42.

On Jun 30, 1:08*pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

42

Or, if you like a little more detail with everything:
For two.

Weatherlawyer wrote in news:a8f111a0-4503-4414-
:

42.

What do you get when you multiply six by nine?

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

On Jun 30, 7:30 pm, Skywise wrote:
Weatherlawyer wrote in news:a8f111a0-4503-4414-
:

42.

What do you get when you multiply six by nine?

Me being Math Blind?

I have answers you can only dream about. They are written in my brain.
All I need are a couple of mice. And a decent cup of tea.

Or a really parthetic robot.
Soon.

I have a mattress stuffed with leaves already. I just need someone to
invent one so I can buy it.

So, nobody wants to talk about the 7 Mag., heh? Issa hokay.
7.0 2008/06/30 06:17:43 -58.169 -22.014 10.0 SOUTH SANDWICH
ISLANDS REGION

I talka boudit on myself. Issa hokay.

7.7 2008/07/05 02:12:05 53.892 152.884 633.3 SEA OF OKHOTSK

On Jun 30, 1:13 pm, Weatherlawyer wrote:

42

Or, if you like a little more detail with everything:
For two.

What is the first law of human relations?

Or if you like; the difference between analogue and digital?

When does a system become continuous? Or a threat become systemic; an
infestation say, or a disease?

Once is chance. Twice is coincidence and thrice is a continuum.

It is the first law of war:
War cannot be said to have started anywhere, it is more a continuation
of political resolutions that went wrong a long time before the
protagonists became involved.

Not can the conspiratorial find a suitable place to start the pointing
of fingers in the WTC affair.

When was building 7 prepared for collapse for example?

When the landlord failed to find tenants? When Salomon Brothers moved
in?
There were indeed many extraordinary coincidenta involved.

Either they were just a gamut of bizarre coincidences or they were
carefully controlled hush up exercises. Not many governments have
succeeded in covert activity very well, very long.

And the Chimpanzee has had a run of incompetence that beggars belief.
Could someone that never finished My Pet Goat manage that? He couldn't
manage toilet training never mind flight school.

There again; who better to control than the missing link?

So where are the seismic records from September the eleventh 2001?

Did they go the same way as the steel from Building 7?

On Jul 5, 7:34 am, Weatherlawyer wrote:

7.7 2008/07/05 02:12:05 53.892 152.884 633.3 SEA OF OKHOTSK

666 is a man's number. I wonder if the Babylonians knew about
Stochastic accountancy in their climb to the North Star. It is smack
dab in the region where Navier Stokes equations break down.

Look at the pretty picture on he
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/research/rg_gfd.php

Notice anything Newtonian about it?

"Kähler Geometry and Fluid Mechanics

From slowly-evolving large-scale fluid flows, such as those observed
in the atmosphere and oceans, to rapidly changing and turbulent flows,
fluid mechanics is believed to be described accurately by the
classical Navier--Stokes-based equations of motion.

[This got me wondering if there is a relationship with the profile of
a tornado and the column of air that spherical geometry would
determine the angles for, on the surface level pressure charts'
vortices.]

Detailed computations of the three-dimensional incompressible Navier--
Stokes equations vividly illustrate the fact that vorticity has a
tendency to accumulate on quasi one-dimensional tubes or filaments and
on quasi two-dimensional sheets.

[Boy! I am just about holding onto the language, never mind the
mathematical concepts. A problem exacerbated by terms such as:
"singularity". They don't cross over very well. (Or do they?)]

On larger scales (such as in the atmosphere and oceans) and in the
symptotic regimes that are most relevant for weather and climate
forecasting, it can be shown that the solutions of the fluid equations
stay close over finite but useful, time intervals to the solutions of
much simpler dynamical systems.

[Size is not a major concern in quantum leaps. Navier Stokes' stuff
breaks down with intensity. In fact it models identically with all the
earth sciences.

At 666.]

These approximate models seek to describe flows in which there is a
dominant balance between the Coriolis, buoyancy and pressure-gradient
forces on fluid particles, which can be described very succinctly
using vortex dynamics.

