Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
James, it so hard to tell what you are rambling about, but let me be
perfectly clear for you and anybody else; My interest in separating government/university forecasts from private forecasts is entirely for value-added products. Government (NWS) and universities can forecast the wind, forecast the temperature, forecast clouds, forecast the precipitation/type, but apart from life and limb forecast, stay away from producing "results" for commercial endeavors! I have no interest in producing a wind product for the Indian Ocean. If there is some commercial application of such a forecast, and where a private company is/can do it, it should be left to them. I do have considerable expertise in producing heating and cooling demand forecast for the U.S. with regional and national population-weighted values, calculated each business day. NWS had a tame, once-per-week version of that long ago and that was okay. However, more recently they began a daily product as well, and then they have added some derivatives to their otherwise generic 6- to 10-day product too; that I will contend, oversteps their bounds. I'm more than willing to go head-to-head with NWS or a university or any other private company on a generic 6- to 10-day (which I also do), but the public funded folks should stay out of the "commercial" results/value-added portion. I have considerable expertise in producing soil moisture products and other soil condition derivatives. NWS has gradually encroached on that arena too. I still believe my product to be superior to theirs (and to other privates' I have seen) especially as it relates to agriculture, but it is a hard sell when a potential customer can get something mediocre from NWS or a university for free vs. paying a modest price for the very best. My day-to-day efforts in deriving my soil products would be so much easier if NWS (and their little buddies at the FAA) would just concentrate on telling me how much precipitation has occurred! If they would do their jobs they have been given, they would have some much time on their hands to dream up ways of cutting my (and my fellow private meteorologists') throat(s). David Salmon |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
National Weather Service - Online School for Weather | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
National Weather Service? | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
The National Weather Service and Aviation: Working Together Since the First Flight | Latest News | |||
Comment on Strategic Plan for NOAA's National Weather Service | Latest News | |||
NOAA's National Weather Service Hosts Severe Weather and Wildfire Awareness Week In Pacific Northwest | Latest News |