sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old February 5th 04, 10:15 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.environment,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2004
Posts: 45
Default Shuttle filghts correlated to ozone loss

In sci.environment Thomas Lee Elifritz wrote:
February 1, 2004


Brian Sandle wrote:


Though my correlation of greater than 0.4 with Shuttle flights
traces loss of ozone within three years of the flights. Address
that.


The SRB contribution to things like ozone depletion and global warming, while not exactly 'insignificant', are quite small. Rather than obsessing on it, notice that the solution to the problem is trivial. Don't use SRBs. They
have lots of other problems anyways, in addition to being dirty. Low ISP, rough burning, little or no throttling, high failure rate, etc...


Elifrtiz's article (on google not on my posting server) gives three
https, but scanning them for km gives nothing at the 100s of
kms where the Shuttle injects HCl.


That is because the SRBs don't inject pollutants at that altitude, they barely make it above 50 km.


OK well it does not give anything there either, I think.

They aren't my articles, you can google them yourself, there are dozens like those. If you google in far enough, you'll see that the Shuttle SRBs do make honorable mention in global climate models, but that is about the extent
of it, and only at flight rates that were never achieved in practice.


My suggestion is to use the Delta IV medium, but then watch out, they'll jump all over you about the evil hydrogen atom, and that nasty wasser stuff. This is a great big little rocket, I just don't understand why everyone is
practically ignoring it.


Try http://www.dhmo.org (veracity not implied)



If it does some damage that someone has to pay to look into I guess it will
get accepted.

The way economics works big oil spills stimulate the economies of the
countries whose coasts they pollute. Lots of money is spent in the area.

Are there not companies making a large profit out of bad climate?

And if a species of some creatures or other becomes scarce because of lack of
ozone/excess UV, then someone will jump in to make a profit out of the
scarcity. The way space technologists are treating the atmosphere is parallel
to uneducated indigenous peoples being exploited to supply ivory from
elephants.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NASA: Environmental disaster avoided on ozone loss Roger Coppock sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 15 March 22nd 09 06:26 AM
Mars like robots to SpaceStation to replenish ozone layer Ice-dust +ozone replenishment as 2 solutions run in tandem to solve global Archimedes Plutonium sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 2 March 26th 05 08:02 AM
Stratospheric Ozone Loss Martin Crozier uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 16 March 13th 05 01:02 AM
NH ozone loss Waghorn uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 March 2nd 05 10:12 AM
Arctic Ozone Loss More Sensitive to Climate Change Than Thought Ron sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 April 26th 04 06:32 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017