Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 5, 6:37 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
This morning a Cat 4 tropical storm appeared over Japan. No warnings from any agency I saw. Bloody fool I am, I was actually looking here and didn't see it: 5.1 M. 2008/05/05. 00:27. Near the east coast of Honshu, Japan. 5.8 M. 2008/05/03. 19:02. Bougainville region, PNG. |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
5.3 M. 2008/05/06. 23:28 -7.9 123.2 Banda Sea
5.3 M. 2008/05/06. 12:42 -20.4 168.8 Loyalty Islands 5.1 M. 2008/05/06. 10:06 -20.3 168.8 Loyalty Islands 5.3 M. 2008/05/05. 21:58 28.4 54.1 Southern Iran If you take the matched pair out of this equation you get a lapse of over 24 hours for the next pair: 06. 23:28 -7.9 123.2 Banda Sea 05. 21:58 28.4 54.1 Southern Iran And a storm in the west (Asian) Pacific: http://www.hurricanezone.net/tcgraphics/wp0308.gif No hurricane yet (it is classed as a gale on the Beaufort Scale) it will frow more powerful or the earthquake I said would arrive some days ago is at last going to avail itself for our edification. One more axiom for clueless: When the classical methods of weather-forecasting show arror or uncertainty and there is something of the same ilk with my efforts then the likelihood (the North Atlantic having a positive NAO (According to my way of classifying said anomaly. (Not that I think it is anomalous, in the true meaning of the word.))) |