TQ wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...
[boorish termper tantrum snipped]

I could even mention the "blizzard condition" debates... TQ was
the
star in those, of course...

Ray, you ignorant slut. A debate is where fact-based arguments are
presented in defense of opposing opinions.

Your opinion about what constitutes blizzard conditions had no basis
in fact
b/c you relied on notoriously unreliable sources -- WFO web pages --
to
support your position. When presented with hard, verifiable facts
from
unrefutable sources, your arrogance and hubris prevented you from
admitting
your error. Instead, you continued to defend your position by
invoking
blizzard 'warning' criterion for vsby (=1/4 SM), which is different
than
the observed vsby criterion ( 1/4SM).

Tsk-tsk-tsk. As a 'professional meteorologist,' you should know the
definitions and the difference between the two if you expect to have
any
credibility when discussing this phenomenon. If you don/t know the
difference and want to maintain any semblence of integrity, then you
should
admit as much, thank those who showed you the error of your ways, and
stop
having hissy-fits in public.

Love,
TQ

PS - Your reaction to this FAA bu**** is none too surprising when you
consider the how 'Ray Martin' easily transforms into 'AIR MY RANT!'

Only one response is appropriate here...


















































LOL LMAO

=====
Raymond C. Martin, Jr.
Associate Meteorologist, AccuWeather Inc.- http://www.accuweather.com/
New Jersey Expressways and Tollways - http://www.njfreeways.com/
Ray's Winter Storm Archive - http://www.njfreeways.com/weather/