alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 6th 06, 06:37 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default Much as I like being right...

I seem to have lost a plethora of mag 7+ earthquakes. (Yes I know it's
not Thor'sday yet.)

The First Law of the occurrence of earthquakes is that (for the North
Atlantic basin for example) as the magnitude of the high pressure air
masses increases and the magnitue of the low pressure air systems
decreases (or is that an increse.. ? no.. I want to steer clear of
positive and negative terms...) then the magnitude of earthquakes
earthwide increases.

The same holds true for the reverse effect, that as the pressures of
the air systems become or remain similar, the magnitude of earthquakes
diminishes or remains small.

The second law might be that the numbers of quakes earthwide remain the
same but the numbers of large quakes increases with the increase of the
magnitude, except that as the number of sevee quakes rises the numbers
tend to diminish.

There is a degree of difficulty involved with analysing the second law
as the signals rely on human interpretation and the signals themselves
may interfere with the ones for smaller quakes and mask them.

Perhaps a more expert appraisal of that problem can be supplied by a
rational poster. I still believe there are one or two of them on
sci.geo.earthquakes.

The third law of course, remains that for storms in the Northern Indian
Ocean and East Pacific (the Asian side of it) there is a localising
effect for earthquakes.

More practiced observers will have noted that the warnings posted by
R.Shanmugasundaram (at http://earthquake.itgo.com/today.htm ) also link
to the typhoons and severe storms that occur in his region.

In fact they tend to occur on an arc focussed on his observatory
cutting the sites he predicts.


  #2   Report Post  
Old September 7th 06, 01:19 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2005
Posts: 11
Default Much as I like being right...


Weatherlawyer wrote:
I seem to have lost a plethora of mag 7+ earthquakes. (Yes I know it's
not Thor'sday yet.)

The First Law of the occurrence of earthquakes is that (for the North
Atlantic basin for example) as the magnitude of the high pressure air
masses increases and the magnitue of the low pressure air systems
decreases (or is that an increse.. ? no.. I want to steer clear of
positive and negative terms...) then the magnitude of earthquakes
earthwide increases.

The same holds true for the reverse effect, that as the pressures of
the air systems become or remain similar, the magnitude of earthquakes
diminishes or remains small.

The second law might be that the numbers of quakes earthwide remain the
same but the numbers of large quakes increases with the increase of the
magnitude, except that as the number of sevee quakes rises the numbers
tend to diminish.

There is a degree of difficulty involved with analysing the second law
as the signals rely on human interpretation and the signals themselves
may interfere with the ones for smaller quakes and mask them.

Perhaps a more expert appraisal of that problem can be supplied by a
rational poster. I still believe there are one or two of them on
sci.geo.earthquakes.

The third law of course, remains that for storms in the Northern Indian
Ocean and East Pacific (the Asian side of it) there is a localising
effect for earthquakes.

More practiced observers will have noted that the warnings posted by
R.Shanmugasundaram (at http://earthquake.itgo.com/today.htm ) also link
to the typhoons and severe storms that occur in his region.

In fact they tend to occur on an arc focussed on his observatory
cutting the sites he predicts.


Hi Michael,

I haven't heard from Shan in awhile. I'm sure he's busy working. Tell
him I said hello when you chat the next time, please. Sorry, I can't
help you with the other bit, it's way beyond me. :-)

Petra

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 7th 06, 06:52 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default Much as I like being right...


Petra wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote:
I seem to have lost a plethora of mag 7+ earthquakes. (Yes I know it's
not Thor'sday yet.)


More practiced observers will have noted that the warnings posted by
R.Shanmugasundaram (at http://earthquake.itgo.com/today.htm ) also link
to the typhoons and severe storms that occur in his region.


I haven't heard from Shan in awhile. I'm sure he's busy working. Tell
him I said hello when you chat the next time, please.

I've not heard from himne in a while either.

Sorry, I can't help you with the other bit, it's way beyond me.


A forecaster last Sunday admitted that the models broke down for later
in the week and that it would be anyone's guess what would happen after
Thursday.

The presure systems I am talking about can be found on the UKMO Fax
Charts at Wetterzentrale, A German site hosted by Wetter3.de and
University of Koeln:
http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...racknell+13 2

The charts still show that the low pressure systems are fairly high.
(Around 1010 millibars - between Change and Fair on a barometer) And
although there is an anticyclone slated for tomorrow (Friday) this
present spell has been a wet one for us. It should have been a fine
spell.

I don't know what this next one (ushered in by the full moon on the 7th
is going to do) but it isn't one normally associated with sunny weather
and frosty nights. There is certainly a large magnitude quake on the
cards.

When it will come, if it comes I have no idea. The volcanic chambers
aound the world are all well stocked I imagine, so there is quite a lot
of potential that can't be added into the mix.

I doubt it will do much but of course things are still deep in the
woods so to speak. It must be galling for the scholars on here to know
absolutely nothing about any of this and be taken by surprise every
time another plate has a jump.

Poor little lost lambs.

Not by me anyway.

  #4   Report Post  
Old September 8th 06, 02:05 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2005
Posts: 11
Default Much as I like being right...


Weatherlawyer wrote:

More practiced observers will have noted that the warnings posted by
R.Shanmugasundaram (at http://earthquake.itgo.com/today.htm ) also link
to the typhoons and severe storms that occur in his region.

In fact they tend to occur on an arc focussed on his observatory
cutting the sites he predicts.



Michael,

Someone on sci-geo-geology gave me some valued words of advice
not so long ago. The person said to stop asking questions. After all
99% of the answers are out there anyway and it's funny because when
you stop asking they know you don't need them anymore.

While no man may be an island, every man/woman has to stand on
their own to know their true selves and in that they'll find the
foritude it
requires to hold the wind away, know who they are and decide what's
important to them.

For we are not here to look for adoration, but to do what we can or
must
and anything less makes us keep asking, and then they own us instead
of owning ourselves. As Shan so aptly said, "the world is your stage,
play your part well."

This morning Yanni sounds well in "If I could tell you." But I can't
tell
you the whole story, only a fraction thereof. Don't think, but "know"

instead and then you'll see it all before you.

Spirit Light's coming with friends who know how to dance in the light.

Until tomorrow my friend, until tomorrow.....

http://www.petrachallusquakepredictions.com/index.html

Petra

(your last message cannot be responded to as the post button is missing
there)

  #5   Report Post  
Old September 12th 06, 08:25 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default Much as I like being right...


Weatherlawyer wrote:

Poor little lost lambs.


I'm feeling a little sheepish at the moment. The weather is exactly as
it should have been last spell and with it is a touch of the misty
stuff that causes hurricana.

To top it off the negative oscillation is back to a certain extent at
lest, as it shows in the NEIC lists up until about that quake in the
Gulf of Mexico.

Poor, little, lost lamb; BAH!



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jesus, like St Piers, was right about the weather Jim Cannon uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 February 4th 13 11:13 AM
Being sensible or being chicken licken Wendy Tinley uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 5 January 19th 13 08:31 PM
Around the world, thermometers point to 2010 as being hottest year since 1850 (It is NOT thermometers, it is adjusted temperatures that point to 2010 as being hottest year since 1850) Sapient Fridge sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 December 11th 10 01:58 PM
People That Like Mild Weather Being Unfairly Attacked BlueLightning uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 3 December 23rd 04 04:49 PM
Do you like it warm and dry? Do you like Bush? Jot Ross ne.weather.moderated (US North East Weather) 0 July 3rd 04 02:51 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017