Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the spotlight. If you can see my posts, they range from totally
coherent, scientific and thoughful (see above), to the ludicrous/sarcastic (bordering Mr. Moriarty fame). The type of post you receive is based on the sensefulness and relevance of the original post. Do I think you toot your own employer's horn to much? You bet! And why? Just once I want to hear 5 reasons why someone would WANT to work there, because from numerous 1st person dealings, there is a strong desire to leave despite being held captive by Bubba the jail master. Companies that treat their employees well (through pay, work environment, duty hours, etc...) don't have contracts because they don't have turnover (especially in such an awesome city as SCE). End of discussion. wrote in message ups.com... EdM wrote: wrote in news:1112107667.081738.294380 @l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: Fortunately, I recieved better and more intelligent advice elsewhere... that figures, of course: It is indeed fortunate that you received legitimate responses to such a belligerent and ill conceived post. No one is arguing that freezing fog was likely the result of a proper manual augmentation. But your cries will fall upon deaf ears unless you refine your approach. The fact that several people gave you that advice and your response was to imply that they are wrong because they are posting here tells me that you just don't get it. I've always written your loose-cannon approach off to youthful exhuberence, but if you don't get over it soon, it will turn into something that will create life-long difficulties for you. This is the last time (I think) that I will risk a flaming by counseling you against self-inflicting wounds. Its your life, but an open mind will save you from a lot of future grief. My point was not simply regarding posts like this one, but to the state of this place in general... for example, here is the list of the most recent topics as listed on Google Groups: Lazy FAA Observer at Trenton-Mercer Airport Bartlo thinks Jackson is sexy [ Pest posts, March 12-26 Is it time for ****seph Blerto's psest lits, yet? NOMINATION - Vito Kuhn for 72 Raisins "Crackpot Religion" Award (Fwd) Norm Nowrecki - Kookology - And The Sands Of Time Another one of my predictions FOAM WARNING Barlo Blows Billygoats 6th Annual NE.Wx Snowfall Forecast Contest #8 - The Forecasts digest, volume 2453447 Killington, VT Change of Seasons Major East coast event tomm BARTLO M E L T D O W N UPDATE Weekend Reading Life support Forecast Contest? Pictures from State College, from yesterday and this morning Petrus -your PC date is one day ahead it WAS all about oil! The BIG Winners... For once, NOT a New England storm... AccuWeather Channel the furure= future JB Wins Over DT? NO!!! Coastal next week? Where is Bartlo? A ? for Mike Moriarty: Ann Arbor's Snowiest? Amarillo ; Calling out Dr Harvie.... Dignity I mean, for Pete's sake, half the topics are ridiculous... Then, we come to what has been increasingly annoying about this place... attacks. For example: I posted the AccuWeather Channel news release. No, not to make Joel happy or whatever you sick pathetic losers here think, but because I thought SOME of you might just be a little interested. Instead, MeatyUrologist makes one of the most insulting responses I have ever read, for NO reason except perhaps the fact that he is actually a NWS employee who hates us as much as SOME (not all) at AccuWeather hate him. Another one... I make a post bemoaning the lack of snow State College is receiving compared to normal and compared to my home town, and MeatyUrologist pops in again with "How much icing would it take to collapse the fortress on Science Park road? Worker's Comp!!!"... I could even mention the "blizzard condition" debates... TQ was the star in those, of course... The fact of the matter is that this is a deplorable place to discuss anything. Only reason I still post here at all is to annoy the hell out of those who would rather see me leave....there are certainly better places to discuss the weather on the 'net. ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In any case, it appears many of your colleagues in the NWS have seen my
posting here as an attack on the NWS... which it certainly is NOT. ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... [boorish termper tantrum snipped] I could even mention the "blizzard condition" debates... TQ was the star in those, of course... Ray, you ignorant slut. A debate is where fact-based arguments are presented in defense of opposing opinions. Your opinion about what constitutes blizzard conditions had no basis in fact b/c you relied on notoriously unreliable sources -- WFO web pages -- to support your position. When presented with hard, verifiable facts from unrefutable sources, your arrogance and hubris prevented you from admitting your error. Instead, you continued to defend your position by invoking blizzard 'warning' criterion for vsby (=1/4 SM), which is different than the observed vsby criterion ( 1/4SM). Tsk-tsk-tsk. As a 'professional meteorologist,' you should know the definitions and the difference between the two if you expect to have any credibility when discussing this phenomenon. If you don/t know the difference and want to maintain any semblence of integrity, then you should admit as much, thank those who showed you the error of your ways, and stop having hissy-fits in public. Love, TQ PS - Your reaction to this FAA bu**** is none too surprising when you consider the how 'Ray Martin' easily transforms into 'AIR MY RANT!' |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gentlemen,
I apologize for my previous statements regarding deception. However, I still maintain that, at least at the time I specified, the ASOS at KTTN was not accurately portraying the weather at the airport, based on nearby observations, evidence from the issued observation from KTTN, radar imagery, and information from several family members who live within 2 miles of the airport. I think that perhaps, a change in reporting practice from the ASOS would be helpful for the user and observer. For example, when the ASOS is standalone (AUTO), the following distress codes are issued at the end of the observation during an instance such as what occured on March 8: SNEMM PWINO FZRANO However, when the ASOS is in augmentation mode, the PWINO FZRANO are not included, with only the SNEMM indicating a problem with the sensors. This is also the case with other sensor distress codes, such as TSNO. I believe it would be in everyone's interests if this was changed so that, even while the ASOS is being augmented, the sensor error codes were displayed. This would alert the augmentor that there are problems with the unit severely affecting performance requiring augmentation, while alerting the end-user to be more skeptical of the observation. ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in
oups.com: I'm sorry, but you are just plain lying. Are you really going to tell me that this radar was completely wrong and no precipitation was falling at the time???? http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/da...0Z-08Mar05.gif This is a constant problem from KTTN, observations which are NEVER corrected. You guys do absolutely no work, in regards to augmentation. I'm gonna be honest with you, I'm actually a meteorologist from the area and pay close attention to the KTTN observations all the time, especialy during snow, and they are NEVER augmented at all. I've seen so many times when the precip sensor failed and all that was reported was freezing fog, when it was clearly snowing moderatley to heavily. You make me sick, sir. ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ Yeah, this'll get results. How childish. |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sandy A. Nicolaysen wrote:
Raymond: Arguing with James is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still a retard. Let it go. - Sandy in Princeton You may be right, but I still had to try... ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MeatyUrologist wrote:
Way to stand behind that Accu Weather name Raymond!! Sure the boss appreciates your dialogue, which actually could have made great strides had you passed English 15 at Penn State. Unfortunately, Mr. Holier Than Thou (that's you) comes off with a complete lack of tact, decency, and respect plus an attitude that befits a foul tempered 14 year old. You honestly got sick over an unaugmented weather observation? I'm beginning to think you're achieving kook status! You think you made TTN look bad? Think again. That dialogue is a total embarassment to none other than yourself. I'm surpried Mr. Pate gave you the curteous reply that he did! Quite frankly, you deserve to have sausages shoved down your throat and starving dogs up your butt. You are very disgusting and perverted. And why would you be surprised at Pate's courteous reply? Up until then (which was, again, clearly a BS'ing reply), I was also courteous. ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary M wrote:
MeatyUrologist wrote: It's unfortunate because you attempted to call attention to a long standing problem since the FAA took over observations, but the manner in which you have done so certainly won't win you any friends on either side of the playing field. Maybe you ought to stick to desk work which doesn't involve any communication with other human beings, or at least take a few classes in communications because you really are hurting yourself. Office Space anyone? Not to mention that it's **** poor to post a personal email exchange, and even worse to leave the guy's phone number in there. I doubt there are any good intentions on Raymond's part. He comes off as a obsessive kook. No, I come off as a taxpayer who's peeved at the lack of quality I'm getting for my mone. ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
EdM wrote:
wrote: Another one... I make a post bemoaning the lack of snow State College is receiving compared to normal and compared to my home town, and MeatyUrologist pops in again with "How much icing would it take to collapse the fortress on Science Park road? Worker's Comp!!!"... **************** Actually, that was pretty funny. I recently saw George Hamilton (older actor, hair always in place, rediculously dark tan, etc...) making fun of himself and his tanning/grooming habits, etc. He has been the target of ridicule for those traits in the past, but comes off as maybe just being a decent guy anyway because he is willing to have a little fun instead of getting defensive and ****ed off. This might be a good model for you to consider. The fortress on Science Park road sounds like an inside joke, which strikes me as more of an attempt to bond...or at least heal wounds, than as an attempt to harm you. You need to work on your sense of humor. **************** I bet if I made a joke like that about the NWS, I wouldn't generate anywhere near the kind of amusement from others as you suggest was generated by MeatyUrologist's comment. ===== Raymond C. Martin, Jr. Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/ New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/ Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Trenton, New Jersey Climatology Website is now online ;) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Trenton NJ record high and low temp duplications | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Belfort Instrument Company DigiWx AWOS - Have any been commissioned by the FAA - And if so, for how long will that last? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Belfort Instrument Company DigiWx AWOS - Have any been commissioned by the FAA - And if so, for how long will that last? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Weather observer required for film shoots | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |