Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.environment Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
February 1, 2004 Brian Sandle wrote: Though my correlation of greater than 0.4 with Shuttle flights traces loss of ozone within three years of the flights. Address that. The SRB contribution to things like ozone depletion and global warming, while not exactly 'insignificant', are quite small. Rather than obsessing on it, notice that the solution to the problem is trivial. Don't use SRBs. They have lots of other problems anyways, in addition to being dirty. Low ISP, rough burning, little or no throttling, high failure rate, etc... Elifrtiz's article (on google not on my posting server) gives three https, but scanning them for km gives nothing at the 100s of kms where the Shuttle injects HCl. That is because the SRBs don't inject pollutants at that altitude, they barely make it above 50 km. OK well it does not give anything there either, I think. They aren't my articles, you can google them yourself, there are dozens like those. If you google in far enough, you'll see that the Shuttle SRBs do make honorable mention in global climate models, but that is about the extent of it, and only at flight rates that were never achieved in practice. My suggestion is to use the Delta IV medium, but then watch out, they'll jump all over you about the evil hydrogen atom, and that nasty wasser stuff. This is a great big little rocket, I just don't understand why everyone is practically ignoring it. Try http://www.dhmo.org (veracity not implied) If it does some damage that someone has to pay to look into I guess it will get accepted. The way economics works big oil spills stimulate the economies of the countries whose coasts they pollute. Lots of money is spent in the area. Are there not companies making a large profit out of bad climate? And if a species of some creatures or other becomes scarce because of lack of ozone/excess UV, then someone will jump in to make a profit out of the scarcity. The way space technologists are treating the atmosphere is parallel to uneducated indigenous peoples being exploited to supply ivory from elephants. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Mars like robots to SpaceStation to replenish ozone layer Ice-dust +ozone replenishment as 2 solutions run in tandem to solve global | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Stratospheric Ozone Loss | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
NH ozone loss | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Arctic Ozone Loss More Sensitive to Climate Change Than Thought | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |