alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) (alt.talk.weather) A general forum for discussion of the weather.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old June 5th 08, 01:56 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 19:23

On Jun 5, 2:42*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jun 4, 9:46*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Jun 4, 12:59*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


3rd June 2008.
5.8 M. 22:04. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.6 M. 21:03. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.9 M. 17:31. 8.2 S. 120.3 E. Flores region, Indonesia.


Some 40 degrees from the place Nakri was breathing its last though
moving some 19 knots NE when last reported (at 31.7 N. 141.9 E.)


So it's not that one. Not 120 degrees from Honduras either.


Could it be Flores?
LEWOTOBI Flores Island (Indonesia) 8.542°S, 122.775°E; summit elev.
1703 m.

More where that came from:

http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080528


I can not make any of the other possibilities fit. They are ALL
mutiples of 40 degrees on their respective great circles.

That's not the answer I am looking for. What sort of harmonic is that?
360/40, does go though. Sod it! I'm off to bed.



This lot should get worse:


IL * * *MARION
IL * * *SCOTT
IL * * *SCOTT
VA * * *CHESTERFIELD
IL * * *SCOTT
IN * * *UNION
IL * * *PIKE
IL * * *MONTGOMERY
IN * * *DECATUR
IL * * *GREENE
IN * * *JOHNSON
OH * * *ATHENS
IN * * *JOHNSON
MO * * *LINCOLN
OH * * *ATHENS
IN * * *RUSH
IL * * *GREENE
OH * * *HAMILTON


That's yesterday's US tornadix. There should be more of them and more
damage from them too, today and/or tomorrow. But I won't find out till
tomorra or ve day arftah, not being of that ex-colononic peristuation.


Let's just check this:
VA * * *CITY OF FALLS CHU
MD * * *CALVERT
VA * * *FAIRFAX
CO * * *WASHINGTON
CO * * *YUMA
CO * * *ADAMS
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *CHASE
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *CHASE
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MONTGOMERY
IA * * *UNION
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *BUTLER
NE * * *POLK
CO * * *YUMA
NE * * *BUTLER
IN * * *JASPER
NE * * *BUTLER
IL * * *MCLEAN
IL * * *LIVINGSTON
NE * * *SEWARD
NE * * *BUTLER

That's 8 more isn't it? Morte cume.


That's half as much again isn't it? Pretty nearly. And on only a part
of a day gap in the seismic disturbance. Now that's a singularity!

Diamond bright, the skies at night burst apart with celestial light
and call the name of their creator. All this he said and poetry too.

I am far too good a god for you.


And that is why he is you see. To be or not to be toby.

  #12   Report Post  
Old June 5th 08, 09:33 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 19:23

On Jun 5, 2:56*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jun 5, 2:42*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:



On Jun 4, 9:46*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:


On Jun 4, 12:59*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


3rd June 2008.
5.8 M. 22:04. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.6 M. 21:03. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.9 M. 17:31. 8.2 S. 120.3 E. Flores region, Indonesia.


Some 40 degrees from the place Nakri was breathing its last though
moving some 19 knots NE when last reported (at 31.7 N. 141.9 E.)


So it's not that one. Not 120 degrees from Honduras either.


Could it be Flores?
LEWOTOBI Flores Island (Indonesia) 8.542°S, 122.775°E; summit elev.
1703 m.


More where that came from:


http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080528


I can not make any of the other possibilities fit. They are ALL
mutiples of 40 degrees on their respective great circles.


That's not the answer I am looking for. What sort of harmonic is that?
360/40, does go though. Sod it! I'm off to bed.


This lot should get worse:


IL * * *MARION
IL * * *SCOTT
IL * * *SCOTT
VA * * *CHESTERFIELD
IL * * *SCOTT
IN * * *UNION
IL * * *PIKE
IL * * *MONTGOMERY
IN * * *DECATUR
IL * * *GREENE
IN * * *JOHNSON
OH * * *ATHENS
IN * * *JOHNSON
MO * * *LINCOLN
OH * * *ATHENS
IN * * *RUSH
IL * * *GREENE
OH * * *HAMILTON


That's yesterday's US tornadix. There should be more of them and more
damage from them too, today and/or tomorrow. But I won't find out till
tomorra or ve day arftah, not being of that ex-colononic peristuation.


