Some good stuff on here kudos the SanFrancisco University. I hope
someone alerts them to what the amazing Weatherlawyer is doing with
their stuff.

http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/cmoll/cmoll.html
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/c...moll_mpeg.html
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/sst/latest_sst.gif
http://squall.sfsu.edu/gif/sathts_pac_snd_00.gif
http://squall.sfsu.edu/gif/sathts_snd_00.gif
http://squall.sfsu.edu/crws/archive/sathts_arch.html
http://virga.sfsu.edu/pub/composites/sathts_snd/0701/

The thing is if you want archived sea level surface data to collate my
enthusiasms with reality you couldn't do much better than look at
their archives and compare it to the earthquake lists on he

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/regional/...historical.php

That High in the middle of the USA is on the move:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

And here's a fierce Low to match it:
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm

One small point that I may have failed to mention is that weather
forecasts tend to fail before these large mag quakes occur. So far
things are going well for the powers that be.

Of course as soon as you notice any uncertainty, it would be an idea
to eat out and sleep in a tent.

And check your insurance.

On Jan 25, 2:33 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
That High in the middle of the USA is on the move:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

And here's a fierce Low to match it:
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm

Looks like it will be an hurricane on Sunday:
http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/warnings/sh1308.gif

It never rains but it rains something chronic. Notice the
international nature of these things. I wonder if there is a danger of
wild fires in California again.

On Jan 25, 11:51 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 25, 2:33 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

That High in the middle of the USA is on the move:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

And here's a fierce Low to match it:
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm

Looks like it will be an hurricane on Sunday:
http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/warnings/sh1308.gif

It never rains but it rains something chronic. Notice the
international nature of these things. I wonder if there is a danger of
wild fires in California again.

Ah well back to the drawing board.

That high did disappear from the USA but Canada seems to be holding on
to it for some reason. It's dodging its fate off Labrador.

Meanwhile off Madagasgar, Fame is now a cat 2 storm and not that far
away Gula is a cat 1.

So much for my Cat 7+ earthquake.
http://www.gdacs.org/cyclones/
I should have realised when the official weather forecasts were on
the ball. Usually met men and women confess to a measure of
uncertainty when there is very large magnitude quake due.
It's a foolproof indicator.

So what is going on off Canada? It is rare, as far as I know, to have
an anticyclone where a Low should be.

Or is it?
Unless they are a particular of concurrent activity for hurricanes in
the SW Indian Ocean, this sort of thing must occur about 100 times an
year.

On Jan 27, 5:20 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:51 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Jan 25, 2:33 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

That High in the middle of the USA is on the move:
http://weather.unisys.com/images/sat_sfc_map_loop.html

And here's a fierce Low to match it:
http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm

Looks like it will be an hurricane on Sunday:
http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/warnings/sh1308.gif

It never rains but it rains something chronic. Notice the
international nature of these things. I wonder if there is a danger of
wild fires in California again.

Ah well back to the drawing board.

That high did disappear from the USA but Canada seems to be holding on
to it for some reason. It's dodging its fate off Labrador.

Meanwhile off Madagasgar, Fame is now a cat 2 storm and not that far
away Gula is a cat 1.

So much for my Cat 7+ earthquake.
http://www.gdacs.org/cyclones/
I should have realised when the official weather forecasts were on
the ball. Usually met men and women confess to a measure of
uncertainty when there is very large magnitude quake due.
It's a foolproof indicator.

So what is going on off Canada? It is rare, as far as I know, to have
an anticyclone where a Low should be.

Or is it?
Unless they are a particular of concurrent activity for hurricanes in
the SW Indian Ocean, this sort of thing must occur about 100 times an
year.

Interesting harmonic with the quake in the Gulf of Guayaquil:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/.../10/280_-5.php

It is 60 degrees from where that High I was writing about in this
weeks spell, disappearewd of the screen at:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_big.php

Both North American sites are some 60 degrees from the Alaskan
Penninsula and Unimak Island. An Eureka moment?

Sadly no, Eureka is 60 degrees from the Gulf of Guyaquil. Unimak
Island is more your 90 degrees sort of a way.

Still; never mind, eh?

On Jan 27, 9:09 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://205.85.40.22/jtwc/warnings/sh1308.gif

That high disappeared from the USA but Canada seems to be holding on
to it for some reason. It's dodging its fate off Labrador.

Meanwhile off Madagascar, Fame is now a cat 2 storm and not that far
away Gula is a cat 1.

http://www.gdacs.org/cyclones/

So what is going on off Canada? It is rare, as far as I know, to have
an anticyclone where a Low should be.

Or is it?
Unless they are a particular of concurrent activity for hurricanes in
the SW Indian Ocean, this sort of thing must occur about 100 times an
year.

Interesting harmonic with the quake in the Gulf of Guayaquil:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/.../10/280_-5.php

It is 60 degrees from where that High disappeared off the screen at:
http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...quakes_big.php

Both North American sites are some 60 degrees from the Alaskan
Peninsula and Unimak Island.

120 degrees from where Fame went ashore at Mahajanga, Madagascar.

Well not quite. Boston (about half way between Cape Hatteras and
Halifax, Newfoundland) is about 120 degrees distant. Though Halifax is
120 degrees from the part of the Seychelles ridge at the centre of the
storm called Gula.

Just a coincidence?
Maybe.
But I don't think so.

Once is circumstance, twice is coincidence but if it happens all the
time, there has to be a reason.

Take for example the unnamed storm near Suva, Fiji. Would it surprise
you to read that it is 120 degrees from both Halifax and Mahajanga?

The eastern wind, when it will blow,
No small rain comes down.
An High over Cape Breton
And St John's, Newfoundland.

When the western wind blows ashore.
Across the North Atlantic
And brings a wide occluded front
Ahh!
I hate to sound pedantic but take a look at the storm centre for 23rd/
25th December 2004 he
http://www.wetterzentrale.de/topkarten/tkfaxbraar.htm

Banda Atjeh is 90 degrees from it and some 120 from NewFoundland.

On Jan 28, 4:47 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

The eastern wind, when it will blow,
No small rain comes down.
An High over Cape Breton
And St John's, Newfoundland.

When the western wind blows ashore.
Across the North Atlantic
And brings a wide occluded front
Ahh!
I hate to sound pedantic but take a look at the storm centre for 23rd/
25th December 2004 he
http://www.wetterzentrale.de/topkarten/tkfaxbraar.htm

Banda Atjeh is 90 degrees from it and some 120 from Newfoundland.

But I digress.

Sunday was a peach in the UK. Absolutely splendid. How much better can
it get without blowing all the southern seas to the four winds?

On Jan 28, 4:51 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

Sunday was a peach in the UK. Absolutely splendid. How much better can
it get without blowing all the southern seas to the four winds?

Thinking about the stratification of the Highs in the Atlantic at the
moment got me wondering just how much of the algorithm involved in the
lunar ephemeris is based on the actual quarters.

And if I am being gulled by the geophysical forces going on as for
example here at the moment:
http://www.hurricanezone.net/

In a few days time this phase: 30 Jan; 05:03, should usher in a
suitable High of its own.
http://sunearth.gsfc.nasa.gov/eclips...se2001gmt.html

Only if there are several large tropical storms in action, things will
not turn out that way.

Watch this space:
http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/ensem...me=00&Type=pnm

http://meteonet.nl/aktueel/brackall.htm