Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) (sci.geo.meteorology) For the discussion of meteorology and related topics. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Graham P Davis" wrote in message ... wrote: snip Given that we're not made of money, that wealthy industrial nations are better able to cope with change than poor undeveloped countries, that 2/3 of the warming is in the winter and at night, and that the expected change is about 1.2 Degrees C per century, it's small wonder that even most Democrats believe money is better spent elsewhere than in cutting back energy production. 1.2 DegC per century? Why pick a figure below the IPCC predicted range? Or is that a daft question? Try 1.4-5.8 DegC. I don't know about the Democrats policy but here in the UK, the Conservative Party criticise the current government for not doing enough to cut carbon emissions. It's only been about 50 years since several hundred Londoners died coughing up black flem from a killer black fog. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WARMEST JUNE IN 127 NORTHERN HEMISPHERE YEARS!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
WARMEST JUNE IN 127 NORTHERN HEMISPHERE YEARS!! | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
April was the 9th warmest in 127 Northern Hemisphere years | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
March was the 11th warmest in 127 Northern Hemisphere years | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) | |||
January was the 6th warmest in 127 Northern Hemisphere years | sci.geo.meteorology (Meteorology) |