alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 07, 05:36 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default All very clever but no cigar.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ano-video.html

Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters
out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be
required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the
outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or
greater:

http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...racknell+13 2

The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on
British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that
there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.)

The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the
fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media
weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of
Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no
difference in their art and vulcanology.)

What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a
large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with
it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff.

If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the
Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it
will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic
is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the
high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present.

That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong
indicator.

One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by
flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan.


  #2   Report Post  
Old July 7th 07, 04:10 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jul 2007
Posts: 18
Default All very clever but no cigar.

On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video....

Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters
out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be
required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the
outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or
greater:

http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br...

The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on
British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that
there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.)

The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the
fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media
weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of
Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no
difference in their art and vulcanology.)

What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a
large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with
it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff.

If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the
Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it
will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic
is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the
high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present.

That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong
indicator.

One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by
flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan.


Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big
show. What's your next precision forecast?

--mirage

  #3   Report Post  
Old July 7th 07, 07:01 PM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default All very clever but no cigar.

On Jul 7, 5:10 pm, mirage wrote:
On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:



http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video....


Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters
out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be
required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the
outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or
greater:


http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br...


The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on
British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that
there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.)


The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the
fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media
weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of
Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no
difference in their art and vulcanology.)


What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a
large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with
it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff.


If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the
Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it
will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic
is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the
high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present.


That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong
indicator.


One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by
flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan.


Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big
show. What's your next precision forecast?


Lost sheep here, at the moment.

It should be anticyclonic but it isn't.

And I couldn't see where the cyclone went to because my computer was
on the blink and I had to reforat (which is like a reformat but a
change in cultural learnings for make better the understand of the
weather.

I wish I had had the sense to back up my bookmarks before I started
messing but they were all safely tucked up in another partition.
Little did I know they only worked on browsers set up with SP 2 and
Javascript.

So I made some little changes...

Boy do I feel like a chump. Just a moment... where did I put those
bananas?

  #4   Report Post  
Old July 8th 07, 08:47 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default All very clever but no cigar.

On Jul 7, 8:01 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jul 7, 5:10 pm, mirage wrote:



On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video....


Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters
out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be
required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the
outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or
greater:


http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br...


The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on
British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that
there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.)


The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the
fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media
weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of
Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no
difference in their art and vulcanology.)


What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a
large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with
it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff.


If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the
Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it
will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic
is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the
high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present.


That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong
indicator.


One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by
flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan.


Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big
show. What's your next precision forecast?


Lost sheep here, at the moment.

It should be anticyclonic but it isn't.

And I couldn't see where the cyclone went to because my computer was
on the blink and I had to reforat (which is like a reformat but a
change in cultural learnings for make better the understand of the
weather.

I wish I had had the sense to back up my bookmarks before I started
messing but they were all safely tucked up in another partition.
Little did I know they only worked on browsers set up with SP 2 and
Javascript.

So I made some little changes...

Boy do I feel like a chump. Just a moment... where did I put those
bananas?


It hasn't been all bad though. I think that I can now fill in some of
the dots on this canvas before they occur:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/

Wouldn't that be nice.

On he
http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...k=june_27-3_07
you'd have to be a devotee to make any headway, as it is almost
impossible to see where increased activity occurs and what is normal
background activity world wide.

It didn't help that I couldn't find the link to the site last night.
Apparently I wasn't the only one having computer problems. I spent
most of the evening last night hunting for it, blaming myself and my
computer.

But that is by the by.

There doesn't appear to be much happening here despite the change in
the weather. The US storm warning page is totally blank and we have to
wait till Wednesday to get a report on the world wide activity on
volcanoes.

The alternative is three or four stations on every hill on the planet
and that they be maintained for centuries if not millenia.
Unfortunately the Chimp decided to squander the wealth of the only
nation capable of making a start on that and now a growing consensus
their seems to think that ALL citizens of the USA should have at least
emergency health care.

It's just too bad eh?

So it devolves onto us untermendioned to restore a service based on
weatherlore. And what could be wrong with that? Free, democratic,
uncensored, Open!, unlicensed and above all cheap.

  #5   Report Post  
Old July 13th 07, 02:18 AM posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.oceanography
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default All very clever but no cigar.

On Jul 8, 9:47 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jul 7, 8:01 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:



On Jul 7, 5:10 pm, mirage wrote:


On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video....


Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters
out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be
required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the
outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or
greater:


http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br...


The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on
British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that
there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.)


The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the
fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media
weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of
Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no
difference in their art and vulcanology.)


What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a
large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with
it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff.


If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the
Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it
will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic
is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the
high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present.


That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong
indicator.


One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by
flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan.


Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big
show. What's your next precision forecast?


Lost sheep here, at the moment.


It should be anticyclonic but it isn't.


And I couldn't see where the cyclone went to because my computer was
on the blink and I had to reforat (which is like a reformat but a
change in cultural learnings for make better the understand of the
weather.


I wish I had had the sense to back up my bookmarks before I started
messing but they were all safely tucked up in another partition.
Little did I know they only worked on browsers set up with SP 2 and
Javascript.


So I made some little changes...


Boy do I feel like a chump. Just a moment... where did I put those
bananas?


It hasn't been all bad though. I think that I can now fill in some of
the dots on this canvas before they occur:http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/

Wouldn't that be nice.

On hehttp://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...t=archive&year...
you'd have to be a devotee to make any headway, as it is almost
impossible to see where increased activity occurs and what is normal
background activity world wide.

It didn't help that I couldn't find the link to the site last night.
Apparently I wasn't the only one having computer problems. I spent
most of the evening last night hunting for it, blaming myself and my
computer.

But that is by the by.

There doesn't appear to be much happening here despite the change in
the weather. The US storm warning page is totally blank and we have to
wait till Wednesday to get a report on the world wide activity on
volcanoes.

The alternative is three or four stations on every hill on the planet
and that they be maintained for centuries if not millenia.
Unfortunately the Chimp decided to squander the wealth of the only
nation capable of making a start on that and now a growing consensus
their seems to think that ALL citizens of the USA should have at least
emergency health care.

It's just too bad eh?

So it devolves onto us untermendioned to restore a service based on
weatherlore. And what could be wrong with that? Free, democratic,
uncensored, Open!, unlicensed and above all cheap.


And not very effective too neither I might add. I hope that I am wrong
if the worst comes to the worst this week. But I left out the worst,
super-typhoons are associated with megaquakes in their region.

I just thought of that. High sixes anyway.



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[WR] Bolton - Close but no Cigar.... Col uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 June 1st 09 10:03 PM
Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorrygreenie weenies, but no cigar!!! Addinall sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 January 31st 09 12:43 AM
Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!! §tarkiller© sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 16 January 27th 09 02:38 PM
[WR] Haytor 12/6/06 (thunderstorm, but no cigar) Will Hand uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 June 12th 06 07:23 AM
Close but no Cigar danny \(west kent\) uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 December 28th 05 05:57 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017