Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() James Toupin wrote: I am sure that aluminium sequins would indeed have an effect on the atmosphere at the temperature of the Earth's surface. What I don't accept is your argument that it would only reflect incoming solar radiation away from Earth and not also trap heat in like a thermal blanket. It's not that I don't accept it, rather that humanity messing with the environment has not ever turned out well before. We need to keep that in mind before we do anything to interfere with the natural processes. My argument never said all radiation is reflected into outer space, so please do not put words into my mouth. You need a lesson in physics and I need practice in lecturing about physics. Most of the Sun radiation, EM radiation that strikes Earth surface is in the visible wavelength, but I do not have a percentage of that and am guessing about 70% that strikes Earth surface is Visible Light which makes sense in that photosynthesis is based on visible range of light. The Infrared range of Sunlight seldom strikes the surface of Earth and is absorbed by the atmosphere of Earth. So the comment by James that ocean waters are heated up due to infrared radiation and the bulk of the cause of hurricanes is not true. Apparently the main contributor of the heating up of ocean waters is Visible Light. Also, Infrared region of EM spectrum reflects easily by mirrors and by aluminum sequin. The infrared telescopes in use are positioned on high level mountains that are dry mountains. It is given that aluminium reflects the Visible range of Sunlight. So by putting aluminium or aluminum sequin into orbit will easily reflect alot of Visible and Infrared radiation coming from the Sun. Now there is a small contribution of infrared radiation due to Earth itself of its radioactivity and the fact it is a body above zero kelvin temperature. All bodies above zero kelvin emit infrared radiation. And the sequin will reflect some of this outgoing infrared back to the surface. The amount of solar radiation reflected would be dependent upon: the amount of aluminium used, and the angle at which it is inclined relative to the incoming solar radiation and the surface of the Earth. If it were simply allowed to orbit randomly, the aluminium sequins, which I presume you would have polished to a high reflectivity in order to get the magnitude of order cooling that you suggest, would tumble in space and not consistently reflect radiation away from the Earth at all. By extension, if the aluminium sequins are simply allowed to tumble, why would the reflectivity not be equal when it was facing the surface of the Earth as when it was facing outward? I do not know why you are hung up on the fact of tumbling. The basic math of this reflectivity is that a huge percent of incoming Sun rays are reflected into space and a small amount of infrared that the Earth itself as a body emits is reflected back to Earth. So if 99% of the rays that are reflected are reflected into outer space, why be hung up on a mere 1% that is re-reflected back down to the Earth surface. And James is illogically hung up on rays that are reflected towards the surface of Earth, for which they would have struck Earth anyway if the aluminum was not there in the first place, so they do not count. What counts is that every reflected ray into outer space by the Aluminum will keep the Earth that much cooler. And there will be alot of these reflected rays and only a meagre rare few rays that become trapped by the aluminum. I am open minded. I am open to many ideas and possibilities. I am also open to the idea of unintended consequences. I feel that the unintended consequences of this plan outweigh any advantage that you may perceive. James I do not call that open minded. I call it "worry wart". There are those that do things to improve the world and there are worry warts that carp and banter negatives and depress those that try to improve the world. Worry warts should not have a forum to spread their depressing views. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Have we had two months like this before in mid-winter? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
have you seen an amazing miracle like this before...!!? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Too many seals? [Was: How many major U.S. cities have now flooded?] | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Katrina Katrina Katrina Katrina | alt.talk.weather (General Weather Talk) | |||
Wetlands destruction highly relevant to Katrina damage (was Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions) | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |