On Mon, 01 May 2006 20:49:21 GMT,
Claudius Denk , in
wrote:
+
+ "Scott L" wrote
+
+ Um, so what *do* you mean by thermal properties of a molecule?
+
+
+ What do you think I mean?
+
+ eyeroll
+
+ If you don't want to / can't answer a question, just
+ say so.
+
+ Maybe you should look into getting a dictionary.

In which dictionary are we going to find "thermal properties of a
molecule"?

--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.

Claudius Denk wrote:
" ...one of the teachers will eventually educate you on this."

Claudius Denk

Get a tutor, indeed. You can **** on the floor but you can't "educate
on" anything.

"I R A Darth Aggie" wrote

+ Um, so what *do* you mean by thermal properties of a molecule?
+
+
+ What do you think I mean?
+
+ eyeroll
+
+ If you don't want to / can't answer a question, just
+ say so.
+
+ Maybe you should look into getting a dictionary.

In which dictionary are we going to find "thermal properties of a
molecule"?

Any and all.

On Tue, 02 May 2006 16:18:01 GMT,
Claudius Denk , in
m wrote:
+
+ "I R A Darth Aggie" wrote
+
+ + Um, so what *do* you mean by thermal properties of a molecule?
+ +
+ +
+ + What do you think I mean?
+ +
+ + eyeroll
+ +
+ + If you don't want to / can't answer a question, just
+ + say so.
+ +
+ + Maybe you should look into getting a dictionary.
+
+ In which dictionary are we going to find "thermal properties of a
+ molecule"?
+
+ Any and all.

Not any that I have. Are you talking about Brownian motion?

--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.

"I R A Darth Aggie" wrote

Not any that I have. Are you talking about Brownian motion?

Follow the thread of the same name on sci.environment

Claudius Denk wrote:
"I R A Darth Aggie" wrote


Not any that I have. Are you talking about Brownian motion?


Follow the thread of the same name on sci.environment


I'm shocked, *shocked* I tell ya, that you can't answer
a simple question.


Scott

On Tue, 02 May 2006 19:21:09 GMT,
Claudius Denk , in
m wrote:
+
+ "I R A Darth Aggie" wrote
+
+ Not any that I have. Are you talking about Brownian motion?
+
+ Follow the thread of the same name on sci.environment

Ummm...no. I'm not subscribed to that newsgroup, nor will I subscribe
to that newsgroup. In fact, I kill file postings that are crossposted
into that newsgroup.

So, I guess we're stuck. You won't provide a definition, my
dictionaries won't provide a definition, and I refuse to go to one
newsgroup that you suggest will make all clear.

I don't suppose you'll suggest just _taking your word for it_?

--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.

(I R A Darth Aggie) writes:

On Tue, 02 May 2006 19:21:09 GMT,
Claudius Denk , in
wrote:
+
+ "I R A Darth Aggie" wrote
+
+ Not any that I have. Are you talking about Brownian motion?
+
+ Follow the thread of the same name on sci.environment

Ummm...no. I'm not subscribed to that newsgroup, nor will I subscribe
to that newsgroup. In fact, I kill file postings that are crossposted
into that newsgroup.

I can understand that decision. That would preclude you from having
seen my earlier post where I pointed out that Denk (who until recently was
posting as Jim McGinn) has been confusing terms there, too. I cross-posted
that to sci.environment.


So, I guess we're stuck. You won't provide a definition, my
dictionaries won't provide a definition, and I refuse to go to one
newsgroup that you suggest will make all clear.

It won't help. He refuses to provide definitions there, too.


I don't suppose you'll suggest just _taking your word for it_?

Probably not. He'll just tell you he won't educate you, you're a
whacko, etc. The typical Usenet troll/paid shill crap that you've probably
already decided isn't worth reading in sci.environment.

Back to your regularly-scheduled newsgroup....

"I R A Darth Aggie" wrote

+ Not any that I have. Are you talking about Brownian motion?
+
+ Follow the thread of the same name on sci.environment

Ummm...no. I'm not subscribed to that newsgroup,

That's unfortunate.

nor will I subscribe
to that newsgroup. In fact, I kill file postings that are crossposted
into that newsgroup.

Yikes! Run postings, run.

So, I guess we're stuck.

That's downright regrettable.

You won't provide a definition, my
dictionaries won't provide a definition, and I refuse to go to one
newsgroup that you suggest will make all clear.

I don't suppose you'll suggest just _taking your word for it_?

I wouldn't pretend to advise you on the mechanics of your decision making
process.

"D Smith" wrote

+ Follow the thread of the same name on sci.environment

Ummm...no. I'm not subscribed to that newsgroup, nor will I subscribe
to that newsgroup. In fact, I kill file postings that are crossposted
into that newsgroup.

I can understand that decision. That would preclude you from having
seen my earlier post where I pointed out that Denk (who until recently was
posting as Jim McGinn) has been confusing terms there, too. I cross-posted
that to sci.environment.

It's regrettable that you are so stubbornly resistant to pointing out the
details of my confusion. I'm hopeful that maybe I might learn something.

So, I guess we're stuck. You won't provide a definition, my
dictionaries won't provide a definition, and I refuse to go to one
newsgroup that you suggest will make all clear.

It won't help. He refuses to provide definitions there, too.


I don't suppose you'll suggest just _taking your word for it_?

Probably not. He'll just tell you he won't educate you,

True. But I am willing to address specific points.

you're a whacko, etc.

He hasn't met the requirements of whackoism . . . yet.

The typical Usenet troll/paid shill crap
that you've probably already decided isn't worth reading in
sci.environment.

Back to your regularly-scheduled newsgroup....