Let's just check this:
VA * * *CITY OF FALLS CHU
MD * * *CALVERT
VA * * *FAIRFAX
CO * * *WASHINGTON
CO * * *YUMA
CO * * *ADAMS
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *CHASE
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *CHASE
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MONTGOMERY
IA * * *UNION
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *BUTLER
NE * * *POLK
CO * * *YUMA
NE * * *BUTLER
IN * * *JASPER
NE * * *BUTLER
IL * * *MCLEAN
IL * * *LIVINGSTON
NE * * *SEWARD
NE * * *BUTLER


That's 8 more isn't it? Morte cume.


That's half as much again isn't it? Pretty nearly. And on only a part
of a day gap in the seismic disturbance. Now that's a singularity!

Diamond bright, the skies at night burst apart with celestial light
and call the name of their creator. All this he said and poetry too.


I am far too good a god for you.


And that is why he is you see. To be or not to be toby.


I snaffled this from Metcheck:
From To Usual Weather

1 Jun 4 Jun The first wave of the 'European Summer Monsoon' as low
pressure moves in from the West bringing cooler weather and heavy slow
moving showers.

10 Jun 14 Jun The second wave of the 'European Summer Monsoon'
bringing more wet and windy weather, between the periods expect better
weather as the Azores high begins to expand.

18 Jun 27 Jun The third and final wave of the 'European Summer
Monsoon' brings more wet and windy weather to the UK with further
heavy showers.

10 Jul 22 Jul A traditional warm period for the UK, the first of the
'Phew, whatta scorcher!' headlines hits the press as the Azores high
builds and extends over the UK.

23 Jul 27 Jul Spanish plumes and stagnant areas of low pressure are
very common during this period bringing heavy thunderstorms.

31 Jul 8 Aug Again, a potentially thundery period of the year but this
is the period where the hottest day of the year is likely to occur.

16 Aug 30 Aug Summer starts to fade as the first of the Autumn storms
arrives bringing cooler, unsettled weather to many areas, high
pressure may hang on in the South for a while longer.

1 Sep 17 Sep The 'Old Wives Summer' begins as high pressure crosses
the UK en route to Siberia bringing a period of 3 or 4 fine days
followed by showers.

18 Sep 24 Sep The Atlantic starts to return more Autumn storms during
this period, the period around 23rd/24th is liable to gales.

5 Oct 12 Oct Again, a wet and windy period of the year bringing more
Autumn gales to the UK.

16 Oct 20 Oct A traditionally settled period as high pressure builds
and crosses the UK.

24 Oct 13 Nov This period is known as the 'Autumn Rains or Continental
Trains' as the period starts wet and windy with gales from 26th-29th
however high pressure sometimes builds from the East on the 30th.

14 Nov 24 Nov A traditionally settled period as high pressure settles
over the UK bringing quiet, foggy weather to the UK.

25 Nov 10 Dec A wet and windy period of the year usually as cyclonic
systems move in from the Atlantic, the two most stormy periods are
25th - 29th November and 6th - 12th December.

18 Dec 24 Dec The pre-Christmas period brings the winter solstice and
also a traditionally quiet and frosty period of the year as high
pressure dominates the weather. Gales still possible in Northern
areas.

25 Dec 31 Dec One of the most traditional periods of the year where in
many years the Atlantic brings gales and heavy rain/sleet or snow back
to the UK during the festive week.

5 Jan 17 Jan A traditionally wet and windy period of the year as the
Atlantic begins to become more active, however storm systems affect
mainly western areas.

18 Jan 24 Jan Dry and frosty as high pressure begins to affect the UK,
Easterly winds are quite common during this time.

24 Jan 3 Feb This period is notorious for gales and severe gales to
affect the UK with snowfall a high risk to many areas.

8 Feb 16 Feb This period usually sees the years highest frequency of
high pressure across the UK and is usually the coldest period of the
year. A good period to head off to the Alps for some ski-ing

21 Feb 25 Feb A 'Northerly Blast' is quite common during this period
as low pressure crosses the UK and snowfall affects many areas.

