Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Roger Coppock wrote: You're saying that there is no mechanism. I'm saying that there isn't even a siginificant correlation. We, therefore, agree. It is not that simple Roger. The working principles for climate norms presently look similar to the creationist working principles for geological evolution and I assure you that it is that bad. Call it an enormous oversight if you will and treat it that way, but permitting a hemispherical variable axial tilting Earth to the Sun is very hard to stomach in an era which already has excellent climate data indicating global climate imbalances. http://www.scienceu.com/observatory/...s/seasons.html The mechanism or what amounts to the same thing ; the astronomical working principles , rely on an entirely different perspective which brings astronomical causes in line with the global climate data and can be reduced to hemispherical meteorological descriptions as a convenience. The Fossil Fools disagree with both of us. They're saying that global warming is all due to natural cycles. Any ex-smoker ,as I am, will tell you of the damage of dumping pollution into the lungs and the difference it makes to the body when the smoker comes to his senses and stops smoking,I imagine that smokers are more likely to recognise that global warming is a planetary response to dumping pollution into the atmosphere just as smoking generates physical imbalances in the body.Most people as they get older marvel at how the body works and do attempt to curb their behavior to allow the body to do its job but when it comes to the planet,suddenly it is a different story. I hope you see my point is framing global warming as an imbalance however there is no indication that scientists accept the astronomical cause for climate norms or balances,prefering to frame climate norms in hemispherical meteorological patterns of summer/winter (as in that website above).Even in broad outline,climate norms are every bit as intricate as the workings of the human body yet the Earth is treated in the most perverse way - http://www.scienceu.com/observatory/...s/earthyrb.gif Those who argue that global warming is due to natural cycles may seem like they know what they are talking about but I assure you that what they believe is almost as frightening as global warming itself. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Solar Variability Causes Climate Change. So does CO2 variability.So do Milankovitch cycles. So do albedo changes. Is this all too complicatedfor Deniers? | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Temperature Change And CO2 Change, A Scientific Briefing | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
Temperature sampling cycles on AWS's | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
The dreams of small children. THE DREAMS OF SMALL CHILDREN!!! | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |