Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MEDIA RELATIONS OFFICE
JET PROPULSION LABORATORY CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION PASADENA, CALIF. 91109 TELEPHONE (818) 354-5011 http://www.jpl.nasa.gov Feature March 10, 2005 A Tale of Two El Ninos "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.." The same event can have dramatically different outcomes. For some, an El Nino means a welcome respite from bitter winter weather. For others, it can bring lashing rains and devastating floods. All El Ninos don't run the same course either. Though the El Nino of 2002-03 affected climate around the world, it was much milder than the unusually large El Nino of 1997-98. What made one so much stronger than the other? University of Maryland researcher Eric Hackert and three colleagues at the university's Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center took a close look at these two El Ninos to find out. Using satellite data of ocean temperature and sea-surface height along with computer models, they analyzed the two events to determine how they were alike and, more importantly, how they were different. One of the things they discovered was that a particular kind of wave helped make one El Nino much stronger and longer lasting than the other. Hackert and his colleagues first studied how the two events began to see if something in their initial states might have foreshadowed the difference in their ultimate intensity. "In many respects they started the same," says Hackert. "With these initial conditions, the prediction for both of these scenarios would have been for mild events." The striking differences between the two El Ninos became evident after the winds, what scientists call forcing, came into play. Winds drive ocean currents and excite waves. In an El Nino, a breakdown in the easterly (east to west) trade wind system spawns two different kinds of waves: Kelvin waves and Rossby waves. Kelvin waves travel from west to east along the equator. Rossby waves move in the opposite direction from east to west on either side of the equator. These waves create a change in ocean circulation. When Hackert and his colleagues dissected ocean height satellite data to isolate the individual effects of the Kelvin and Rossby waves, they began to see differences in how the two El Ninos developed. They found that the Kelvin wave component for the two El Ninos was similar at first but then strengthened for the 1997 El Nino and weakened for the 2002 El Nino. Even more striking was the influence of the Rossby waves. They had little effect on the development of the 2002 El Nino but made a large contribution to the strength and duration of the 1997 El Nino. "Rossby waves alone contributed up to half of the sea surface temperature signal in the central Pacific during the key period of the build-up of the 1997 event and served to sustain the warm temperatures during the spring of 1998 in the far eastern Pacific," says Hackert. "One-third of the total sea level signal-the seesaw effect with sea level down in west and up in the east--is accounted for by Rossby waves." "Our study is the first time that anyone has actually broken the components into Kelvin and Rossby waves and done data assimilation to try to separate the role of the two," says Hackert. "It is an example of how satellite data in combination with numerical ocean models can be used to investigate theories on how an El Nino develops." For their study, Hackert and his colleagues used sea-surface temperature data from National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration satellites and sea-surface height measurements from the Topex/Poseiden and Jason satellites, joint missions of NASA and the French space agency. "This was just one step toward improving our understanding of how an El Nino works and what makes the atmosphere and the ocean couple to create a strong event," Hackert says. Media contact: Alan Buis (818) 354-0474 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"baalke" wrote in message
oups.com All El Ninos don't run the same course too, neither. Though the El Nino of 2002-03 affected climate around the world, it was much milder than the unusually large El Nino of 1997-98. What made one so much stronger than the other? Might one hazard a guess that the sea ice in the Arctic was greater for the latter? (I.E. the former.) "In many respects they started the same," Well, they would wouldn't they! The striking differences between the two El Ninos became evident after wind.... forcing, came into play. The Kelvin wave component for the two El Ninos was similar at first but then strengthened for the 1997 El Nino and weakened for the 2002 El Nino. But if there is a relationship with sea ice in the Antarctic the Kelvin Wave component drops off as the sea ice increases? The Kelvin wave is an inverse constant? Even more striking was the influence of the Rossby waves. They had little effect on the development of the 2002 El Nino but made a large contribution to the strength and duration of the 1997 El Nino. I'm a little flumoxed he If the sea ice is extensive is the Rossby wave more evident? If so how is it instrumental -or is it just a symptom? The alledged Kelvin wave has a heat input potential being at or near sea level. (If you believe that you will believe anything: http://www.oc.nps.navy.mil/webmodules/ENSO/kelvin.html) "Rossby waves alone contributed up to half of the sea surface temperature "One-third of the total sea level signal -the seesaw effect with sea level down in west and up in the east -is accounted for by Rossby waves." If you believe that you will believe everything: http://www.soc.soton.ac.uk/JRD/SAT/R...ssbyintro.html "...at mid-latitudes (say, 30 degrees N or S) one such wave may take several months - or even years - to cross the Pacific Ocean." "Our study is the first time that anyone has actually broken the components into Kelvin and Rossby waves and done data assimilation to try to separate the role of the two," says Hackert. One wonders why. "It is an example of how satellite data in combination with numerical ocean models can be used to investigate theories on how an El Nino develops." Is it... er.. I mean it.. er... is? "This was just one step toward improving our understanding of how an El Nino works and what makes the atmosphere and the ocean couple to create a strong event," The only question one can come up with is?: How many steps will it take in the right direction to .. ..... well.. you know.. ................................................li ke the obvious ... .................................................. .........................................like? -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tale of two cities | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
A Tale of Two Forcasters | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
A tale of two snow events | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Climategate and a Tale of Two Georges | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
A Tale of Two Weathers | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |