Weatherlawyer wrote:
MAP 6.0 2005/12/30 18:26:46 7.562 -82.217 20.0 SOUTH OF PANAMA
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqs...uakes_all.html

Who's a clever boy then?
Now we can spend the next spell (31 DEC. (03:12) to 6 JAN. (18:56))
watching as the other shoes drop.

If there is no link between earthquakes and the weather, you can call
me American.

The Panamanian quake has since been marked down to:
MAP 5.7 2005/12/30 18:26:44 7.535 -82.222 10.0 SOUTH OF PANAMA

Which just goes to show what modern interpretation is worth. I have
come to realise that harassing lost sheep is not productive of anything
useful, so I shall let that go. Poor dears.

Anyway I am still on the ball even though the present high runs will
just be 5's.

Or not, as the case may be.

"Weatherlawyer" wrote in
ups.com:

Snipola
The Panamanian quake has since been marked down to:
MAP 5.7 2005/12/30 18:26:44 7.535 -82.222 10.0 SOUTH OF PANAMA

Which just goes to show what modern interpretation is worth. I have
come to realise that harassing lost sheep is not productive of anything
useful, so I shall let that go. Poor dears.
Snipola

Still think there's a big conspiracy regarding quake magnitudes, eh?

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

Bob Harrington wrote in
:

"?B?SmEg4pml?=" wrote in
oups.com:

I usually get severely impacted just before a large
earthquake.

I got severely impacted ~during~ our last quake in Seattle
- by a book off the shelf over the bed. Almost scared the
Sh*t out of me...


Oddly enough, nothing came off my shelves. I'm down in
Auburn.

--Damon, waiting for the next one

Damon Hill wrote in
6:

Bob Harrington wrote in
:

"?B?SmEg4pml?=" wrote in
oups.com:

I usually get severely impacted just before a large
earthquake.

I got severely impacted ~during~ our last quake in Seattle
- by a book off the shelf over the bed. Almost scared the
Sh*t out of me...


Oddly enough, nothing came off my shelves. I'm down in
Auburn.

I've got rather sloppy shelves. =}

--Damon, waiting for the next one

Well, as long as it's no bigger than the last one. And you are a lot
closer to that loose pile of rocks we call Mt. Rainier...

Weatherlawyer wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
MAP 6.0 2005/12/30 18:26:46 7.562 -82.217 20.0 SOUTH OF PANAMA
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqs...uakes_all.html

Who's a clever boy then?
Now we can spend the next spell (31 DEC. (03:12) to 6 JAN. (18:56))
watching as the other shoes drop.

If there is no link between earthquakes and the weather, you can call
me American.

The Panamanian quake has since been marked down to:
MAP 5.7 2005/12/30 18:26:44 7.535 -82.222 10.0 SOUTH OF PANAMA

Which just goes to show what modern interpretation is worth. I have
come to realise that harassing lost sheep is not productive of anything
useful, so I shall let that go. Poor dears.

Anyway I am still on the ball even though the present high runs will just be 5's.

Or not, as the case may be.

Head in the stars, sripes on my arse, my face red and paint my white
arse the colour of a pesidential behind.

Or not as the case may be.

At the risk of seeming to qualify to vote for a monkey, can anyone
point me to a site for the weather in California? And another one that
explains how two 7+ mags occur at the same time of day:

7.1 2006/01/02 22:13 FIJI REGION
7.3 2006/01/02 06:10 EAST OF THE SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS

You're doing "a heckuv a job" over here in headinsandville :~)

I know I shouldn't laugh. It's counterproductive and all that. But I
just love coincidences.
Bye, bye (that's a drive bye-bye shooting. Sleep tight.)

On 2 Jan 2006 19:47:27 -0800, "Weatherlawyer"
wrote:



At the risk of seeming to qualify to vote for a monkey, can anyone
point me to a site for the weather in California? And another one that
explains how two 7+ mags occur at the same time of day:





Here is for part of Californai, links to the rest:

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/

Charles wrote:

Here is one for part of California, it links to the rest:

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/

OK. Liked the green bits:
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/total_foreca...ounty=c ac029
What have you got on mining and air disasters?

You're not going to "step over into Macedonia" are you? Be careful of
these ostriches ostrichising you.

Bob Harrington wrote in
:

Damon Hill wrote in
6:

Bob Harrington wrote in
:

"?B?SmEg4pml?=" wrote in
oups.com
:

I usually get severely impacted just before a large
earthquake.

I got severely impacted ~during~ our last quake in
Seattle - by a book off the shelf over the bed. Almost
scared the Sh*t out of me...


Oddly enough, nothing came off my shelves. I'm down in
Auburn.

I've got rather sloppy shelves. =}

--Damon, waiting for the next one

Well, as long as it's no bigger than the last one. And you
are a lot closer to that loose pile of rocks we call Mt.
Rainier...

That's true; I live a stone's throw from the White River.
A big landslide on the north side of Rainier would have me
leaving the house in a hurry, rather than hoping Mud Mountain
Dam could contain the resulting lahar. But it's more likely
that Orting, Sumner and Puyallup/Tacoma would be at greater
risk.

http://www.historylink.org/output.cfm?file_id=3584

http://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Public...sitename=MMD_I
W&pagename=mainpage

--Damon

Weatherlawyer wrote:
MAP 6.0 2005/12/30 18:26:46 7.562 -82.217 20.0 SOUTH OF PANAMA
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/recenteqs...uakes_all.html

Who's a clever boy then?
Now we can spend the next spell (31 DEC. (03:12) to 6 JAN. (18:56))
watching as the other shoes drop.

Sad as the Mining disaster was there is something inherent in the
mining industy that you are at risk while at work. I am in sympathey
with all those who died.

But I have more sympathy for those innocents killed in their beds,
secure in the belief a malevolent force was protecting them:

"TIKRIT, Iraq, Jan. 3 -- A U.S. air strike that Americans said was
directed at suspected bombers killed a family of 12 in their home north
of Baghdad Monday night, Iraqi officials said Tuesday. A Washington
Post special correspondent watched as rescuers removed the bodies of
women and children still in their nightclothes."

Even more sadly; this year we are in for more record breaking floods
and such disasters as the mining one along with what might well prove
to be the most active year on the books for earthquakes and volcanic
eruptions.

Weatherlawyer wrote:
Charles wrote:

Here is one for part of California, it links to the rest:

http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/lox/

OK. Liked the green bits:
http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/total_foreca...ounty=c ac029

On Thursday (12 Jan 06) according to the BBC, Mozambique and along the
Limpopo (Blantyre) had severe flooding continuing the rainy season's
floods in that part of the world.

http://www.awf.org/heartlands/limpopo/map.php
Africa is geared more to strip mining than facilities for inhabitants:
http://www.google.com/search?num=100...er&btnG=Search
Try this:
http://www.sabcnews.com/africa/south...119271,00.html

Meanwhile, Ayr in Australia recieved 2" of rain while Townsville just
down the coast, got 4". At this time of year it is "normally pretty
dry in the South West in January." But the remnants of Hurricane
Clare dropped over 10" (261 millimeters) in 36 hours on Lake Grace
just down from Perth.(From the BBC's WeatherView.)

http://www.weatherzone.com.au/charts....jsp?chart=sum

Now would be a good time to warn people about going down mines and up
into clouds. There is a treble occluded front slated for the NW
Atlantic the first half of this week.