Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It appears that in both Katrina and Rita that a second larger storm surge
happened 12-18 hours after the eye made landfall. Obviously this happened in N.O in Katrina. Now reports are appearing from folks near Port Arthur that they returned home right after the peak winds of Rita passed yet hours thereafter a larger storm surge appeared. Is this a known effect? Is this something previously unreported? Whats happening here? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The "storm surge" as defined was not delayed and accompanied the eyewall.
What you are likely referring to is a nature of the winds around the hurricane on the eastern side. The initial northeast-east winds are blowing off-shore or parallel to the coastline at the initial onset of the surge, so there's a second pool of water back into the area that occurs when the winds shift into the south and southwest after the passage of the storm's center bringing a pile of water back into the bay. As a correction, N.O. did not have a surge 12-18 hous after the eye made landfall. Storm surge is a very specific term that coincides with a rising sea surface ahead of and in the immediate vicinity of the approaching eye. This is not to be confused with man-made disasters such as a levee failure owing to torrential rainfall and the force of winds against that barrier. Similarly in Port Arthur, the standing water did not result from surge but from intense run-off and standing water -- i.e. flooding. We tend to assume that rain guages are "catching" the intense rainfall during the intense part of a hurricane when in reality only a small portion of the rain is making it onto the surface with the rest "suspended" for the lack of a better term by being blown horizontally and upwards by 100mph+ winds and hurricane updrafts. When these winds subside, there is very typically a very drastic and mass settling of airborne water that can be shown by rapid rain gauge accumulations when doppler radar intensities would not support it. Needless to say, 6-10" of rain anywhere in the country, let alone an area with high water table and poor drainage, is going to have extensive standing flood waters develop in the 12-24 hour time frame after a hurricane. Hope this helps. "fred" wrote in message ... It appears that in both Katrina and Rita that a second larger storm surge happened 12-18 hours after the eye made landfall. Obviously this happened in N.O in Katrina. Now reports are appearing from folks near Port Arthur that they returned home right after the peak winds of Rita passed yet hours thereafter a larger storm surge appeared. Is this a known effect? Is this something previously unreported? Whats happening here? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MeatyUrologist" wrote in message ... The "storm surge" as defined was not delayed and accompanied the eyewall. What you are likely referring to is a nature of the winds around the hurricane on the eastern side. The initial northeast-east winds are blowing off-shore or parallel to the coastline at the initial onset of the surge, so there's a second pool of water back into the area that occurs when the winds shift into the south and southwest after the passage of the storm's center bringing a pile of water back into the bay. As a correction, N.O. did not have a surge 12-18 hous after the eye made landfall. Actually there are a number of credible reports to the opposite. The level of Lake Ponchetrain did rise many hours AFTER the passing of the southern edge of the eyewall. This also appears to have happened in Rita. Is this effect being ignored or previously gone unnoticed? Storm surge is a very specific term that coincides with a rising sea surface ahead of and in the immediate vicinity of the approaching eye. Exactly and that nitpick is exactly what I'm questioning. In BOTH cases a larger tidal flood occurred many hours AFTER the passing of the southern edge of the eyewall. Such makes your "specific term" seem ill-defined. This is not to be confused with man-made disasters such as a levee failure owing to torrential rainfall and the force of winds against that barrier. Similarly in Port Arthur, the standing water did not result from surge but from intense run-off and standing water -- i.e. flooding. AH, can you cite a source. The flooding in Cameron and Creole and many of the other surrounding area was NOT caused primarily by rainfall. If rainfall was a great cause of flooding then let's meter that with the flooding level in powerless sub sealevel Galveston. We tend to assume that rain guages are "catching" the intense rainfall during the intense part of a hurricane when in reality only a small portion of the rain is making it onto the surface with the rest "suspended" for the lack of a better term by being blown horizontally and upwards by 100mph+ winds and hurricane updrafts. When these winds subside, there is very typically a very drastic and mass settling of airborne water that can be shown by rapid rain gauge accumulations when doppler radar intensities would not support it. Needless to say, 6-10" of rain anywhere in the country, let alone an area with high water table and poor drainage, is going to have extensive standing flood waters develop in the 12-24 hour time frame after a hurricane. Let's see the cows as shown on TV in the area of the delayed flooding are in great distress because they are drinking rain fresh flood water....SAL****ER storm surge and upstream fresh water pushed by sal****er surge and is the issue. "fred" wrote in message ... It appears that in both Katrina and Rita that a second larger storm surge happened 12-18 hours after the eye made landfall. Obviously this happened in N.O in Katrina. Now reports are appearing from folks near Port Arthur that they returned home right after the peak winds of Rita passed yet hours thereafter a larger storm surge appeared. Is this a known effect? Is this something previously unreported? Whats happening here? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is important is to control Hurricanes, and this is possible thanks to a
easy solution I have discovered ! The rest is worthless ranting ! -- Sir Jean-Paul Turcaud Exploration Geologist Founder of the True Geology ~~ Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~ "fred" a écrit dans le message de news: ... It appears that in both Katrina and Rita that a second larger storm surge happened 12-18 hours after the eye made landfall. Obviously this happened in N.O in Katrina. Now reports are appearing from folks near Port Arthur that they returned home right after the peak winds of Rita passed yet hours thereafter a larger storm surge appeared. Is this a known effect? Is this something previously unreported? Whats happening here? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WSI update, cold delayed, but still coming | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
WSI update, cold delayed, but still coming | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Oh The Irony! Desal Plant Construction Delayed By Heavy Rain!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Spring delayed by 9 days | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
[Ship report - delayed] | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |