Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...ano-video.html
Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or greater: http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...racknell+13 2 The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.) The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no difference in their art and vulcanology.) What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff. If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present. That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong indicator. One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video.... Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or greater: http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br... The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.) The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no difference in their art and vulcanology.) What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff. If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present. That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong indicator. One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan. Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big show. What's your next precision forecast? --mirage |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 7, 5:10 pm, mirage wrote:
On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video.... Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or greater: http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br... The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.) The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no difference in their art and vulcanology.) What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff. If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present. That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong indicator. One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan. Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big show. What's your next precision forecast? Lost sheep here, at the moment. It should be anticyclonic but it isn't. And I couldn't see where the cyclone went to because my computer was on the blink and I had to reforat (which is like a reformat but a change in cultural learnings for make better the understand of the weather. I wish I had had the sense to back up my bookmarks before I started messing but they were all safely tucked up in another partition. Little did I know they only worked on browsers set up with SP 2 and Javascript. So I made some little changes... Boy do I feel like a chump. Just a moment... where did I put those bananas? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 7, 8:01 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jul 7, 5:10 pm, mirage wrote: On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video.... Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or greater: http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br... The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.) The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no difference in their art and vulcanology.) What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff. If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present. That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong indicator. One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan. Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big show. What's your next precision forecast? Lost sheep here, at the moment. It should be anticyclonic but it isn't. And I couldn't see where the cyclone went to because my computer was on the blink and I had to reforat (which is like a reformat but a change in cultural learnings for make better the understand of the weather. I wish I had had the sense to back up my bookmarks before I started messing but they were all safely tucked up in another partition. Little did I know they only worked on browsers set up with SP 2 and Javascript. So I made some little changes... Boy do I feel like a chump. Just a moment... where did I put those bananas? It hasn't been all bad though. I think that I can now fill in some of the dots on this canvas before they occur: http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/ Wouldn't that be nice. On he http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...k=june_27-3_07 you'd have to be a devotee to make any headway, as it is almost impossible to see where increased activity occurs and what is normal background activity world wide. It didn't help that I couldn't find the link to the site last night. Apparently I wasn't the only one having computer problems. I spent most of the evening last night hunting for it, blaming myself and my computer. But that is by the by. There doesn't appear to be much happening here despite the change in the weather. The US storm warning page is totally blank and we have to wait till Wednesday to get a report on the world wide activity on volcanoes. The alternative is three or four stations on every hill on the planet and that they be maintained for centuries if not millenia. Unfortunately the Chimp decided to squander the wealth of the only nation capable of making a start on that and now a growing consensus their seems to think that ALL citizens of the USA should have at least emergency health care. It's just too bad eh? So it devolves onto us untermendioned to restore a service based on weatherlore. And what could be wrong with that? Free, democratic, uncensored, Open!, unlicensed and above all cheap. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 8, 9:47 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jul 7, 8:01 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Jul 7, 5:10 pm, mirage wrote: On Jul 2, 10:36 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-volcano-video.... Meanwhile of a more urgent time frame when this weather spell peters out in the next few days a lot of geophysical catching up will be required If this cyclone breaks into Norway as looks most likely, the outcome is going to be one or two quakes in the region of 7M or greater: http://www.westwind.ch/?link=ukmb,ht...e/Fax/,.gif,br... The only decent (only half decent this week) weatherforecast on British TV these days was last Sunday afternoon. It indicated that there would be some changes on the 4th and 5th (Thursday and Friday.) The next phase is on the 7th but of course one can not preclude the fireworks starting early. Look for some error in your local media weatherforecasts. At present, weather models can not take account of Seismic activity (even seismicky takers can't see there is no difference in their art and vulcanology.) What I can say is that the next spell is a very strong one, for a large high centred over the UK. Whenever it comes it will bring with it either a large magnitude quake or some very active volcanic stuff. If the remnants of the cyclone drifts over the Norwegian Sea into the Arctic, then the outcome will be volcanic. If it broaches at Norway it will be a large magnitude quake or two. The reason I suggest volcanic is that there is very little difference in the air pressure for the high and low systems in the North Atlantic at present. That is always a "good" sign, or perhaps I should say strong indicator. One way or another the change will be a relief for those afflicted by flooding in the US, the UK and Pakistan. Well, well, WL. I've had my brolly and travel chair ready for the big show. What's your next precision forecast? Lost sheep here, at the moment. It should be anticyclonic but it isn't. And I couldn't see where the cyclone went to because my computer was on the blink and I had to reforat (which is like a reformat but a change in cultural learnings for make better the understand of the weather. I wish I had had the sense to back up my bookmarks before I started messing but they were all safely tucked up in another partition. Little did I know they only worked on browsers set up with SP 2 and Javascript. So I made some little changes... Boy do I feel like a chump. Just a moment... where did I put those bananas? It hasn't been all bad though. I think that I can now fill in some of the dots on this canvas before they occur:http://www.spc.noaa.gov/products/wwa/ Wouldn't that be nice. On hehttp://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...t=archive&year... you'd have to be a devotee to make any headway, as it is almost impossible to see where increased activity occurs and what is normal background activity world wide. It didn't help that I couldn't find the link to the site last night. Apparently I wasn't the only one having computer problems. I spent most of the evening last night hunting for it, blaming myself and my computer. But that is by the by. There doesn't appear to be much happening here despite the change in the weather. The US storm warning page is totally blank and we have to wait till Wednesday to get a report on the world wide activity on volcanoes. The alternative is three or four stations on every hill on the planet and that they be maintained for centuries if not millenia. Unfortunately the Chimp decided to squander the wealth of the only nation capable of making a start on that and now a growing consensus their seems to think that ALL citizens of the USA should have at least emergency health care. It's just too bad eh? So it devolves onto us untermendioned to restore a service based on weatherlore. And what could be wrong with that? Free, democratic, uncensored, Open!, unlicensed and above all cheap. And not very effective too neither I might add. I hope that I am wrong if the worst comes to the worst this week. But I left out the worst, super-typhoons are associated with megaquakes in their region. I just thought of that. High sixes anyway. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
[WR] Bolton - Close but no Cigar.... | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorrygreenie weenies, but no cigar!!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Scientific data does not agree with the 'consensus'. Sorry greenie weenies, but no cigar!!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
[WR] Haytor 12/6/06 (thunderstorm, but no cigar) | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Close but no Cigar | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |