surrey http://www.brianwakem.co.uk/weather Slightly less pessimistic than me Brian. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 5:16:32 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote:
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 4:47:27 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote: On Monday, 14 March 2016 15:52:47 UTC, Asha Santon wrote: Disclaimer: This is a serious question which has everything to do with how to count and nothing to do with religious beliefs. I ask it here because some wise heads are present. The date 1AD refers to the year a man I will call Yesus was born. It is irrelevant whether it actually happened or not. Most of the world did not know about it at the time anyway. News of the event did not reach the British Isles for a very long time so my question is this: In the British Isles during the year we now call 1AD, what was the date (year only)? I don't even know how to look it up. I am aware of the Gregorian, Julian, and AUC calendars but I don't want to know what the date was in Rome. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland Interesting question, but surely misdirected in these scribblings. Can't help you. Tudor Hughes Surely it wasn't 1 AD, as that wouldn't occur until a year later. That being said, Christmas Day should be the start of the New Year, so we've all got it wrong. Well I probably have anyway. Anyway, with AGW and all other threats we are facing, I suggest we stop counting up and start counting all over from 0, with a sweepstake to be won by whoever gets the end of the world date correct. (Prize to be collected posthumously). Starting from now, I'm going for 127, 13 May, approximately 1321 BST. Yes, but no-one has decided the start date yet: http://www.nature.com/news/anthropoc...an-age-1.17085 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-03-14 17:10:15 +0000, Alastair said:
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 3:52:47 PM UTC, Asha Santon wrote: Disclaimer: This is a serious question which has everything to do with how to count and nothing to do with religious beliefs. I ask it here because some wise heads are present. The date 1AD refers to the year a man I will call Yesus was born. It is irrelevant whether it actually happened or not. Most of the world did not know about it at the time anyway. News of the event did not reach the British Isles for a very long time so my question is this: In the British Isles during the year we now call 1AD, what was the date (year only)? I don't even know how to look it up. I am aware of the Gregorian, Julian, and AUC calendars but I don't want to know what the date was in Rome. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland In the British Isles each tribe would have its own chronicles based on king lists, but no numerical scheme which was only introduced later by the Church. Ah good. That was what I hoped. Thank you. I shall leave you all in peace now. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:16:30 -0700 (PDT)
David Mitchell wrote: Surely it wasn't 1 AD, as that wouldn't occur until a year later. That being said, Christmas Day should be the start of the New Year, so we've all got it wrong. Well I probably have anyway. 1 AD was set as the year in which Jesus was supposed to have been both conceived and born, so that means that his birthday should be celebrated near the end of the year. This also means he became a year old at the end of 2 AD. When (almost) everyone (not me) celebrated the new Millennium a year early on Jan 1st 2000, the C-of-E had already celebrated Christ's 2000th birthday a couple of years early, on Dec 25th 1999, when it should have occurred on Christmas Day 2001. -- Graham P Davis, Bracknell, Berks. [Retd meteorologist/programmer] http://www.scarlet-jade.com/ I wear the cheese. It does not wear me. Posted with Claws: http://www.claws-mail.org/ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 14 March 2016 19:32:36 UTC, Alastair wrote:
On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 5:16:32 PM UTC, David Mitchell wrote: On Monday, March 14, 2016 at 4:47:27 PM UTC, Tudor Hughes wrote: On Monday, 14 March 2016 15:52:47 UTC, Asha Santon wrote: Disclaimer: This is a serious question which has everything to do with how to count and nothing to do with religious beliefs. I ask it here because some wise heads are present. The date 1AD refers to the year a man I will call Yesus was born. It is irrelevant whether it actually happened or not. Most of the world did not know about it at the time anyway. News of the event did not reach the British Isles for a very long time so my question is this: In the British Isles during the year we now call 1AD, what was the date (year only)? I don't even know how to look it up. I am aware of the Gregorian, Julian, and AUC calendars but I don't want to know what the date was in Rome. -- Asha minnies.opcop.org.uk Scotland Interesting question, but surely misdirected in these scribblings. Can't help you. Tudor Hughes Surely it wasn't 1 AD, as that wouldn't occur until a year later. That being said, Christmas Day should be the start of the New Year, so we've all got it wrong. Well I probably have anyway. Anyway, with AGW and all other threats we are facing, I suggest we stop counting up and start counting all over from 0, with a sweepstake to be won by whoever gets the end of the world date correct. (Prize to be collected posthumously). Starting from now, I'm going for 127, 13 May, approximately 1321 BST. Yes, but no-one has decided the start date yet: http://www.nature.com/news/anthropoc...an-age-1.17085 I know you were pointing Gianna in the right direction but that article is full of self human hate we are nothing but bacteria to the mass of the earth. What a load of dramatic twaddle. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
It's Saturday night! I bet Bushy Salami and Dan Foster are out on a date! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
It's Saturday night! Is Dan Foster and Bushy Slami out on a date? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
October CET table not up to date? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Record Max and Min for each date in February | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Month-to-date rainfall | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |