On May 15, 6:54*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On May 15, 4:43 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:





In article
,

*Weatherlawyer wrote:
On May 15, 10:41 am, Jim wrote:

So, essentially, you're predicting an earthquake 'at some point' in a region
that gets several 'quakes a day?

Yes.
You are quick of the mark, you are, so you are, to be sure.

Hey, I predict a car is going to drive up my street. Soon.

Any moment now.

Oh, it's in the lull between the morning rush and lunch.

Oh! A car! A car! I predicted it!

Now predict the big ones.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The chorus of questions gets louder. You missed the big ones, W and
the 6.5 earthquake prediction "at some point", when; "I don't know"
can only be described as laughable. I'll give you a week, eh? That's
generous, wouldn't you agree?

Time, surely, to give it up, if what you are doing is this lame and no
use to anyone except to give odd pleasure to you?

On 15 May, 19:18, Dawlish wrote:




The chorus of questions gets louder. You missed the big ones, W and
the 6.5 earthquake prediction "at some point", when; "I don't know"
can only be described as laughable. I'll give you a week, eh? That's
generous, wouldn't you agree?

Time, surely, to give it up, if what you are doing is this lame and no
use to anyone except to give odd pleasure to you?

There does seem to have been rather a lot of earthquakes in the
California region recently. Most of them are relatively minor, but
anyone want to hazard a guess if the San Fransisco 'big one' is
brewing?

I wonder what synoptic situation is needed in advance of this event?

Now, a correct 7-day prediction of the San Andreas faultline making a
large move would be worth the Nobel Prize, I reckon.