[well there's your problem identified straight away. Mixing metaphors
and facts.]

Recent research suggests that ideas from Kähler geometry may be
important in understanding the principles that govern the vortex
dynamics of both the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations and the
equations that govern those regimes most important to weather and
climate.

[OTOH if it means what I think I think I think, the answer is eluding
those who can not see it is a "Band" phenomenon.]

The use of different sets of dependent and independent variables in
geophysical models of cyclones and fronts, has facilitated some
remarkable simplifications of otherwise hopelessly difficult nonlinear
problems.

[They are only hopeless to those who don't know the answer but then
again, if we all had what we want we wouldn't go shopping, would we?
(Those of us of the non female persuasion at least.)]

Quaternionic [a quantity or operator expressed as the sum of a real
number and three complex numbers, equivalent to the quotient [the
result of division; the number of times one quantity is contained in
another] of two vectors.

The field of quaternions is not commutative [it doesn't follow
commutative mathagoround] under multiplication.] and hyper-Kähler
structures emerge in models of nearly geostrophic [of or pertaining to
the balance between the Coriolis force and the horizontal pressure
force in the atmosphere] flows in atmosphere and ocean dynamics, and
it has also been shown that the three-dimensional Euler equations has
a quaternionic structure in the dependent variables.

[I believe I have explained elsewhere that the principle of the so
called Coriolis effect is found in all drains where the pressure
attains enough velocity to reach circular escapement.

(Pressure in the core being equal and opposite in all outward
directions, the free fall flowing allows the ingress of air through
the toroid.]

Our current research is focused on Kähler, and generalised Calabi-Yau,
structures in the incompressible Navier--Stokes equations in two and
three dimensions."

[It aught to indulge us with a nod in the direction of the campaign
for clear English too.]

I just came across a write-up of stuff Einstein came up with. A lot of
interesting stuff and some of it worth considering today too -if only
to make corrections.

I wrote it all out so that anyone can play with it. It beats me that
in this day and age scientific works are still being sent out as PDF.

For goodness sake. This is the century of the fruit-bat!:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgx44d4z_8x7p8h2b

The threads in sci.geo.earthquakes at the moment are all lost causes
concerning much of this sort of thing:

"Geodynamics:
Geodynamics is the study of the processes and mechanisms that shape
and have shaped, our planet in the past, from the longest to the
shortest length and time-scales: from plate motions to microscopic
crystal deformation and magma migration, and from millions of years to
minutes.

Einstein’s scientific considerations on this topic are principally
connected to crustal geodynamics and are expounded in a series of
correspondences in the mid 1950's with Charles Hapgood (courtesy of
the Einstein Archives Online:
http://www.alberteinstein.info/.

Hapgood (1958) developed a controversial theory called Earth Crust
Displacement (ECD), according to which the earth’s lithosphere can
sometimes move as an whole over the asthenosphere.

The proposed mechanism for these crustal displacements is related to
the build-up of thick ice-sheets in Polar and near-Polar regions. This
idea is a global geological theory which, in conjunction with many
other anomalies of earth science, attempts in a sophisticated (but
also controversial) (Martínez-FríasandBarrera 2000) way to elucidate
how and why large parts of Antarctica could have remained ice-free
until recently.

Hapgood claimed that towards the end of the last ice-age, the
widespread mass of glacial ice covering the northern continents
provoked the lithosphere to “slip” over the asthenosphere, moving
Antarctica, for several centuries, from a location in the middle
latitudes to its current position and, in unison, rotating the other
continents.

Antarctica’s movement to the Polar region precipitated the growth of
its ice-cap. Similarly, by shifting the northern ice sheets out of the
Arctic zone, the end of the ice age was made possible. Support for
this theory was given by Einstein:"

I suppose I'll have to look up something of the subject, if only to
find out why the ice was not more a subject of centrifugal force than
the asthenosphere.

I suppose I aught to. And...

Who knows, I might.