| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
February 28th 08, 08:05 PM
posted to sci.geo.earthquakes,alt.talk.weather
|
|||
|
|||
02:18
On Feb 28, 8:49 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
29th February to 7th March 2008. The spell is: 02:18 and gives way to one of anticyclonic nature (17:14.) That "14" worries me as it makes the whole following spell unstable. But that's not the worst bit. I don't have the vaguest what the 02:18 spell has in store. And as if the hour wasn't bad enough, it is followed by the worst number of minutes imaginable. "18" urgh! So. Tornadoes and derechos. Best I can do: The harmonic, the nearest expression I can get to an holistic ideal for seismicity and the weather is somewhere between what will be visible meteorologically with for example; the sort of stuff you'd see with thunderstorms and with old fashioned heavy rain sans the thunder. So in Britain I think that equates to marked striations and flash floods. There is of course no way of providing an analogy for seismicity. That science is virtually non existent. And when I look at the input from the idiots on sci.geo.earthquakes, I can see it isn't going far fast, either. Forgot to cross post again. |
Threaded Mode
