Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could someone here please tell me if there is any scientific relationship
between "motion of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field (earth's)" and the dynamics of a hurricane and a tornado? I am not speaking of the Coriolis effect. See: http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/physics/mag/node3.html Thank you for your help Bill -- http://home.earthlink.net/~billbernice1/ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article et,
Bill Orr wrote: Could someone here please tell me if there is any scientific relationship between "motion of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field (earth's)" and the dynamics of a hurricane and a tornado? I am not speaking of the Coriolis effect. See: http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/physics/mag/node3.html The page is true enough, but all it does is describe the Lorentz force. In order to apply to the atmosphere at any significant degree, a significant part of the atmosphere would have to be charged. It isn't. The Lorentz force is an important consideration only in the ionosphere, over 100 km up. For the troposphere, the lowest 10 km, including where we are, it's negligable. Hmm. Interesting thing. The magnetic field points in the same direction (South Magnetic pole to North Magnetic pole) everywhere. B is, then, aiming in pretty much the same direction whether you're at 45 North or 45 South. Given that, if the magnetic field _were_ important, then storms should rotate in the same direction for both hemispheres. While toilets and kitchen sinks don't reliably show the effect, storms do, and it's to rotate in opposite directions in the two hemispheres. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Grumbine" wrote in message ... In article et, Bill Orr wrote: Could someone here please tell me if there is any scientific relationship between "motion of a charged particle in a uniform magnetic field (earth's)" and the dynamics of a hurricane and a tornado? I am not speaking of the Coriolis effect. See: http://theory.uwinnipeg.ca/physics/mag/node3.html The page is true enough, but all it does is describe the Lorentz force. In order to apply to the atmosphere at any significant degree, a significant part of the atmosphere would have to be charged. It isn't. The Lorentz force is an important consideration only in the ionosphere, over 100 km up. For the troposphere, the lowest 10 km, including where we are, it's negligable. Hmm. Interesting thing. The magnetic field points in the same direction (South Magnetic pole to North Magnetic pole) everywhere. B is, then, aiming in pretty much the same direction whether you're at 45 North or 45 South. Given that, if the magnetic field _were_ important, then storms should rotate in the same direction for both hemispheres. While toilets and kitchen sinks don't reliably show the effect, storms do, and it's to rotate in opposite directions in the two hemispheres. -- Robert Grumbine http://www.radix.net/~bobg/ Science faqs and amateur activities notes and links. Sagredo (Galileo Galilei) "You present these recondite matters with too much evidence and ease; this great facility makes them less appreciated than they would be had they been presented in a more abstruse manner." Two New Sciences Bill Orr says: Thank you, Robert. You provided the information I wanted. There are still many unknown questions concerning hurricanes and tornadoes. and cloud electrification. Science still has a ways to go but they will get there for isn't that what science is all about. Cheers Bill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GW is not sunspots, solar cycle length, solar magnetic field, cosmic rays, or solar irradiance. | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Captain Cook helps understand earth's magnetic field,article link | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
aurora & losing magnetic field | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Charged Particle in Magnetic field | ne.weather.moderated (US North East Weather) | |||
Lightning electric field vs magnetic field? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |