Just thought I'd better throw this in fro future reference:
Tornado Watch Number 737
NWS Storm Prediction Center, Norman, OK.
1030 am cst sun nov 25 2007

Issued a tornado watch for portions of south central and south-east
Louisiana coastal waters effective this Sunday morning and afternoon
from 10:30 am until 5:00 pm CST.

Tornadoes...hail to 0.5 inch in diameter...thunderstorm wind gusts to
70 mph...and dangerous lightning are possible in these areas.

Approximately along and 50 miles north and south of a line from 40
miles west north-west of intra-coastal city Louisiana to 40 miles
south east of [where there used to be a place called] New Orleans.

A warm front will lift slowly nwd across srn LA through the afternoon
in advance of a mid level low over TX...and a surface low developing
newd toward sw LA. despite widespread clouds and limited surface
heating...boundary layer dewpoints in the upper 60s will contribute to
sbcape values of 500-1000 j/kg this afternoon
along and s of the warm front. vertical shear will be maximized along
the boundary...where super-cells and a tornado or two will be
possible. otherwise...isolated damaging winds can be expected with
the most intense storms.

Aviation...tornadoes and a few severe thunderstorms with hail surface
and aloft to 0.5 inch. Extreme turbulence and surface wind gusts to 60
knots. a few cumulonimbi with maximum tops to 500. mean storm motion
vector 24025.

....Thompson

Lots more snipped and any amount of it can be recovered in their
archives. The site has just been updated. It was excellent before, now
it is superb:
http://www.spc.noaa.gov/

jozef solc:

Location: Slovakia, Bratislava
Occupation: Engineer
My Hobbies/Interests: anti-hurricane technology, anti-tornado technology

http://www.wunderground.com/wximage/viewsingleimage.html?mode=singleimage&handle=antih urricane&number=6
http://www.topix.com/member/profile/antihurricane

his organization
http://www.ahtfund.org/en/category/a...lne_dokumenty/

trying to 'auction' his 'invention'
http://www.freepatentauction.com/patent.php?nb=1978

Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Nov 25, 10:53 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Nov 25, 10:22 am, antihurricane wrote:

New anti-hurricane technology

This dckweed is incapable of starting his own thread in order to
promulgate spam. Evidently his research has failed to inform him
anything of Nettiquette.

He may even be genuine:
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=who...ient=firefox-a

I gather he or she is Slovakian. I don't know what to make of that. I
posted something about Thomas Gold on sci.geo.earthquakes some time
back and drew a lot of fire from people more knowledgeable than I
about how Prof Gold had stolen his ideas from the Ruskis.

Not one of his detractors realised they were crediting the basic
science involved. Russian science is pretty good. In fact in all of
the communist states, schooling was very good.

I wonder what went wrong.

On 27 Nov, 22:57, "Paul T. Holland" wrote:

jozef solc:

Location: Slovakia, Bratislava
Occupation: Engineer
Hobbies/Interests: anti-hurricane technology, anti-tornado technology
http://www.wunderground.com/wximage/viewsingleimage.html?mode=singlei...http://www.topix.com/member/profile/antihurricane

his organizationhttp://www.ahtfund.org/en/category/ahtf/oficialne_dokumenty/

trying to 'auction' his 'invention'http://www.freepatentauction.com/patent.php?nb=1978

It is a pity his English is dire. Words in his site such as propaganda
probably are not what he meant.

"A METHOD OF AND A DEVICE FOR THE REDUCTION OF TROPICAL CYCLONES
DESTRUCTIVE FORCE.

Abstract:

The invention relates to a method and device for suppressing the
destructive force of a tropical cyclone, wherein the ascendent speed
of wind in the eyewall of a cyclone is reduced by sea water pumped on-
site from under the sea surface to above the surface, and then
dispersed in the wind at the bottom of the cyclone in/near its
eyewall.

Antihurricane Technology Fund (AHTF ahtfund org)
www.ahtfund.org

Fund support development, testing and propaganda of technologies that
are capable of avoiding spontaneous catastrophes or decrese them in
size, fundraising.

D: anti-hurricane fund, anti-cyclone fund, anti-typhoon fund,
hurricane fund, cyclone fund, typhoon fund, Katrina fund, fundraising,
fund raising, hurricane, fund

Hurricane active technology prevention
Energy from hurricane versus hurricane "

What happens in a cyclone is that it draws water from the sea and
feeds it up to where it falls out of solution. (on the way up it turns
from water to vapour to diffused gas.)

Because water laden air is so light, water as a gas is lighter than
air, it reaches heights where the mixture can be defracted the way
petrol is refined from crude.

Once the ice has melted and refrozen a few times it becomes more and
more pure and eventually turns into to the sort of water that doesn't
freeze at freezing point -which at different heights is at different
pressures and thus not the same for sea level and this is getting
quite complex isn't it.

Basically the gaseous water falls out of solution, falls through the
storm (which is moving across the ocean as well as rotating) and
eventually lands back in the sea behind the storm.

The sea is some 5 degrees cooler after the passing of a tropical
cyclone. In the North Atlantic temperature differences before and
after are about 3 degrees.

And before the storm there is a thick cloud layer that would
ordinarily close out the heat from the sea surface. This is all the
more noticeable the further north a cyclone goes. (Maybe that explains
the 2 degree difference between Tropical storms and Maritime ones?)

What I am trying to say is that hurricanes provide their own anti-
hurricane process. They consume/process about half a kiloton of
nuclear fission energy per minute or some such. That would take a fair
few ship's pumps to compete.

And after the storm?
The sky is now filled with water, the upper atmosphere is no longer
"inverted" (foggy.) The little fluffy clouds patching the sky from
horizon to horizon, are all reflecting and refracting sunlight.

And thus it always seems brighter after the storm.

I don't begrudge him his ideas but there is more than enough "kooky"
on this thread without his input. He should stick to his own threads.
OTOH, I'd rather listen to a thousand daft ideas from ardent
enthusiasts than one "it can't be done" from the lack-lustres and nay-
sayers.

Pity its always a thousand lack lusters and another thousand nay
sayers for every enthusiast.

On Nov 27, 6:57 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Now there are three. None of them especially powerful but obviously
they are in concert, able to change the spell from cold, clear and
frosty to warm, thick gloom

Oh man, I screwed that up.

This afternoon about 3-ish I saw a massive cloud that reminded me that
this spell is supposed to produce long billows of piscene black
clouds. This spell is what it would be if super-typhoons and their ilk
were not present.

They aren't:http://www.hurricanezone.net/

Several earthquakes are due, especially in the South Pacific and
Indian Ocean border:http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/FM/http://...quakes_big.php

Let me just say that I never said that the very large magnitude quakes
that occur at the end of a simialr sequence of weather spells or that
occur near the end of a simialr sequence of lunar spells, will be in
the South Pacific in the region I am associating with this present run
of largish earthquakes.

This 7.4 for example (and the Chilean one before it) were not due to
the demise of any one particular tropical storm but to the end of the
system of them.

7.4 Mag. 2007/11/29 19:00.
14.95 degrees North 61.24 degrees West. Martinique region, Windward
Islands.

The storms all lost most of their power some days ago. So it takes
from 1 to 3 days or more to show up in a large quake like this? Who
can say?

Who can say no? But it may just be a coincidence.

And there are an awful lot of them. Another word for remarkable
coincidences are miracles. Only miracles of course, have traditionally
been linked with forecasts well in advance.
Sort of.