Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I noticed 3 terms when forecasting a tornado warning
Hook Echo Tornado Vortex Signature Bow Echo Since all three have the potential to actually become a real tornado, does the SPC/NWS issue a warning on ALL 3 or just one of those criteria? Why not issue a warning if ANY of the three are seen? Also, if one of the three are seen, why not issue a warning for the county the feature is seen which is about to enter a county? Like if it is in Adams County right now but headed toward James county. Go ahead and issue one for James county also, just to be on the safe side? Some tornadoes last longer or even reform so why not be on the safe side? I realize this may cause some false alarms, but if people want to be silly that is not my problem because I would to each warning seriously. Please, educate me on some of this if you can. Or direct me to an appropriate newsgroup or forum on the net. thanks, bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BOB wrote:
I noticed 3 terms when forecasting a tornado warning Hook Echo Tornado Vortex Signature Bow Echo Since all three have the potential to actually become a real tornado, does the SPC/NWS issue a warning on ALL 3 or just one of those criteria? Someone correct me if I'm wrong... Hook echoes are, I believe, warned for, using the 'Radar indicated a tornado...' line in the warning. TVSs are aloft and may not have a surface reflection and aren't warned, but watched fairly closely for future evolution. Bow echoes, if long-lived, can cause derechoes that will be warned for if the wind speeds reach severe criteria. Why not issue a warning if ANY of the three are seen? Because too many false alarms means the public will start to ignore warnings. Also, if one of the three are seen, why not issue a warning for the county the feature is seen which is about to enter a county? Like if it is in Adams County right now but headed toward James county. Go ahead and issue one for James county also, just to be on the safe side? Some tornadoes last longer or even reform so why not be on the safe side? I believe this is done. There's probably a time constant involved, as in the warning for Adams county will go, and the warning for James county also if the cell will be entering James county within x minutes. But I don't know what x is. Here in WI, we'll typically see warnings for one county that expire as the county for the downstream county kicks in. But they don't issue them all at once because the cell(s) aren't in all counties all at once. I realize this may cause some false alarms, but if people want to be silly that is not my problem because I would to each warning seriously. If you are trying to save lives, it should be your problem. To warn effectively, you have to consider the psychology of being over-warned. Scott |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
GFS 06Z sig. snow on Dartmoor? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
No Sig. rain E.Dorset 22nd day | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
"Small tornado" hits Bow Street (Aberystwyth) | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Hook starting to form ? | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) | |||
Bizarre Radar "hook" | uk.sci.weather (UK Weather) |