Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 8, 7:06 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK but from where though? Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be replaced by deep lows to our north. On the TV storms and snow are forecast. There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on weather discussions here. No prizes for guessing what that means. I'm surprised that there wasn't a large mag for the hurricane force winds that blew through Britain yesterday. Perhaps the occluded front aimed at Scandinavia tomorrow: http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm will produce the absent miscreant. Meanwhile here are the scores for those Highs leaving USA so far this spell: 6.4 2008/01/10 01:37 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON 6.1 2008/01/09 14:40 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION 6.4 2008/01/09 08:26 WESTERN XIZANG |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think there will be an earthquake some time in the next 7 hours that
will destroy the Golden Gate Bridge. - Tom On Jan 10, 1:32*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Jan 8, 7:06 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: On Jan 8, 6:38 am, Weatherlawyer wrote: January the 8th and already a tornado watch/warning situation in the US. The time of the phase is 11:37. Another unstable spell. This one is or should be one that produces ridges of high pressure in the UK but from where though? Nothing of the kind available hehttp://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall..htm What remains of the Siberian High is flowing away down south to be replaced by deep lows to our north. On the TV storms and snow are forecast. There appears to be a degree of uncertainty about the near future on weather discussions here. No prizes for guessing what that means. I'm surprised that there wasn't a large mag for the hurricane force winds that blew through Britain yesterday. Perhaps the occluded front aimed at Scandinavia tomorrow:http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htmwill produce the absent miscreant. Meanwhile here are the scores for those Highs leaving USA so far this spell: 6.4 * * 2008/01/10 01:37 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON 6.1 * * 2008/01/09 14:40 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION 6.4 * * 2008/01/09 08:26 WESTERN XIZANG |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 10, 9:32 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
Meanwhile here are the scores for those Highs leaving USA so far this spell: 6.4 2008/01/10 01:37 OFF THE COAST OF OREGON 6.1 2008/01/09 14:40 QUEEN CHARLOTTE ISLANDS REGION 6.4 2008/01/09 08:26 WESTERN XIZANG I think it is a pity that one has to share Usenet with idiots. I don't mind so much their idiocy but intrusion. Still, I am without peer so should be content with my abilities and rescind my deprecation of lesser mortals and their ancillaries. In the meantime, a Low Pressure system sitting on the east coast of the USA is stifling any seismic developments for the moment: http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html Which is not to say that these air pressure systems do actually fuel earthquakes and the like. It is just part and parcel of the same cause and effect -or lack thereof. There is flooding in some parts of Britain, large parts of Central East Africa (around Lakeland.) Thaws have occurred in North America and yet there is still plenty of snow in many areas there and Europe, Scotland included. Even Iraq has had some. The first time in living memory for some places there. So seeing as this drastic reaction to last week and beyond's cold weather has taken place, where is the concurrent earthquake? Unfortunately there doesn't apear anything special he http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080102 Which just leaves tornadic activity and above cloud lightning. Unless we are about to receive a visitation from the subversive gods. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 9:26 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
In the meantime, a Low Pressure system sitting on the east coast of the USA is stifling any seismic developments for the moment: http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current chart on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an high 5. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 12, 7:31 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current chart on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an high 5. Nope. Now it looks like those Highs are heading inland to the Great Lakes. Awk'd bass'ds. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 12, 11:51 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current chart on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an high 5. Now it looks like those Highs are heading inland to the Great Lakes. It seems that the highs might slough off from the Canadian border or maybe even further north. Should be interesting. Meanwhile the Scandinavian High has now become the East Siberian High and all the Low Pressure that normally feeds in from the Atlantic has been restored: http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/data/analysis/947_50.gif No occluded fronts though. I suppose that is a good thing? I wish that that last chart was a little easier to decipher. Would it cost an arm and a leg to colour the land mass? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 13, 9:28 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html Looks like there are two Mag 6 quakes pending, going by the current chart on the above link. Maybe only one will be an M 6 and one just an high 5. Now it looks like those Highs are heading inland to the Great Lakes. It seems that the highs might slough off from the Canadian border or maybe even further north. Should be interesting. This spell's tribulations were flooding in the UK and central Africa as well as tornadoes in the US and Philippines. Perhaps interesting was not the best word to use. Something mor academic in these though: 2008/01/14 5.4 01:20. SOUTH WEST INDIAN RIDGE 2008/01/13 5.3 12:15. LUZON, PHILIPPINES 5.1 11:16:36 -16.000 -173.063 10.0 TONGA 2008/01/12 5.0 22:44. INDIA-BANGLADESH BORDER REGION 5.2 10:13. KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA 5.5 08:32. SOUTH SANDWICH ISLANDS REGION 2008/01/11 5.0 04:43. SOUTH OF JAVA, INDONESIA 2008/01/10 6.3 01:37. OFF THE COAST OF OREGON http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_big.php The Oregon quake occurred on the last day that an high left the east coast of the USA. (That's as near as I can tell from the Unisys site.) If I am right, it is more circumstantial evidence that there is a direct relationship between the two phenomena. What is a problem is that the times involved don't seem to tie them in all that closely. However the Unisys charts are filled in by meteorologist working to schedules and data that is not as demanding as whatever it is in them that relates to seismic activity. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
15th Jan (19:46) So this is the last day of a most interesting spell.
Unfortunately the next one is somewhat similar, so expect very little change in the GEM and GFS charts. 11:37 is as near to noon as 19:46 is to 18:00 as damn it is to swearing. And the expected situation on this chart: http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html at these times is: A standing Low Pressure area situated somewhat to the left of the Great Lakes. With a complex set of High pressure areas trying to break through from the west. And I know what you are all thinking... "Why don't the two of them get together and blow each other out?" And the answer is: Because if they did that then the weather in the troposphere would be no different from the weather above the tropopause. And I know what you are all thinking now...... "Why didn't you think of that?" And the answer is: .. .. .. .. .. Because you are all a bunch of lemons. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 11, 9:26 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
So seeing as this drastic reaction to last week and beyond's cold weather has taken place, where is the concurrent earthquake? Unfortunately there doesn't appear anything special hehttp://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080102 Which just leaves tornadic activity and above cloud lightning. Unless we are about to receive a visitation from the subversive gods. I have just had a look at a Google email dated 8th January: http://www.wandtv.com/Global/story.asp?S=7590156 http://www.rrstar.com/multimedia/x531360995?pop=true http://www.wisn.com/news/14996323/detail.html http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs...ING01/80107047 http://www.kspr.com/weather/blog/13506712.html All links to stories of recent US tornadoes. On the money as usual. Good ol' Mike. 6 more from one dated the 9th, so probably more on the same lines. One or two with good pictures though: http://www.myfoxkc.com/myfox/pages/N...Y&pageId=3.2.1 http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/myfox/pa...Y&pageId=3.2.1 http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j...QsANQD8U1RJL02 http://www.wlky.com/news/15005624/detail.html http://www.rrstar.com/multimedia/x546810146?pop=true http://wkbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=7594215 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|