26 Feb 9 Mar A stormy and cool period usually dominates this period
bringing occasional Northerly outbreaks followed by wet and windy
weather as storms move in from the Atlantic and settle over Norway.

10 Mar 22 Mar A settled period as the first of the Spring
anticyclonesaffects the UK. As daylight hours are longer this period
can sometimes see very mild weather during the day but hard frosts at
night.

23 Mar 31 Mar March usually ends on a stormy note and starts the first
of the 4 Northerly Spells which last through April and into early May
bringing the traditional showers.

10 Apr 19 Apr This is probably the most relaible of the Northerly
showery outbreaks for the entire year. Low pressure to the East brings
cold showers to many areas with snow possible in Scotland.

23 Apr 16 May Again, a cool period usually, however the Atlantic
starts to quieten down and winds from the North or East are very
common whilst Westerlies are rare.

17 May 31 May This period is known as the fore-monsoon, traditionally
dry and warm with high pressure over the UK and continent.

1 Jun 4 Jun The first wave of the 'European Summer Monsoon' as low
pressure moves in from the West bringing cooler weather and heavy slow
moving showers.

http://www.metcheck.com/V40/UK/FREE/singularities.asp

If they don't like me posting it to Usenet I will remove it. Let's
hope they don't see it.

The thrust is that these must be averages composed primarily of the
solar declination. The averages for the lunar declines are going to
spread it all out a lot more democratically.

They are an undertone in the planetary harmonic composed by the Three
Body Problem. A beat, you might call it.

When the lunar declination superimposes on these beats to couple or
synergise, the effect should be a marked on.

When it is opposed to it, the effect will disappear somewhat. Of
course with harmonics the opposition might also act as a couple. You'd
have to know something about acoustics to get that point though.
  #13   Report Post  
Old June 5th 08, 12:13 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default Standing in Mid Heaven.

On Jun 5, 10:33*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

http://www.metcheck.com/V40/UK/FREE/singularities.asp

The thrust is that these must be averages composed primarily of the
solar declination. The averages for the lunar declines are going to
spread it all out a lot more democratically.

When the lunar declination superimposes on these beats to couple or
synergise, the effect should be a marked one.


Here is a description of the maximum declinations of the sun -North
and South:
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/New...3?img_id=17130


All of the globe is the same distance from the sun on average. So one
might expect that in summer the earth would be super-hot and in winter
-cold at the poles. But though it does get cold (minus 40 and more
occasionally) it could get a lot worse if it were not for the
atmosphere and perhaps the harmonic vibes.

The moon and earth are an induction motor. And induction motors
produce heat. They have internal harmonics too. Presumably the gist of
this principle is that the earth doesn't get too cold because of this
harmonic?

Otherwise occasional cycles would ensure the natural flow of heat in
the blanket of atmosphere would (occasionally) not flow to the poles.

Some weather patterns would be set up to take heat out of the poles -
even in winter. And that would take things down to lunar temperatures
there. But that doesn't happen. The earth is a net exporter of heat.

More heat leaves earth than arrives at it. This has been known for
decades. I will go so far as to say that all planets with satellites
have this phenomenon. Those with satellites in captured rotation,
certainly.

So now all we have to do is get the declinations of the other angles
in the Metcheck link above. Easy:

http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/TYPE/sun2.html#su2006


It's virtually the same every year. To within the parameters that
those "points of dwell" indicate, at any rate. But there are a few
years to choose from up to 2006 if you need to check. (Something I
tend to neglect to do.)

Just change the number of the end of the link. The declination is the
column next to the RA or Right Ascension. The minus sign indicates the
degree below the equator. The positive numbers are the declines above
it.

Which just leaves the lunar tables to find. These change every year,
so 2006's tables are no use to forecasters, no matter how useful to
archival experts seeking proof.

So I won't be doing much of that back-casting.

It's never been my intention to blow my own trumpet. But diligent
students of the Great Weatherlawyer can see for themselves that I am,
of course, right once again.

Here are the lunar declinations for 2008:
http://www.michaelmandeville.com/ear...ry_2006-08.txt


He has more stuff on there and some of it quite interesting. I haven't
read it myself yet so can't recommend anything.
  #14   Report Post  
Old June 5th 08, 01:53 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 19:23

On Jun 5, 2:42*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jun 4, 9:46*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

On Jun 4, 12:59*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


3rd June 2008.
5.8 M. 22:04. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.6 M. 21:03. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.9 M. 17:31. 8.2 S. 120.3 E. Flores region, Indonesia.


Some 40 degrees from the place Nakri was breathing its last though
moving some 19 knots NE when last reported (at 31.7 N. 141.9 E.)


So it's not that one. Not 120 degrees from Honduras either.


Could it be Flores?
LEWOTOBI Flores Island (Indonesia) 8.542°S, 122.775°E; summit elev.
1703 m.

More where that came from:

http://www.volcano.si.edu/reports/us...rweek=20080528


I can not make any of the other possibilities fit. They are ALL
mutiples of 40 degrees on their respective great circles.

That's not the answer I am looking for. What sort of harmonic is that?
360/40, does go though. Sod it! I'm off to bed.



This lot should get worse:


IL * * *MARION
IL * * *SCOTT
IL * * *SCOTT
VA * * *CHESTERFIELD
IL * * *SCOTT
IN * * *UNION
IL * * *PIKE
IL * * *MONTGOMERY
IN * * *DECATUR
IL * * *GREENE
IN * * *JOHNSON
OH * * *ATHENS
IN * * *JOHNSON
MO * * *LINCOLN
OH * * *ATHENS
IN * * *RUSH
IL * * *GREENE
OH * * *HAMILTON


That's yesterday's US tornadix. There should be more of them and more
damage from them too, today and/or tomorrow. But I won't find out till
tomorra or ve day arftah, not being of that ex-colononic peristuation.


Let's just check this:
VA * * *CITY OF FALLS CHU
MD * * *CALVERT
VA * * *FAIRFAX
CO * * *WASHINGTON
CO * * *YUMA
CO * * *ADAMS
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *CHASE
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *CHASE
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MONTGOMERY
IA * * *UNION
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MILLS
IA * * *MILLS
NE * * *BUTLER
NE * * *POLK
CO * * *YUMA
NE * * *BUTLER
IN * * *JASPER
NE * * *BUTLER
IL * * *MCLEAN
IL * * *LIVINGSTON
NE * * *SEWARD
NE * * *BUTLER


Updated to 46:

VA CITY OF FALLS CHU
MD CALVERT
VA FAIRFAX
CO WASHINGTON
CO YUMA
CO ADAMS
NE HOWARD
IA MILLS
NE CHASE
NE CHASE
IA MILLS
NE CHASE
IA MILLS
IA MONTGOMERY
IA MILLS
MD CHARLES
IA UNION
IA MILLS
IA MILLS
IA MILLS
NE BUTLER
NE POLK
CO YUMA
NE BUTLER
IN JASPER
NE BUTLER
IL MCLEAN
IL LIVINGSTON
NE SEWARD
NE BUTLER
IA ADAMS
IL TAZEWELL
NE BUTLER
IL LIVINGSTON
IL TAZEWELL
IL WOODFORD
IA ADAMS
IA UNION
IA UNION
IA UNION
IA UNION
IA CLARKE
IA CLARKE
NE GOSPER
NE PHELPS
NE GOSPER
NE BUFFALO

  #15   Report Post  
Old June 6th 08, 01:59 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,777
Default 19:23

5th June preliminary:

CO PROWERS
KS LOGAN
KS LOGAN
KS PRATT
KS GOVE
KS GOVE
KS TREGO
NE HOLT
NE HOLT
KS CLAY
KS CLAY
KS CLAY
KS WASHINGTON
SD CHARLES MIX
NE NEMAHA
NE NEMAHA
MO ATCHISON
IA FREMONT
NE OTOE
IA FREMONT
MO ATCHISON
KS BROWN
NE RICHARDSON
NE RICHARDSON
MO HOLT
MO HOLT
MO ATCHISON
IA CASS

28 of them.

And I have closure for them too. Every storm cell has it's signature
couplet on this site:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...uakes_all.html

So I am either the lunatic others claim I am, or I am the genius that
sorts these things out. Which?

Either I get drowned by the democratic poetry that six thousand
million people less one, are right. Or we go with the truth and
convert all the non-believers.

Somehow, I rather think that the stone I have been given to look at
will wend its way back to the sea shore without me. But at least I
tried.

Look at how many Muslims died because the Roman Catholic Church was
unwilling to accede to the suggestion that the earth goes around the
sun.

It's a funny old world isn't it?


  #16   Report Post  
Old June 6th 08, 08:22 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default 19:23

On Jun 6, 2:59*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:
5th June preliminary:

CO * * *PROWERS
KS * * *LOGAN
KS * * *LOGAN
KS * * *PRATT
KS * * *GOVE
KS * * *GOVE
KS * * *TREGO
NE * * *HOLT
NE * * *HOLT
KS * * *CLAY
KS * * *CLAY
KS * * *CLAY
KS * * *WASHINGTON
SD * * *CHARLES MIX
NE * * *NEMAHA
NE * * *NEMAHA
MO * * *ATCHISON
IA * * *FREMONT
NE * * *OTOE
IA * * *FREMONT
MO * * *ATCHISON
KS * * *BROWN
NE * * *RICHARDSON
NE * * *RICHARDSON
MO * * *HOLT
MO * * *HOLT
MO * * *ATCHISON
IA * * *CASS

28 of them.


Revised to 35:

CO PROWERS
KS LOGAN
KS LOGAN
KS PRATT
KS GOVE
KS GOVE
KS TREGO
NE HOLT
NE HOLT
KS CLAY
KS CLAY
KS CLAY
KS WASHINGTON
SD CHARLES MIX
NE NEMAHA
NE NEMAHA
MO ATCHISON
IA FREMONT
NE OTOE
IA FREMONT
MO ATCHISON
KS BROWN
NE RICHARDSON
NE RICHARDSON
NE RICHARDSON
MO HOLT
MO HOLT
MO ATCHISON
SD MINNEHAHA
IA CASS
SD MINNEHAHA
IA UNION
IA UNION
IA JASPER
IA JASPER

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/climo/reports/080605_rpts.html

And I have closure for them too. Every storm cell has it's signature
couplet on this site:

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/...uakes_all.html


The trouble with signatures is that they are user specific without
necessarily being readable. Perhaps I may possibly have been a little
previous in my declaration earlier.

Or not, as the case may be.

Interesting stuff though.
  #17   Report Post  
Old June 6th 08, 08:48 AM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes,uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default A most singular singularity extends in two oceans?

On Jun 4, 5:46*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jun 4, 12:47*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:



On Jun 4, 12:59*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:


3rd June 2008.
5.8 M. 22:04. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.6 M. 21:03. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.9 M. 17:31. 8.2 S. 120.3 E. Flores region, Indonesia.


Some 40 degrees from the place Nakri was breathing its last though
moving some 19 knots NE when last reported (at 31.7 N. 141.9 E.)


So it's not that one. Not 120 degrees from Honduras either.


Rotten to the core. The reasoned, educated and accomplished theory on
singularities and the abuse of weather-lore in computer modeling comes
unstuck again with this spell.


With the almost close similarity of the last two spells ending as this
wet spell ensues, the threat of a major earth-quake again hangs over
the planet. (I thought I'd better mention the location for the duffers
-though it appears one of them has given up on me at last.)


We are about to see the flaccid 1016 mb isobar spread its softening
net over the oceans that really matter:


https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/efs/cgi-b...t=0&incr=12&st...)
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/efs/cgi-b...t=0&incr=12&st...)


I would like to advise all my fans to watch out.


OTOH, it might turn out to be a blow:
5.1 M. * * * * *2008/06/04 01:25 * * * * Sulawesi, Indonesia.

An hurricane would be... vindicative. Not necessarily nice.


SItuation negative.

