sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 22nd 05, 12:19 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.geo.earthquakes,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Dec 2004
Posts: 4,411
Default Just when you thought you knew all there was to know about simple physics.


Hartin explains that humans have been "putting the wet stuff on the red
stuff" for centuries, without really analyzing the effects. What's been
overlooked is the fact that the invisible gases produced in a fire can
be much more dangerous than any flame.

Especially in enclosed spaces, these gases tend to become superheated,
flammable, and highly mobile.

The result: backdrafts, flashovers, and gas explosions - the three main
varieties of so-called extreme fire behavior. Every year, scores of
firefighters around the world die because they've been trained to deal
with this volatile mix of physics and fire gases by using an
old-fashioned strategy: duck.

Hartin thinks it's time for a change. He's the first fire chief in the
US to embrace a tactic known as 3-D firefighting - 3-D because it takes
into account the gases that fill a room, not just the surfaces of the
structure on fire.

Using thermal-imaging equipment, firefighters gauge the thermodynamics
of a blaze and then attack both the seen and unseen elements using
split-second pulses of fog. In Sweden and Britain, where it is now part
of the official firefighting method, 3-D has led to a more than 50
percent drop in fatalities caused by extreme fire behavior.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/1...ght&topic_set=

  #2   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 02:30 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.geo.earthquakes,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Default Just when you thought you knew all there was to know about simple physics.

They should do that with EQ prone and past know areas too.

  #3   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 03:51 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.geo.earthquakes,sci.geo.meteorology
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by Weather-Banter: Jan 2006
Posts: 11
Default Just when you thought you knew all there was to know about simple physics.

On 23 Jun 2005 19:30:13 -0700, "The Psychedelic Pope"
wrote:

They should do that with EQ prone and past know areas too.


Do what?

************* DAVE HATUNEN ) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Just thought I'd just remind you:- Dave Cornwell[_4_] uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 8 November 1st 14 05:03 PM
Simple Question from a Simple Man. Lawrence Jenkins uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 0 December 4th 10 11:38 AM
Simple Calculations For The Physics of Global Warming Are TotallyInadequate wbbrdr sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 September 22nd 08 08:10 AM
Simple Calculations For The Physics of Global Warming Are TotallyInadequate wbbrdr sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) 0 September 22nd 08 08:01 AM
Just when you thought it was all over.. Phil Layton uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) 2 December 27th 04 03:38 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 Weather Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Weather"

 

Copyright © 2017