Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() James Toupin wrote: (snipped) While I am not a professional scientist, I do have a "scientific mind", as you put it. I have not forgotten volcanic ash or meteoric ash and dust as an agent in cooling the atmosphere. However, volcanic ash or dust ejected by the impact of a meteorite is not at all similar to "aluminums sequins". Both volcanic ash and impact debris does not so much reflect solar radiation away from the earth as simply blocking the radiation from striking the surface, particularly in the visible and infrared wavelengths. And, oddly enough, while it cools the earth by blocking sunlight from reaching the earth's surface, it also acts as a thermal blanket trapping whatever heat is generated by the planet and it's life processes thus keeping the temperature from droping as dramatically as it would otherwise. Sorry to say, but you lack a scientific mind when you do not realize that an analogy of factual data disprove your argument. You admit that volcanic dust cools Earth. You admit that meteoric ash cools Earth. But then your unscientific mind refuses to believe that Aluminum Aluminium Sequin would magnify by powers of 10 the cooling of Volcanic/Meteoric ash would cool. You admit volcanic ash cools Earth, so why do you refuse to accept that a Aluminium Sequin particle would cool Earth by perhaps 10^9 greater than a volcanic ash particle. Unless you are arguing just to be arguing. Actually, there is not even a need to invoke the examples of volcanic and meteoric activity, as this is a fairly well known principle to meteorologists and a mater of common sense that , I imagine, even grade school children have perceived. An overcast day is cooler than a clear one, while a clear night is cooler than an overcast one. This is because, during the night the earth radiates heat energy, in the form of infrared radiation, back into space reducing the temperature. The cloud cover stops the heat from being radiated away and traps the heat in the atmosphere. In the region of the Equator where the Gulf Sea lies there are a density number of incoming photons from the Sun and likewise for this density number of a given cross section of space there is a number of photons outgoing from the Earth which is very very small compared to incoming Sun photons. Aluminium Sequin will reflect a very small, very tiny number of outgoing photons from the Earth surface back to the Earth surface. But the number of reflected incoming Sun photons is so huge that to speak of Aluminium Sequin as a blanket to warm Earth is so ridiculous and that is why I called you lacking of a science mind. Think about what is the proportion of reflected Sun rays by Earth compared to the number of incoming Sun rays. The reflection of the "Sun rays" - very scientific - is not the issue. The issue is how much solar radiation, particularly in the infrared wavelength is absorbed by earth's ocean and how much heat, generated by that radiation striking the earth, is allowed to escape back into space. It is a precarious balancing act and one that has already been affected by the release of carbon-dioxide into the atmosphere through industrial processes. This carbon-dioxide produces the very "thermal blanket" effect that I have already cited above, which traps the heat in earth's atmosphere that would normally be radiated out into space. What makes you think that Aluminum/Aluminium Sequin does not reflect or absorb infrared wavelength and thus preventing those photons from heating up the oceans. What makes you think that since volcanic ash and meteoric ash can absorb the infrared that the Aluminium does or does not absorb the infrared. And what makes you think that Aluminum does or does not reflect infrared wavelengths. So what is your scientific source for your denial of aluminum as absorbing or reflecting? As for aligning the sequin, I do not need to do that. Aluminum sequin is the lowest tech for a Earth Air Conditioner and will be the first such engineering. But after it is in orbit, there is no doubt in my mind that future engineers will make it higher tech with the ability to perhaps align the particles. Perhaps the lowest tech solution would be to simply release dust into the upper atmosphere, or low earth orbit, rather than using reflective aluminum sequins at all. This would not even require the refining process needed to produce aluminum, simply dig up a mound of dirt somewhere. Of course there is still the nasty business of unintended consequences: how would the rest of the climate be effected by the change you purpose? The Gulf Stream and the Global Conveyer are integral to balancing the heat exchange between the middle and lower latitudes. No need for dust when Aluminum by a factor of 10^9 does a better job of cooling Earth. There maybe a plant material that may do as well of a job as aluminium sequin. The chaff of agricultural harvesting such as corn stalk chaff or cotton chaff may provide a better material. Perhaps some leaves such as the raking of Fall leaves chaff would be about 1/2 the weight per volume of aluminium sequin. Improvements to Earth Air Conditioner will go on as long as humanity exists, but what I am interested is getting the first one built, made of aluminum sequin. As I said earlier Order is happiness and the more order we have means the more controlling of Hurricanes and also controlling Earth Air Conditioner. Some future day we could perhaps control weather for most of the continental land masses. Order is not always happiness. If you need proof of that simply ask anyone who suffered at the hands of Nazism or Communism, both big believers in order. James I am afraid it is. And a sign of a nonscientific mind such as James is to constantly argue against whatever the other person says, and the inability for that mind to ever be "open minded". As for Nazism and Communism and tyrants and relition-run-states are systems of dogma, just as religion is dogma. At least in the Democratic process as a system there is room in the process to remove falsity and corruption. In dogmatic political systems such as Nazism, Communism, Religion-states, and dictator states there is little to no room to remove corruption or falsehoods and whenever you have corruption and falsehoods you have disorder. Democracy begs and pleads for order to run the country. Democracy hates an environment of corruption, an environment of disorder, an environment where the rule-of-law is not attended to. The concept of happiness and being happy are one and same as the concept of order, whether the order is in controlling hurricanes so they do not destroy your life or whether it is the happiness that your government enforces rule of law. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Have we had two months like this before in mid-winter? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
have you seen an amazing miracle like this before...!!? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Too many seals? [Was: How many major U.S. cities have now flooded?] | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Katrina Katrina Katrina Katrina | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
Wetlands destruction highly relevant to Katrina damage (was Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |