Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is what I see:
A hurricane that looks weak on satellite photos. No CDO. The storm is starting to move over cool waters. Dry air is encroaching from the west. It may be only a wobble, but the storm may want to move more north... meaning more cold water to deal with before landfall. Smartly, NWS Morehead City, which is in the model's bullseye, is forecasting only 65 mph sustained winds with higher gusts. Possible results? Isabel only a tropical storm or weak hurricane at landfall, but with a large wind field. Wind damage, however, will be light. The only dangers will be storm surge, inland flooding, and damage to mobile homes. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Curvaceous or Bust? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
2007 Hurrican activty a BUST [2nd year in a row] | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
we can bust apart Hurricanes with this AirConditioner coolant of | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Beeb radar - bust again | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
great isabel bust of 2003? | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) |