Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
30 Jul 00:48. Last week should have been a wet one but there were a
number of tropical or subtropical events going on along with a negative block to the weat of the North Atlantic. Some volcanic activity and a large magnitude quake too. Despite that some parts of the UK did get wet weather. Just not the place where I live which was extremely nice. The phase that starts this spell (5 Aug, 21:20, http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html) is an odd one. Normally -and in the absence of tropical storms, if the time of phase is 21:00, there will be a lot of thunderstorms. However the harmonic (or whatever) for this one is right on some sort of a cusp -unless I have missed my mark from other similar times. Some misty weather showed up on forecasts yesterday and someone on another weather newsgroup has reported thick fog. Thick fog portends more West Pacific cyclonic activity. And by inference from them, some magnificent dust storms. If you want to use a search engine to check that out against the Met Office's archive of such storms: http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/...2007/july.html and the above link to lunar phases might try this input: "dust ~storms" -Mars or ~"dust storms" -Mars The quotes keeps the phrase dust storms together while the ~ character makes some engines look for similar meanings or alternative words and the negative command stops the results from holding too many references to Martian dust storms. For some odd reason Usenet is populated with arguments about Martian dust storms. God knows why. Their speculation might be informative one day but not yet. Earth's dust storm on the other hand.... But there is no accounting for people and no reconciliation between democracy and sense. (I have never heard of a crowd making a wise decision when mustered to come to one.) |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 5, 11:31 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
30 Jul 00:48. Last week should have been a wet one but there were a number of tropical or subtropical events going on along with a negative block to the weat of the North Atlantic. Some volcanic activity and a large magnitude quake too. Despite that some parts of the UK did get wet weather. Just not the place where I live which was extremely nice. The phase that starts this spell (5 Aug, 21:20,http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html) is an odd one. Normally -and in the absence of tropical storms, if the time of phase is 21:00, there will be a lot of thunderstorms. However the harmonic (or whatever) for this one is right on some sort of a cusp -unless I have missed my mark from other similar times. Some misty weather showed up on forecasts yesterday and someone on another weather newsgroup has reported thick fog. Thick fog portends more West Pacific cyclonic activity. And by inference from them, some magnificent dust storms. If you want to use a search engine to check that out against the Met Office's archive of such storms:http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/...ulletins/2007/... and the above link to lunar phases might try this input: "dust ~storms" -Mars or ~"dust storms" -Mars The quotes keeps the phrase dust storms together while the ~ character makes some engines look for similar meanings or alternative words and the negative command stops the results from holding too many references to Martian dust storms. For some odd reason Usenet is populated with arguments about Martian dust storms. God knows why. Their speculation might be informative one day but not yet. Earth's dust storm on the other hand.... But there is no accounting for people and no reconciliation between democracy and sense. (I have never heard of a crowd making a wise decision when mustered to come to one.) More bang for the buck. An earlier storm has returned almost 3 hours later marking the times of high tide or something similar here. It would have been thundering some half to a full hour earlier in Abergele I imagine. I think if it isn't more than a few peals of thunder just now there will be a full frontal roarer just after midnight or maybe just after 3 am. I'd been toying with the idea of looking back at a fairly recent post to see just how far back a tropical or extra tropical cyclone in the West Pacific would turn the clock on this phase. Now it might have to wait while I switch off the box again. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|