Large pools of northern ocean between three continents are covered
with unconfrontational weather. I don't know the official term but
blocking high and extensive blah ... just don't cover it.

Such is not the case in North America where a series of cells has
swept the country with this spell. Not that there was a great deal of
peace there in recent ones.

It is just that in a negative oscillation like this, the output such
as it is is fractured. The planet is owed one large magnitude quake
and the North Atlantic is a series of high Lows and low Highs..

All over Africa, Asia and parts of Europe, there is sign of famine.

Behold a dark horse.
I don't have a great deal of confidence that world rulers are going to
sort this one out. They are not exactly bursting with that je nais se
quoi.

More your sort of Jenny says quit.
  #18   Report Post  
Old June 6th 08, 04:33 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes,uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default A most singular singularity extends in two oceans?

On Jun 4, 12:47*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jun 4, 12:59*am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

3rd June 2008.
5.8 M. 22:04. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.6 M. 21:03. 8.1 S. 120.2 E. Flores region, Indonesia.
5.9 M. 17:31. 8.2 S. 120.3 E. Flores region, Indonesia.


Some 40 degrees from the place Nakri was breathing its last though
moving some 19 knots NE when last reported (at 31.7 N. 141.9 E.)


So it's not that one. Not 120 degrees from Honduras either.


Rotten to the core. The reasoned, educated and accomplished theory on
singularities and the abuse of weather-lore in computer modeling comes
unstuck again with this spell.

With the almost close similarity of the last two spells ending as this
wet spell ensues, the threat of a major earth-quake again hangs over
the planet. (I thought I'd better mention the location for the duffers
-though it appears one of them has given up on me at last.)

We are about to see the flaccid 1016 mb isobar spread its softening
net over the oceans that really matter:

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/efs/cgi-b...t=0&incr=12&st....)
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/efs/cgi-b...t=0&incr=12&st....)


I would like to advise all my fans to watch out. You have been warned
and now you are on your own. Let's see if your gods or a bigger monkey
will save you.


The threat of a major earthquake hangs over this planet every single
day of our lives. We are in complete agreement on that one, as would
every scientist working in the field and everyone who knows anything
about earthquakes.

The problem everyone has is forecasting it. so, go on: if you are
somehow saying that a major earthquake is due, forecast it. Magnitude
and timeframe at least. To forecast the area would be remarkable and
you'd have people taking notice of you theories. Without perameters, a
forecast is not a forecast. Then come back and evaluate your forecast.

Remember you missed the last major earthquake, in Sichuan, completely.
  #19   Report Post  
Old June 6th 08, 06:13 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes,uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default A most singular singularity extends in two oceans?

On Jun 6, 5:33*pm, Dawlish wrote:

Remember you missed the last major earthquake, in Sichuan, completely.


You really do learn very slowly don't you. There is madness in your
method. Something somewhat deplorable in those who claim some measure
of a grasp.

But don't let me start you.

  #20   Report Post  
Old June 6th 08, 07:24 PM posted to alt.talk.weather,sci.geo.earthquakes,uk.sci.weather
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Mar 2008
Posts: 10,601
Default A most singular singularity extends in two oceans?

On Jun 6, 7:13*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:
On Jun 6, 5:33*pm, Dawlish wrote:



Remember you missed the last major earthquake, in Sichuan, completely.


You really do learn very slowly don't you. There is madness in your
method. Something somewhat deplorable in those who claim some measure
of a grasp.

But don't let me start you.


People who won't forecast with measurable perameters, like yourself,
are simply not believable. you are at 25% since April 24th. I, and
others, are awaining your next forecast. Indulge us.

Forecast us an earthquake/hurricane/volcanic eruption with measurable
perameters to judge it by, or stop vacillating. Every Earth scientist
says what you have just said all the time. The threat of a major
earthquake hangs over this planet every day of our lives. We all know
that. You are implying something will happen soon. So forecast it,
temporally, magnitudinally and areally. Not much to ask. It's easy.
The difficult bit, as you well know, is getting the forecast right.

If you can't do that, your writings are as useless as the man who
stands on the street corner with the placard saying "The End of the
World is Nigh". Most people don't believe him either.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017